Research on the two-way integration path of artificial intelligence-enabled physical education and civic education

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Two-way fusion path evaluation index system

Primary indicator	Secondary indicator	Tertiary index
The attitude of sports and thinking (A)	Cognitive level of ideological and political teaching (A1)	The importance of thinking of political teaching (A11)
		Thinking on the design of political teaching (A12)
		The concept of the design of the political teaching (A13)
	Thinking of political teaching independent learning consciousness (A2)	Focus on the development of physical education (A21)
		Actively improve the design level of ideological and political teaching (A22)
		Actively explore the physical education background (A23)
Sports and thinking about political teaching (B)	Knowledge of sports subject content (B1)	Theoretical general content knowledge (B11)
		Display general content knowledge (B12)
		Special content knowledge (B13)
	Knowledge of physical education (B2)	Pedagogy (B21)
		Intellectual knowledge (B22)
		Teaching evaluation knowledge (B23)
		Teaching reflection knowledge (B24)
		Knowledge of teaching design principle (B25)
	Curriculum thinking (B3)	Theory of thinking on political teaching (B31)
		Experience in thinking of political teaching (B32)
Sports and thinking skills (C)	Intellectual background analysis skills (C1)	Learn to analyze your skills (C11)
		Teaching content analysis skills (C12)
		Teaching age background analysis skills (C13)
		Thinking on the concept of political teaching (C14)
		Thinking on the goal analysis skills (C15)
	The design skills of the process of thinking about the process (C2)	Sports thinking politics elements and teaching design fusion skills (C21)
		Thinking of political teaching and teaching skills (C22)
		Design skills in political situations (C23)
		Design skills of political material (C24)
		Creative skills in thinking of political teaching (C25)
		Thinking of political teaching methods (C26)
	Environmental and media application skills (C3)	Teaching tool application skills (C31)
		Information technology application skills (C32)
	Thinking of political and teaching skills (C4)	The process of thinking about the process (C41)
		Thinking of political teaching (C42)
		Thinking of political and teaching activities (C43)
		Thinking of political teaching and control skills (C44)
	Thinking policy teaching design evaluation skills (C5)	Evaluate student learning skills (C51)
		Reflective thinking Design skill (C52)
		Reflect on the design skills of thinking policy (C53)

The difference between the cognitive situation (M±SD)

Test dimension	Control group (M±SD)	Experimental group (M±SD)	Growth value (M±SD)	t	p
Autonomous learning consciousness	16.25±5.36	18.81±3	2.81±1.75	-3.489	0.003
Sports interest	19.79±2.28	22.13±2.79	0.89±0.11	-4.45	0.000
patriotism	16.65±2.6	20.91±1.5	3.34±0.58	-10.441	0.000
collectivism	18.85±1.98	22.41±2.04	2.48±0.05	-4.054	0.000
Competitive consciousness	19.1±3.8	21.41±1.88	1.76±1.22	-3.516	0.001
Rule consciousness	18.66±2.78	21.47±3.14	3.69±0.29	-5.475	0.000
Ideal belief	18.17±2.77	21.09±1.92	2.95±0.3	-4.405	0.000

Sports thinking policy education effect test dimension

Erial number	Sports thinking policy education effect test dimension	Erial number	Sports thinking policy education effect test dimension
1	Autonomous learning consciousness	5	collectivism
2	Sports interest	6	Rule consciousness
3	Competitive consciousness	7	Ideal belief
4	patriotism

Health test project

Erial number	Health test project	Erial number	Health test project
1	Height (cm)	5	One minute sit-ups
2	Weight (kg)	6	Jumping rope in a minute
3	Lung activity (ml)	7	Preflexion (cm)
4	50 meters (s)	8	And the trip to the bank (s)

The overall weight of the evaluation index system

Primary indicator	Weighting (Weighted weight)	Secondary indicator	Weighting (Weighted weight)	Tertiary index	Weighting (Weighted weight)
(A)	30.855%	(A1)	55.85% (17.23%)	(A11)	37.25% (6.4%)
				(A12)	36.82% (6.3%)
				(A13)	25.93% (4.5%)
		(A2)	44.15% (13.62%)	(A21)	34.88% (4.8%)
				(A22)	35.41% (4.8%)
				(A23)	29.71% (4%)
(B)	32.153%	(B1)	33.25% (10.69%)	(B11)	36.58% (3.9%)
				(B12)	35.37% (3.8%)
				(B13)	28.05% (3%)
		(B2)	34.05% (10.95%)	(B21)	21.38% (2.3%)
				(B22)	21.25% (2.3%)
				(B23)	18.05% (2%)
				(B24)	18.63% (2%)
				(B25)	20.69% (2.1%)
		(B3)	32.7% (10.51%)	(B31)	53.69% (5.6%)
				(B32)	46.31% (4.9%)
(C)	36.992%	(C1)	21.52% (7.96%)	(C11)	17.25% (1.4%)
				(C12)	20.65% (1.6%)
				(C13)	19.63% (1.6%)
				(C14)	20.86% (1.7%)
				(C15)	21.61% (1.7%)
		(C2)	22.65% (8.38%)	(C21)	16.88% (1.4%)
				(C22)	16.75% (1.4%)
				(C23)	16.75% (1.4%)
				(C24)	15.88% (1.3%)
				(C25)	16.79% (1.4%)
				(C26)	16.95% (1.4%)
		(C3)	16.94% (6.27%)	(C31)	49.85% (3.1%)
				(C32)	50.15% (3.1%)
		(C4)	18.95% (7.01%)	(C41)	26.81% (1.9%)
				(C42)	23.66% (1.6%)
				(C43)	22.25% (1.6%)
				(C44)	27.28% (1.9%)
		(C5)	19.94% (7.38%)	(C51)	38.05% (2.8%)
				(C52)	30.52% (2.3%)
				(C53)	31.43% (2.3%)

The comparison between the control group and the physical health was compared

Test dimension	Control group (M±SD)	Experimental group (M±SD)	t	p
Height (cm)	145.17±7.2	146.14±8.41	-1.033	-0.277
Weight (kg)	41.47±11.14	40.99±10.7	1.084	0.577
Lung activity (ml)	2491.03±399.14	2763.05±558.13	-1.801	0.044
50 meters (s)	9.43±1.19	8.32±1.35	-1.518	0.267
One minute sit-ups	13.67±5.37	14.43±4.86	-1.085	1.095
Jumping rope in a minute	130.05±17.08	142.34±26.85	-2.063	0.549
preflexion(cm)	47.08±10.64	49.19±5.26	-0.414	0.278
And the trip to the bank (s)	112.44±15.04	101.94±5.86	3.576	-0.23