Accès libre

Research on Innovative Strategies of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Smart City Management and Its Practical Effects

Zhisong Wu

Zhisong Wu

School of Public Administration, Guangxi Police CollegeNanning, China
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Wu, Zhisong
  
19 mars 2025
Research on Innovative Strategies of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Smart City Management and Its Practical Effects's Cover Image
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Citez
Télécharger la couverture
Publié en ligne: 19 mars 2025
Reçu: 26 oct. 2024
Accepté: 12 févr. 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0546
Mots clés
© 2025 Zhisong Wu, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Q rating table

Grade Q value Importance
First class >0.504 Dominant factor
Second class 0.341-0.504 Secondary dominance
Tertiary 0.224-0.340 Important factor
Four level <0.224 General factor

Intelligence policy results

City Rational distance D+ Negative ideal distance D- After normalization Ranking
A 0.7823 0.1885 0.0806 5
B 0.039 0.8776 0.3986 1
C 0.5789 0.3284 0.1503 3
D 0.7174 0.3169 0.1271 4
E 0.4687 0.6634 0.2439 2

Industrial land shadow factor interaction detection results

X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12 X13 X14 X15
X1 0.341
X2 0.9 0.221
X3 0.873 0.445 0.266
X4 0.888 0.553 0.558 0.466
X5 0.701 0.891 0.927 0.851 0.503
X6 0.822 0.417 0.386 0.584 0.892 0.331
X7 0.871 0.83 0.796 0.942 0.899 0.811 0.664
X8 0.582 0.795 0.783 0.942 0.597 0.802 0.788 0.319
X9 0.722 0.98 0.897 0.955 0.881 0.519 0.868 0.878 0.203
X10 0.751 0.825 0.776 0.83 0.784 0.835 0.786 0.719 0.892 0.575
X11 0.792 0.902 0.846 0.831 0.86 0.592 0.836 0.919 0.524 0.858 0.263
X12 0.789 0.834 0.847 0.805 0.715 0.799 0.714 0.75 0.849 0.789 0.84 0.561
X13 0.818 0.752 0.677 0.899 0.987 0.683 0.854 0.665 0.557 0.893 0.452 0.839 0.112
X14 0.903 0.733 0.866 0.84 0.89 0.702 0.767 0.818 0.705 0.793 0.617 0.828 0.787 0.172
X15 0.748 0.809 0.715 0.838 0.713 0.598 0.804 0.645 0.711 0.78 0.666 0.651 0.618 0.789 0.462

Level analysis index weight summary table

Target layer Criterion layer Index layer Hierarchical weight Weight
A city management performance evaluation of smart city (1.0000) Infrastructure indicators (0.1354) Fiber optic broadband access rate 0.2589 0.0525
Wireless network coverage 0.2512 0.0524
Urban tube intelligent terminal coverage 0.1958 0.0343
Urban management public platform and basic database coverage 0.2941 0.0566
Intelligent government index (0.2356) Information disclosure timely rate 0.2458 0.0505
Information security level 0.3957 0.0804
Intelligent decision penetration rate 0.3585 0.0753
Huimin service index (0.0879) Urban management case rate 0.2854 0.0527
Life domain service application 0.2105 0.0404
Urban management service satisfaction 0.2465 0.0509
Supervision and complaint rate 0.2576 0.0515
Guarantee index (0.3584) Policies and regulations 0.3156 0.0712
Organization system improvement 0.4178 0.0801
Capital input level 0.2666 0.0513
Developmental index (0.1827) Project overall development sustainable performance 0.3468 0.0756
Environment and resources sustainable 0.2987 0.0501
Service rate growth rate 0.3545 0.0715

Infrastructure indicators results

City Rational distance D+ Negative ideal distance D- After normalization Ranking
A 0.1489 0.166 0.2223 2
B 0.1426 0.2669 0.2742 1
C 0.1914 0.1376 0.1758 4
D 0.2756 0.1416 0.1421 5
E 0.2291 0.1792 0.1851 3

Guarantee index results

City Rational distance D+ Negative ideal distance D- After normalization Ranking
A 0.6337 0.4579 0.1479 4
B 0.6363 0.4326 0.1431 5
C 0.1044 0.9353 0.3534 1
D 0.5841 0.6111 0.1802 2
E 0.5717 0.5621 0.1753 3

Comprehensive evaluation results

City Rational distance D+ Negative ideal distance D- After normalization Ranking
A 0.3829 0.4678 0.1948 4
B 0.3435 0.4578 0.2024 3
C 0.3165 0.5024 0.2177 2
D 0.2028 0.5398 0.2585 1
E 0.5245 0.2914 0.1269 5

Developmental indicator results

City Rational distance D+ Negative ideal distance D- After normalization Ranking
A 0.2238 0.7368 0.273 2
B 0.5967 0.4853 0.1593 4
C 0.1058 0.9239 0.3554 1
D 0.4486 0.5858 0.2012 3
E 0.9097 0.029 0.0106 5

Factor interaction nonlinear enhancement detection results

Factor interaction q comparison Factor interaction q comparison Factor interaction q comparison
q(X1 ∩ X2)>q(X1+X2) q(X3 ∩ X7)>q(X3+X7) q(X6 ∩ X14)>q(X6+14)
q(X1 ∩ X3)>q(X1+X3) q(X3 ∩ X8)>q(X3+X8) q(X7 ∩ X13)>q(X7+13)
q(X1 ∩ X4)>q(X1+X4) q(X3 ∩ X9)>q(X3+X9) q(X8 ∩ X9)>q(X8+X9)
q(X1 ∩ X6)>q(X1+X6) q(X3 ∩ X11)>q(X3+11) q(X8 ∩ X11)>q(X8+11)
q(X1 ∩ X9)>q(X1+X9) q(X3 ∩ X13)>q(X3+13) q(X8 ∩ X13)>q(X8+13)
q(X1 ∩ X11)>q(X1+11) q(X3 ∩ X14)>q(X3+14) q(X8 ∩ X14)>q(X8+14)
q(X1 ∩ X13)>q(X1+13) q(X4 ∩ X8)>q(X4+X8) q(X9 ∩ X10)>q(X9+10)
q(X1 ∩ X14)>q(X1+14) q(X4 ∩ X9)>q(X4+X9) q(X9 ∩ X12)>q(X9+12)
q(X2 ∩ X5)>q(X2+X5) q(X4 ∩ X11)>q(X4+11) q(X9 ∩ X13)>q(X9+13)
q(X2 ∩ X8)>q(X2+X8) q(X4 ∩ X13)>q(X4+13) q(X9 ∩ X14)>q(X9+14)
q(X2 ∩ X9)>q(X2+X9) q(X4 ∩ X14)>q(X4+14) q(X10 ∩ X13)>q(X10+13)
q(X2 ∩ X11)>q(X2+11) q(X5 ∩ X9)>q(X5+X9) q(X11 ∩ X14)>q(X11+14)
q(X2 ∩ X13)>q(X2+13) q(X5 ∩ X11)>q(X5+11) q(X12 ∩ X13)>q(X12+13)
q(X2 ∩ X14)>q(X2+14) q(X5 ∩ X13)>q(X5+13) q(X12 ∩ X14)>q(X12+14)
q(X2 ∩ X15)>q(X2+15) q(X5 ∩ X14)>q(X5+14) q(X13 ∩ X14)>q(X13+14)
q(X3 ∩ X5)>q(X3+X5) q(X6 ∩ X8)>q(X6+X8) q(X14 ∩ X15)>q(X14+15)
q(X3 ∩ X6)>q(X3+X6) q(X6 ∩ X13)>q(X6+13)

Factor interaction type

Graphic representation Criterion Interaction
--†--*----*----*----q q(Xi ∩ Xj) < min[q(Xi),q(Xj)] Nonlinear attenuation
----*--†--*----*----q min[q(Xi),q(Xj)] < q(Xi ∩ Xj) < max[q(Xi),q(Xj)] Single factor nonlinear attenuation
----*----*--†--*----q max[q(Xi),q(Xj)] < q(Xi ∩ Xj) Double factor enhancement
----*----*----†*----q q(Xi ∩ Xj) = q(Xi) + q(Xj) Independence
----*----*----*--†--q q(Xi ∩ Xj) > q(Xi) + q(Xj) Nonlinear enhancement
* min[q(Xi),q(Xj)]
* max[q(Xi),q(Xj)]
* q(Xi) + q(Xj)
† q(Xi ∩ Xj)

Industrial land performance impact factor detection results

Influencing factor Factor symbol Influencing factor Q value
Natural environment X1 Mean elevation 0.339
X2 waters 0.222
X3 Basic farmland 0.265
X4 ploughing 0.462
X5 Forest coverage 0.506
Economic development X6 Gross agricultural output 0.33
X7 Total industrial output 0.657
X8 Commercial income 0.32
Social livelihood X9 Rural income per capita 0.214
X10 population 0.582
X11 education 0.259
Public service X12 Educational facilities 0.563
X13 Public facilities 0.112
X14 Traffic network 0.179
X15 Green and park 0.463

The intelligent city management performance evaluation index

Target layer Criterion layer Index layer
A city management performance evaluation of smart city A Infrastructure indicators B1 Fiber optic broadband access rate C1
Wireless network coverage C2
Urban tube intelligent terminal coverage C3
Urban management public platform and basic database coverage C4
Intelligent government index B2 Information disclosure timely rate C5
Information security level C6
Intelligent decision penetration rate C7
Huimin service index B3 Urban management case rate C8
Life domain service application C9
Urban management service satisfaction C10
Supervision and complaint rate C11
Guarantee index B4 Policies and regulations C12
Organization system improvement C13
Capital input level C14
Developmental index B5 Project overall development sustainable performance C15
Environment and resources sustainable C16
Service rate growth rate C17

Intelligent management of city A performance factor detection results

Economic Q value Social Q value Ecological Q value Ecological Q value
X5 0.713 X7 0.654 X5 0.314 X1 0.613
X1 0.702 X5 0.519 X3 0.302 X10 0.591
X4 0.491 X12 0.449 X1 0.269 X9 0.523
X12 0.455 X10 0.444 X15 0.225 X6 0.519
X11 0.379 X1 0.374 X8 0.198 X2 0.487
X15 0.383 X2 0.334 X7 0.184 X4 0.476
X7 0.373 X15 0.326 X9 0.18 X15 0.464
X8 0.36 X4 0.264 X14 0.143 X5 0.414
X10 0.317 X14 0.265 X2 0.137 X7 0.391
X14 0.176 X9 0.247 X12 0.131 X12 0.382
X13 0.164 X8 0.243 X10 0.12 X3 0.217
X6 0.142 X6 0.188 X6 0.12 X14 0.135
X3 0.123 X11 0.181 X4 0.099 X8 0.127
X2 0.102 X3 0.179 X11 0.075 X11 0.116
X9 0.051 X13 0.091 X13 0.06 X13 0.013

Entropy weights index weight summary table

Target layer Criterion layer Index layer Hierarchical weight Weight Composite weight
A city management performance evaluation of smart city (1.0000) Infrastructure indicators (0.1354) Fiber optic broadband access rate 0.2526 0.0352 0.0445
Wireless network coverage 0.2517 0.0351 0.0509
Urban tube intelligent terminal coverage 0.2515 0.0381 0.0356
Urban management public platform and basic database coverage 0.2442 0.0276 0.0789
Intelligent government index (0.2356) Information disclosure timely rate 0.3486 0.0899 0.0897
Information security level 0.3301 0.0395 0.0789
Intelligent decision penetration rate 0.3213 0.0489 0.0589
Huimin service index (0.0879) Urban management case rate 0.2552 0.0319 0.1075
Life domain service application 0.2398 0.0112 0.0985
Urban management service satisfaction 0.2514 0.0909 0.0179
Supervision and complaint rate 0.2536 0.0815 0.0159
Guarantee index (0.3584) Policies and regulations 0.3108 0.0812 0.0255
Organization system improvement 0.3440 0.0805 0.0698
Capital input level 0.3452 0.0713 0.0442
Developmental index (0.1827) Project overall development sustainable performance 0.2056 0.0856 0.0281
Environment and resources sustainable 0.3010 0.0601 0.0253
Service rate growth rate 0.4934 0.0915 0.1299

Service indicators results

City Rational distance D+ Negative ideal distance D- After normalization Ranking
A 0.4176 0.5902 0.1801 3
B 0.5768 0.5212 0.1457 4
C 0.0635 0.8498 0.2859 2
D 0.041 0.8692 0.2929 1
E 0.746 0.3358 0.0949 5
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
1 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Sciences de la vie, Sciences de la vie, autres, Mathématiques, Mathématiques appliquées, Mathématiques générales, Physique, Physique, autres
RSS Feed de la revue