Integration and Innovation of Higher Education Management and Student Training Mechanisms Based on Big Data

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

The evaluation index of the fusion innovation model

Primary indicator	Secondary indicator	Tertiary index	Index number
Thought education (A)	Ideological and political performance (A1)	Three-view performance	A11
		Social responsibility	A12
		Political loyalty	A13
		Communism ideal	A14
	Moral quality (A2)	Good judgment	A21
		Behavior performance	A22
		Honesty	A23
		Dedication	A24
Ability culture (B)	Comprehensive ability (B1)	Interpersonal communication and coordination	B11
		Planning organization capability	B12
		Verbal and verbal ability	B13
		Team ability	B14
	Comprehensive quality (B2)	Physical quality	B21
		Mental quality	B22
		professionalism	B23
		Humanistic and artistic cultivation	B24

Y1 college innovation model implementation effectiveness evaluation

Secondary indicator	Assessment score	Tertiary index	Index number	Assessment score
Ideological and political performance (A1)	15.16	Three-view performance	A11	4.2
		Social responsibility	A12	3.8
		Political loyalty	A13	3
		Communism ideal	A14	4.16
Moral quality (A2)	13.27	Good judgment	A21	3.28
		Behavior performance	A22	3.41
		Honesty	A23	3.56
		Dedication	A24	3.02
Comprehensive ability (B1)	15.35	Interpersonal communication and coordination	B11	4.93
		Planning organization capability	B12	3.21
		Verbal and verbal ability	B13	3
		Team ability	B14	4.21
Comprehensive quality (B2)	15.94	Physical quality	B21	3.89
		Mental quality	B22	4.27
		professionalism	B23	3.65
		Humanistic and artistic cultivation	B24	4.13

Y2 college innovation model implementation effectiveness evaluation

Secondary indicator	Assessment score	Tertiary index	Index number	Assessment score
Ideological and political performance (A1)	13.05	Three-view performance	A11	2.7
		Social responsibility	A12	3.27
		Political loyalty	A13	3.21
		Communism ideal	A14	3.87
Moral quality (A2)	14.04	Good judgment	A21	3.03
		Behavior performance	A22	3.95
		Honesty	A23	2.73
		Dedication	A24	4.33
Comprehensive ability (B1)	14.31	Interpersonal communication and coordination	B11	3.21
		Planning organization capability	B12	3.5
		Verbal and verbal ability	B13	4.12
		Team ability	B14	3.48
Comprehensive quality (B2)	14.78	Physical quality	B21	2.99
		Mental quality	B22	4.15
		professionalism	B23	4.36
		Humanistic and artistic cultivation	B24	3.28

Analysis of differences in student satisfaction at different points of performance

Dimension		Education management	Course setting	Culture system	Culture target	Average
<2.0	Mean	3.96	3.96	4.72	3.85	4.12
	SD	0.32	0.61	0.71	0.45	0.36
2.0-2.5	Mean	4.21	4.12	4.51	3.92	4.19
	SD	0.67	0.36	0.56	0.79	0.42
2.5-3.0	Mean	4.17	4.03	4.69	3.87	4.19
	SD	0.88	0.38	0.52	0.31	0.46
3.0-3.5	Mean	3.91	4.11	4.59	3.92	4.13
	SD	0.41	0.44	0.92	0.86	0.86
>3.5	Mean	4.4	4.18	4.74	4.19	4.38
	SD	0.9	0.85	0.79	0.69	0.69
P		1.196	1.247	1.158	1.038	1.157

Analysis of differences in students’ satisfaction in different grades

Dimension		Education management	Course setting	Culture system	Culture target	Average
Freshman year	Mean	4.11	3.98	4.78	3.87	4.185
	SD	0.85	0.52	0.49	0.36	0.44
Sophomore	Mean	4.16	4.06	4.62	3.96	4.2
	SD	0.44	0.38	0.76	0.3	0.65
Junior	Mean	4.08	4.15	4.51	4.23	4.2425
	SD	0.42	0.95	0.47	0.99	0.66
Senior year	Mean	4.17	4.13	4.69	3.74	4.1825
	SD	0.92	0.33	0.95	0.73	0.5
P		0.503	0.849	0.337	0.824	0.584