Accès libre

The Inheritance and Innovation of Folk Culture in Visual Communication Design Education

,  et   
19 mars 2025
À propos de cet article

Citez
Télécharger la couverture

Introduction

Traditional folk culture is a representative of the Chinese art industry, which not only has a profound connotation and a long history and culture, but also contains the most original Chinese emotions and aesthetics, and at the same time, it endows many creators with rich local resources [1-3]. Traditional folk culture has a very important artistic value, and this also provides an important development path for teaching visual traditional design [4-5]. This deep integration of artistic and cultural backgrounds and visual designers has a very important significance for the inheritance of traditional folk culture.

Visual communication design is a new art discipline, which is the transmission and reception of information on perceived things through visual observation [6]. The emergence of this kind of art on the one hand strengthens the convenience of the consumer industry, creates some kind of direct connection between goods, consumers and producers, and makes the objects more infectious on the spiritual level through continuous innovation [7-9]. On the other hand, visual communication design has the role of dissemination and promotion in terms of function, and different design ways will bring people different visual feelings [10-11]. Under the vigorous promotion of the society, visual communication art has gradually come into the classroom and occupies a pivotal position in design. And traditional folk culture, as a representative of national art, is bound to be comprehensively utilized in visual communication, which can not only improve the learning level of students, but also make an important contribution to the teaching of visual communication design [12-15]. By integrating folk culture into visual communication design education, students can deeply understand and feel the value and significance of folk culture, enhance their respect and love for traditional culture, and improve their cultural literacy [16-18]. Through teaching interactions and exchanges, students can deeply understand the cultural connotation and values behind folk culture, and then enhance their cognitive level and aesthetic interest in traditional culture [19-22]. Therefore, the integration of folk culture into visual communication design education helps to enhance students’ cultural literacy, cultivate their cognition and understanding of traditional culture, stimulate their creativity and innovation consciousness, and make positive contributions to their future design practice [23-26].

This paper proposes an innovative application strategy of folk culture in visual communication design education, and studies its teaching effect based on structural equation modeling. The questionnaire survey method is adopted, and the students of visual communication design in three local universities are selected as the respondents to carry out the questionnaire survey. The reliability of the questionnaire scale was tested by SPSS22.0 and validated factor analysis. The teaching effect model was constructed, and the results of the structural equation model were tested by exploratory factor analysis and validation factor analysis.

Innovative Application Strategies of Folk Culture in Visual Communication Design Education
Enhance the diversification of folklore cultural expressions

Applying traditional folk culture expression forms to visual communication design can not only better protect folk intangible culture and provide brand-new ideas for design teaching, but also guide students to create art according to traditional folk culture, which is an important way to deeply excavate traditional folk culture works and give life to design works. In the process of practical application, firstly, students should analyze the characteristics and shapes of the design works according to their own impressions, and then the lecturer will guide and summarize them to effectively and quickly improve the students’ knowledge and understanding of the expression forms of the traditional folk culture, and finally let the students apply these graphics, colors and shapes to the design works to form a diversified expression form, and this kind of transformation from in-depth understanding to application design can subconsciously enhance the students’ understanding of the traditional folk culture. This transformation from in-depth understanding to application design can subconsciously improve students’ visual communication art level.

Improve the integration of folk culture pattern elements

As the most direct way of expression in design, pattern elements are also loved by the general public. This requires design teachers to guide students to understand the principles of pattern symbols, creation techniques and theoretical knowledge as much as possible in the actual visual communication art teaching, and apply these contents to the actual operation, so that students can learn diversified visual communication art skills. For example, in art modeling, the rationality and standardization of the use of pattern colors can show the infectious force of visual communication art to the greatest extent, and also let students understand plants, animals and other contents in depth. In addition, strengthening students’ transformation of folklore patterns can also enable students to acquire more ability to change color and structure, and improve the effect of classroom teaching.

Teaching methods for deepening the living heritage of folk culture

Most of the traditional folk cultures take the inheritance system as the main way of continuation. With the introduction of traditional folk culture inheritors as the premise, through their living teaching, it can make students majoring in visual communication design in colleges and universities better understand the original ecological fine arts. For example, the current decline in the use of Zhuang brocade fabrics has led to the gradual disappearance of this traditional folk material, and in the current situation, people can’t get in touch with this traditional content, which requires colleges and universities to combine the modern culture and traditional national characteristics, and introduce some traditional craftsmen into the college and university design classroom lectures, exchanges, or let them serve as part-time teachers and other ways, so that college and university students in the field of design can understand the more original art content. This will not only help students more directly experience the charm of traditional folk culture, but also deepen their knowledge of national culture and enhance the recognition of China’s traditional culture.

Research model

Compared with traditional statistical methods, structural equation modeling integrates path analysis and factor analysis, which can not only determine the strength of the relationship between factors, but also fit and judge the overall model, explain the complex relationship between variables and the direct, indirect and total effects of independent variables on dependent variables. In structural equation modeling, there are concepts such as: latent variable, exogenous latent variable, endogenous latent variable, observed variable, mediator variable, unstandardized path coefficient, standardized path coefficient, direct effect effect, indirect effect effect, total effect value, measurement model, and structural model.

Basic concepts of structural equation modeling

Latent variables that are not directly observable or theoretical variables are called latent variables.

A latent variable with an exogenous latent variable as the cause is called an exogenous latent variable and is denoted by the symbol ξ .

A latent variable with an endogenous latent variable as its effect is called an endogenous latent variable and is denoted by the symbol η .

Observed variables can be observed by the value of the actual indicator, often used to reflect the latent variable, in which the observed variable of the exogenous latent variable is denoted by the symbol X, and the observed variable of the endogenous latent variable is denoted by the symbol Y.

Mediating variable A potential variable is not only affected by the exogenous potential variable (at this time, the variable attribute is the endogenous potential variable), but also affects other variables (at this time, the variable attribute is the exogenous potential variable), at this time, this variable has the attribute of the exogenous potential variable as well as the attribute of the endogenous potential variable, and such a variable is a mediating variable. An example of a mediating variable is shown in Figure 1, where the endogenous latent variable 1 is the mediating variable, taking the three latent variables as an example.

Figure 1.

Schematic diagram of intermediary variables

Unstandardized path coefficients portray the quantitative relationship between observed and latent variables.

Standardized path coefficients describe the strength of the effect of observed variables on latent variables and exogenous latent variables on endogenous latent variables.

The direct effect effect is the direct effect of an exogenous latent variable on an endogenous latent variable in a one-way arrow, with no mediating variable, and the magnitude of the value is the standardized regression coefficient β value.

Indirect effect effect the effect of an exogenous latent variable on an endogenous latent variable through more than one mediating variable, the magnitude of the value is equal to the product obtained by multiplying the path coefficients of all direct effects.

The total effect value direct effect value plus the indirect effect value.

For example, if X1 is the exogenous latent variable, X2 and X3 are the mediating variables, and X4 is the endogenous latent variable, the effect of each variable is shown in Figure 2, and the value of the effect of each of the effects of X1 on X4 is shown in Table 1:

Figure 2.

Schematic diagram of impact effect

Calculation of effect value

Direct effect value r14
Direct effect value r12×r24× + r13×r34
Total effect value r14 + r12×r24 + r13×r34

Note: Standardized regression coefficients are generally chosen in the calculation of each impact effect value.

Basic models for structural equation modeling

The mathematical expression for the measurement model is: X=Λxξ+δ(Exogenouslatentvariableequations) Y=Λ,η+ε(Endogenouslatentvariableequations) where ξ is a vector of order n×1 consisting of n exogenous latent variables; X is a vector of order q×1 consisting of q observed variables of exogenous latent ξ variables; and Λx denotes the coefficients of the linking X variables on the ξ variables, an q×n th order matrix; δ is a vector of order q×1 consisting of the q measurement errors of X; η is a vector of order m×1 consisting of the m observed variables of the endogenous latent variable, Y is a vector of order p×1 consisting of the p observed variables of the endogenous latent variable η ; Λy represents the coefficients of the linking Y variables on the variables of η the p×m th-order matrix; and ε is a vector of order p×1 consisting of the p measurement errors of Y the endogenous latent variable.

Mathematical expression of the structural model η=Bη+Γξ+ζ Where ξ and η have the same meaning as above, B denotes the directional link coefficients between the η variables, a m×m th order matrix describing the interactions between the endogenous latent variables η ; Γ denotes the regression coefficients for the effect of the ξ variables on the η variables, a m×n th order matrix describing the effect of the exogenous latent variable ξ on the endogenous latent variable η ; and ζ denotes the error on the endogenous latent variable, a m×1th order vector.

The above occurrences of Λx, Λy, Bn and Γ all refer to unstandardized path coefficients.

The effect of the innovative application of folk culture
Influencing factors
Objects of study

In order to investigate the teaching effect of the innovative application strategy of folk culture in visual communication design education, this paper selects visual communication design students as the research object. A questionnaire was randomly distributed to the students of three local universities of different levels in a random sampling method, in order to make the survey more comprehensively respond to the overall situation in the region. The three universities selected are University A, which is relatively poor in terms of student quality and faculty strength in the region, and Universities B and C, which are relatively good in terms of student quality and faculty strength. The questionnaires were distributed in equal proportions at the three universities in order to satisfy the diversity of the research and to reflect the hierarchical nature of the survey.

Variable selection and questionnaire test

Reliability of the questionnaire

The official questionnaire of this study was edited and distributed by the website “Questionnaire Star”, which can show the specific response time of the respondents in the results. Through observation, it was found that most of the questionnaires had a response time of about 150 seconds, while some questionnaires had a response time of less than 80 seconds, which could not guarantee the quality of the questionnaires, so the questionnaires with a response time of less than 80 seconds were regarded as invalid questionnaires and were excluded from the present study in order to ensure the reliability of the study. A total of 339 questionnaires were received. After removing 18 invalid questionnaires, there were 321 valid questionnaires, and the scale part of this paper consisted of 17 questions, the sample size was greater than 10 times of the scale items, and the sample size was moderate.

The research dimensions of this study were categorized into four dimensions: morphological pluralism, elemental integration, living teaching, and teaching effectiveness, and all variables were operationally defined and measurement question items were identified in relation to the research questions of this study.

Morphological plurality

Q1: The expression forms of folk culture show diversity in the curriculum

Q2: The expressive forms of folk culture can cover multiple aspects of graphics, colors, and shapes

Q3: The expression forms of folk culture in visual design can cover the characteristics of different regions or ethnic groups

Q4: Different types of folk culture symbols and elements are often used in the design process.

Integration of elements

Q5: In the course, the integration of folk culture pattern elements with modern design styles is good

Q6: In the course, learned how to combine folk culture pattern elements with modern design methods

Q7: Able to balance folk culture pattern elements and modern design needs well

Q8: The integration of folk culture pattern elements with modern design helps to enhance the cultural depth of visual design

Live teaching

Q9: Schools often invite traditional folk culture experts or inheritors to give design classroom lectures and exchange sessions

Q10:The school often interacts and communicates with traditional folk culture experts or inheritors in the classroom.

Q11: The teaching content combines contemporary interpretation and innovative cases of folk culture, which is more in line with modern design needs.

Q12: Understanding folk culture through hands-on practice (e.g. handcraft, traditional craft experience, etc.) is helpful to the design of works

Teaching Effectiveness

Q13:Able to understand and master how to use folk culture elements in design during the learning process

Q14:After the course, they can use folk culture elements creatively in their own designs.

Q15: The study of folk culture elements has improved my visual communication design ability.

Q16: Be able to effectively combine folk culture and modern design trends in design practice.

Q17: Through the course, my ability to recognize and apply folk culture has been significantly improved.

The Likert scale was used to divide the effect into five levels, namely “fully compliant”, “somewhat compliant”, “average”, “not compliant” and “very disagreeable”, and assigned as “5”, “4”, “3”, “2” and “1”, and the respondents were required to fill in according to their own perception of the classroom. The collected formal questionnaire data were imported into SPSS22.0 software, and the reliability of the scale part of the questionnaire was tested, and the Cronbach’s alpha value obtained is shown in Table 2.

Cronbach’s Alpha values of the questionnaire

Variable Item CITC Item has been deleted Cronbach’s Alpha value Cronbach’s Alpha
Morphological diversity Q1 0.746 0.857 0.872
Q2 0.658 0.835
Q3 0.621 0.811
Q4 0.758 0.883
Element fusion Q5 0.824 0.892 0.901
Q6 0.791 0.840
Q7 0.693 0.852
Q8 0.628 0.869
Active teaching Q9 0.801 0.883 0.885
Q10 0.762 0.860
Q11 0.625 0.891
Q12 0.688 0.852
Teaching effect Q13 0.807 0.895 0.913
Q14 0.748 0.868
Q15 0.733 0.871
Q16 0.864 0.890
Q17 0.791 0.887

As can be seen in Table 2, the Cronbach’s Alpha for Morphological Diversity is 0.872, the Cronbach’s Alpha for Elemental Integration is 0.901, the Cronbach’s Alpha for Live Teaching is 0.885, the Cronbach’s Alpha for Instructional Effectiveness is 0.913, and the Cronbach’s for each latent variable Alpha coefficients for each of the latent variables meet the basic criterion of being greater than 0.7 and all of them are above 0.8. This shows that the questionnaire used in this study has good reliability. In addition, most of the CITC values between the observed variables and their latent variables are between 0.6 and 0.87, which satisfies the requirement of greater than 0.5. This indicates that the correlation coefficients between the observed variables and their latent variables are all above 0.5 and most of them are between 0.6 and 0.87, which indicates that the latent variables are well set for each question. The reliability of the questionnaire was good. At the same time, observations were made by excluding the observed variables by deleting each variable once. If there is no improvement in the reliability indicators after deletion, the variables are considered to have good reliability for the measurement questions.

Validity of the questionnaire

Validated factor analysis was used to study the discriminant validity by comparing the square root value of the AVE of a factor with the absolute value of the correlation coefficient of that factor with the other factors, and if the square root value of the AVE of that factor is greater than the absolute value of the correlation coefficient of that factor with the other factors, then it indicates a good discriminant validity. Otherwise, the discriminant validity is not good and the measurement items with lower values of standardized loading coefficients can be removed and the validated factor analysis can be repeated. The test of discriminant validity is shown in Table 3.

Correlation and AVE square root values

Factor1 Factor2 Factor3 Factor4
Factor1 0.752
Factor2 0.508 0.762
Factor3 0.489 0.561 0.813
Factor4 0.582 0.591 0.635 0.858

As can be seen from Table 3, the AVE square root value of factor 1 is 0.752, which is greater than the maximum value of the absolute value of the correlation coefficient between the factors, 0.582, indicating good discrimination;The AVE square root value of 0.762 for factor 2 is greater than the maximum value of 0.591 for the absolute value of the correlation coefficient between the factors, indicating good discrimination;The AVE square root value of 0.813 for factor 3 is greater than the maximum value of 0.635 for the absolute value of the correlation coefficient between the factors, indicating good discrimination;The AVE square root value of 0.858 for factor 4 is greater than the maximum value of 0.635 for the absolute value of the correlation coefficient between the factors, indicating good discrimination.

Combining the results of the above analyses, the scale portion of the questionnaire of this study has a strong correlation between the factors and the analyzed items, the scale has good convergent validity, and the scale has good differentiation, then it can be assumed that the scale portion of the formal questionnaire of this study has good construct validity, good appropriateness and truthfulness, and it is possible to carry out the follow-up study.

Descriptive statistics

This section focuses on understanding the overall picture of the sample data results, the answer sheet data were analyzed using SPSS software for descriptive statistics to find the mean, standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis of the scale data respectively and the results obtained are shown in Table 4.

Descriptive statistics

Variable Item Minimum Maximum value Mean value Standard deviation Skewness Kurtosis
Morphological diversity Q1 1 5 3.24 1.21 -0.11 -0.97
Q2 1 5 3.18 1.20 -0.15 -0.95
Q3 1 5 3.65 1.19 -0.14 -0.98
Q4 1 5 3.50 1.25 -0.10 -1.01
Element fusion Q5 1 5 3.28 1.18 -0.43 -0.73
Q6 1 5 3.44 1.09 -0.32 -0.62
Q7 1 5 3.19 1.05 -0.28 -0.66
Q8 1 5 3.25 1.02 -0.21 -0.79
Active teaching Q9 1 5 3.38 1.03 -0.55 -0.63
Q10 1 5 3.50 1.08 -0.52 -0.49
Q11 1 5 3.28 1.12 -0.68 -0.51
Q12 1 5 3.41 1.19 -0.33 -0.29
Teaching effect Q13 1 5 3.65 1.03 -0.63 -0.55
Q14 1 5 3.61 0.99 -0.48 -0.60
Q15 1 5 3.59 0.96 -0.32 -0.25
Q16 1 5 3.91 0.98 -0.68 -0.41
Q17 1 5 3.88 0.97 -0.53 -0.39
Validity tests
Exploratory factor analysis

Exploratory factor analysis was preceded by first testing whether the validation metrics of KMO and Bartlett’s test of sphericity were met. If the KMO value is greater than 0.5 and the Bartlett’s spherical test Sig is less than 0.05, the factor analysis is considered suitable.

As shown in Table 5, the KMO value of this scale is .912>0.5 and sig is .000<0.05. This scale is suitable for factor analysis. Therefore, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted on the 17 question items of the practical training classroom environment, and the results are shown in Table 6. A total of 4 metric factors were extracted, and the amount of variance that could be explained was 72.772%, indicating that the 4 metric factors extracted were basically reasonable.

KMO and Bartlett tests

KMO sample appropriateness measure .912
Bartlett’s sphericity test Approximate chi-square 3204.115
df 326
Sig. .000

Variance interpretation scale

Ingredient Initial eigenvalue Extract sum of squares and load Rotate the sum of squares to load
Total % of variance Accumulate to % Total % of variance Accumulate to % Total % of variance Accumulate to %
1 10.685 51.097 51.097 10.685 51.097 51.097 4.025 25.853 25.853
2 1.992 9.526 60.623 1.992 9.526 60.623 3.031 19.468 45.321
3 1.547 7.397 68.020 1.547 7.397 68.020 2.613 16.783 62.104
4 .994 4.752 72.772 .994 4.752 72.772 1.661 10.668 72.772
5 .955 4.564 77.336
6 .860 4.115 81.451
7 .818 3.914 85.365
8 .584 2.791 88.156
9 .538 2.572 90.728
10 .455 2.178 92.906
11 .331 1.583 94.489
12 .215 1.026 95.515
13 .209 1.001 96.516
14 .206 .989 97.505
15 .193 .922 98.427
16 .168 .805 99.232
17 .161 .768 100.00
Validation factor analysis

Validation factor analysis (CFA for short) is a statistical analysis method used to test and validate whether a theoretical factor structure that has been proposed is consistent with the observed data. This type of analysis is commonly used to measure and validate the appropriateness of conceptual factor models. Prior to conducting a CFA, the factor model to be tested in the study needs to be clearly defined. This includes specifying the potential factors and their relationship to the observed variables, usually a path model CFA usually requires large samples of data to ensure the accuracy and stability of the model.

Model fit reflects the model that matches the theoretical and practical data, and in general, when the model’s fit is higher, it means that the model is more practical, and the test of model fit needs to be assessed by a series of indicators. Comparisons need to be made between the assessment criteria for each indicator and the actual fitted values, so as to test how well the model fits. Specific test indicators include chi-square, degrees of freedom, chi-square/degrees of freedom, RMSEA, GFI, AGFI, RFl, NFI, IFI, TLI, and CFI, and when all of these indicators pass the test, the fit is better, which confirms that structural equation modeling is a better fit, chi-square/degrees of freedom: the ratio of chi-square values to degrees of freedom is used to determine how well the model is fitted. A smaller ratio of chi-square/degrees of freedom indicates a better model fit RMSEA is a measure of the fit between the model and the observed data it takes into account the degrees of freedom of the model, a lower value of RMSEA indicates a better fit GFI assesses how well the model explains the observed data. It has a value between 0 and 1, with closer to 1 indicating a better fit, AGFI is a modified version of GFI that takes into account the model’s degrees of freedom. Similar to the GFI, values closer to 1 indicate a better fit. RFI is used to compare the difference between a fitted model and a completely unfitted model. Higher RFI values indicate a better model fit. NFI is a normalized fit metric that ranges from 0 to 1. Higher NFI values indicate a better fitIFI is another normalized fit metric that also ranges from 0 to 1. Higher IFI values indicate a better fit. TLI is a metric for comparing the fit between a set model and an independent model, with higher TLI values indicating a CFI is another metric for comparing the fit between the set model and the independent model Higher CFI values indicate better model fit.

The results of the model fit are shown in Table 7, all the fit indicators are above the critical value, then it means that the indicators have passed the test and the fit is better.

Model fitting results

Fitting index Threshold Current value Result
Chi-square 728.972
Degrees of freedom 298
Chi-square/degrees of freedom <3 2.446 Meet the standard
RMSEA <0.10 0.054 Meet the standard
GFI >0.8 0.914 Meet the standard
AGFI >0.8 0.923 Meet the standard
RFI >0.9 0.925 Meet the standard
NFI >0.9 0.932 Meet the standard
IFI >0.9 0.959 Meet the standard
TLI >0.9 0.952 Meet the standard
CFI >0.9 0.945 Meet the standard

AVE is an indicator used to assess the validity of a measurement model, which measures the average proportion of variance between measurement items (indicators) under the construct, as a percentage of the variance associated with the observation error. AVE values typically range from 0 to 1, with higher AVE values indicating that the measurement items explain more of the variance of the construct, i.e., that they better reflect the construct. Typically, an AVE value greater than 0.5 is considered good, indicating that the measurement item has high validity. CR is a metric used to assess the reliability of a measurement model. It measures the total proportion of variance in the measurement items under the construct, with the proportion of variance associated with observation error. CR values typically range from 0 to 1, with higher CR values indicating higher internal consistency between measurement items. Typically, a CR value greater than 0.7 is considered acceptable, indicating good agreement between measurement terms. The results of the measurement model path coefficient estimation are shown in Table 8. As can be seen from Table 8, the AVEs are all greater than 0.5, and the values of the CRs are all above 0.7, so the convergent validity of the scale is also good.

Estimated result of path coefficient of measurement model

Item Path Variable Estimate S.E. C.R. P Estimate AVE CR
Q1 <--- Morphological diversity 1 0.846 0.59 0.9
Q2 <--- 0.924 0.048 20.981 * 0.782
Q3 <--- 0.918 0.042 20.472 * 0.753
Q4 <--- 0.942 0.047 21.543 * 0.835
Q5 <--- Element fusion 1 0.792 0.71 0.8
Q6 <--- 1.092 0.039 26.257 * 0.832
Q7 <--- 1.024 0.037 25.368 * 0.810
Q8 <--- 0.973 0.032 26.915 * 0.789
Q9 <--- Active teaching 1 0.698 0.56 0.8
Q10 <--- 0.978 0.068 16.326 * 0.775
Q11 <--- 1.021 0.066 17.828 * 0.893
Q12 <--- 0.969 0.062 17.362 * 0.824
Q13 <--- Teaching effect 1 0.698 0.61 0.9
Q14 <--- 0.924 0.045 20.353 * 0.846
Q15 <--- 0.824 0.044 21.753 * 0.725
Q16 <--- 0.715 0.045 25.367 * 0.832
Q17 <--- 0.682 0.046 18.953 * 0.794
Correlation analysis and convergent validity

The correlation analysis is mainly carried out to analyze whether the two two variables are correlated or not. Considering the characteristics of the variables in this analysis, Pearson’s correlation was mainly used to analyze, mainly considering the following points, firstly, whether it is correlated or not, mainly through the P-value, when the P-value is less than 0.05, it can be regarded as correlation between two and two variables, when the value is greater than 0.5, it can be regarded as irrelevant, and then it’s the question of whether the correlation is positive or negative, when the value of the coefficient is greater than 0, it is positive or negative, when the value is less than 0, it is negative. When the value of the coefficient is greater than 0, it means positive correlation, and less than 0, it means negative correlation, the strength of the degree of correlation is mainly based on the size of the absolute value of the coefficient, when the absolute value of the coefficient is closer to 1, it means that the stronger the correlation, and the closer the coefficient is to 0, it means that the weaker the correlation. The results of the correlation analysis of Pearson are shown in Table 9. Through the correlation analysis, it can be seen that morphological plurality, elemental integration, living teaching and teaching effectiveness are correlated, and all of them are positively correlated. Specifically, the correlation coefficients of morphological pluralism, elemental integration, living teaching and teaching effectiveness are 0.263, 0.361, 0.495, respectively, with P<0.05, so that morphological pluralism, elemental integration, living teaching and teaching effectiveness are related and all are positively correlated. As can be seen through the discriminant validity values, the values in the top row are all higher than the absolute value of the values below, indicating that the discriminant validity is better.

Pearson correlation and AVE square root values

Morphological diversity Element fusion Active teaching Teaching effect
Morphological diversity 0.752
Element fusion 0.251 0.762
Active teaching 0.192 0.207 0.813
Teaching effect 0.263 0.361 0.495 0.858
Conclusion

In this paper, for the innovative application strategy of folk culture in visual communication design education, the influence of the three initiatives of morphological plurality, elemental integration, and living teaching on the teaching effect is explored through structural equation modeling.

Using SPSS 22.0 for the reliability test, the Cronbach’s Alpha of morphological plurality, elemental fusion, living teaching, and teaching effect were obtained to be 0.872, 0.901, 0.885, and 0.913, respectively, which met the basic standard of being greater than 0.7, and all of them were above 0.8. In addition, the CITC values between the observed variables and their latent variables satisfy the requirement of being greater than 0.5.

The KMO value for the scale was .912>0.5 with a sig of .000<0.05, and an exploratory factor analysis yielded 72.772% of the variance that could be explained. The fit of the model was tested through a validation factor analysis, which yielded that all the fit indicators were above the critical values. The AVEs were all greater than 0.5 and the CRs all had values above 0.7.

Using Pearson correlation for correlation analysis, the correlation coefficients of morphological plurality, elemental integration, living teaching and teaching effect were obtained to be 0.263, 0.361, 0.495, respectively, with P<0.05.

The results show that the relationship between the innovative application strategy of folk culture in visual communication design education and the teaching effect is positively correlated, which verifies the effectiveness of the innovative application strategy.

Acknowledgements

The Research and Practice Projects on the Reform of Vocational Education Teaching in Henan Province: Research on the Innovative Development of Art Vocational Education in the Perspective of Rural Revitalization (Yujiao (2021) 57972).