Research on a method of completeness index based on complex model

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Model P1 and model P2 completeness distance index EX experimental information table

Experimental parameters	Condition example
Testing purposes	The performance of the blue square model P1 and the blue square model P2 in different mid-markets, and its completeness distance index EX
Test function	XE¯=1tm−t1∑i=t1tmREAtiSEAti \overline {{X_E}} = {1 \over {{t_m} - {t_1}}}\sum\limits_{i = {t_1}}^{{t_m}} {{{REA_{{t_i}}} \over {SEA_{{t_i}}}}}
Test environment	Random Go, Windows7, VS2010
Contrast variable	F0–4 (200), F5–9 (200), F10–14 (200), F15–19 (200) and F20–24(200)
Data set	A complete game record of 2500 nine-way Go in the StoneBase game record
Data instance

Experimental information table of the relationship between generated knowledge and generated video

Experimental parameters	Condition example
Testing purposes	Use the complex model cognitive network to generate video and real video for observation distance EX
Test function	XE¯=1tm−t1∑i=t1tmREAtiSEAti \overline {{X_E}} = {1 \over {{t_m} - {t_1}}}\sum\limits_{i = {t_1}}^{{t_m}} {{{REA_{{t_i}}} \over {SEA_{{t_i}}}}}
Test environment	TensorFlow, Cuda, Windows7, VS2010
Contrast variable	Frame 100, 200, 250, 275
Data set	600 video framed images of the Cityscape dataset
Data instance

Orbit simulation and observation system observation distance EX experimental information table

Experimental parameters	Condition example
Testing purposes	Orbit simulation and observation system observation distance EX, in the state of continuous 300 frames, the consistency of the motion of each entity
Test function	XE¯=1tm−t1∑i=t1tmREAtiSEAti \overline {{X_E}} = {1 \over {{t_m} - {t_1}}}\sum\limits_{i = {t_1}}^{{t_m}} {{{REA_{{t_i}}} \over {SEA_{{t_i}}}}}
Test environment	Random Go, Windows7, VS2010
Contrast variable	Frame 100, 200, 250, 275
Data set	A track simulation system
Data instance

Experimental result table of physical pixel distance of track system

Entity	Frame 100	Frame 200	Frame 250	Frame 275
1	400, 696	505, 801	510, 795	490, 768
2	392, 688	498, 793	496, 779	473, 750
3	379, 673	492, 785	491, 772	457, 729

The completeness distance index EX experiment result table of track system simulation and acquisition source

Entity	Frame 100	Frame 200	Frame 250	Frame 275
1	0.1562	0.1587	0.1546	0.1565
2	0.1495	0.1492	0.1457	0.1684
3	0.1874	0.1854	0.1871	0.1824

Table of experimental results of completeness distance index for EX model and P1 model

EX	F0–4 (200)	F5–9 (200)	F10–14 (200)	F15–19 (200)	F20–24 (200)
P1	0.72	0.28	0.23	0.18	0.13
P2	0.83	0.18	0.14	0.12	0.06

Track system entity simulation two-dimensional position coordinate experiment result table

Entity	Frame 100	Frame 200	Frame 250	Frame 275
1	(377, 241)	(280, 283)	(296, 317)	(329, 329)
2	(386, 241)	(288, 284)	(313, 317)	(346, 323)
3	(401, 239)	(297, 286)	(322, 322)	(369, 326)