Research on the Methods of Enhancing Phonetic Fluency in Oral English Teaching Based on Information Technology

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

A questionnaire was prepared and distributed

Item	Specific content
Q1	Do you like learning in the new English teaching mode? e
Q2	Can you adapt to this teaching mode?
Q3	Do you like the current pronunciation quality evaluation model for spoken English?
Q4	Do you think the current English teaching model improves English learning?
Q5	Can the new teaching mode improve the initiative of English preview?
Q6	Can the new teaching model improve the effect of English preview?
Q7	Do you like to actively present yourself in the new model of presentation class? the
Q8	Do you like the model of the presentation class?
Q9	Do you like the new English learning mode of group cooperative learning? e
Q10	Is the new mode of group cooperative learning fruitful?
Q11	Do you like the feedback class in the new model?
Q12	Did you learn much from the feedback class in the new model?

Manual scoring results

Relevancy		Sentence level	Reader level
English expert	A	0.67	0.83
	B	0.78	0.86
	C	0.71	0.79
Mean value		0.72	0.83

Comparison of oral English post-test results

Group		N	Mean	SD	Standard error mean	P
Total score	1	51	22.59	4.258	0.64722	0.0081**
	2	51	18.48	4.405	0.61375
Standard degree	1	51	5.15	2.204	0.31706	0.0422**
	2	51	4.21	2.119	0.30624
Fluency degree	1	51	10.82	2.045	0.25882	0.0099**
	2	51	8.72	1.971	0.20724
Rhythmic degree	1	51	6.62	2.442	0.32338	0.0415**
	2	51	5.55	2.627	0.37262

Comparison of oral English pre-test results

Group		N	Mean	SD	Standard error mean	P
Total score	1	51	17.61	2.612	0.36727	0.1806
	2	51	17.47	2.464	0.36001
Standard degree	1	51	3.61	1.017	0.14104	0.5549
	2	51	3.48	1.142	0.15133
Fluency degree	1	51	8.77	2.022	0.24224	0.0982
	2	51	8.85	2.111	0.18667
Rhythmic degree	1	51	5.23	1.721	0.27448	0.6217
	2	51	5.14	1.335	0.27231

Oral performance before and after the experiment

Group 2		N	Mean	SD	Standard error mean
Total score	Pre-test	51	17.47	2.464	0.36001
	Post-test	51	18.48	4.405	0.61375
Standard degree	Pre-test	51	3.48	1.142	0.15133
	Post-test	51	4.21	2.119	0.30624
Fluency degree	Pre-test	51	8.85	2.111	0.18667
	Post-test	51	8.72	1.971	0.20724
Rhythmic degree	Pre-test	51	5.14	1.335	0.27231
	Post-test	51	5.55	2.627	0.37262

Experimental class oral performance paired sample T test

Group 1		Pairing difference				t	DF	P
		Mean	SD	Lower limit	Upper limit
Total score	Pre-test	4.98	0.635	1.324	4.052	4.038	50	0.007**
	Post-test
Standard degree	Pre-test	1.54	0.385	0.771	2.304	3.565	50	0.002**
	Post-test
Fluency degree	Pre-test	2.05	0.391	0.602	2.118	3.671	50	0.001**
	Post-test
Rhythmic degree	Pre-test	1.39	0.266	0.417	1.451	4.338	50	0.000**
	Post-test

Oral English scores of experimental classes before and after the experiment

Group 1		N	Mean	SD	Standard error mean
Total score	Pre-test	51	17.61	2.612	0.36727
	Post-test	51	22.59	4.258	0.64722
Standard degree	Pre-test	51	3.61	1.017	0.14104
	Post-test	51	5.15	2.204	0.31706
Fluency degree	Pre-test	51	8.77	2.022	0.24224
	Post-test	51	10.82	2.045	0.25882
Rhythmic degree	Pre-test	51	5.23	1.721	0.27448
	Post-test	51	6.62	2.442	0.32338

Paired sample T test of oral performance before and after the experiment

Group 2		Pairing difference				t	DF	P
		Mean	SD	Lower limit	Upper limit
Total score	Pre-test	1.01	5.334	-2.562	0.525	-1.415	50	0.0672
	Post-test
Standard degree	Pre-test	0.73	3.134	-1.621	0.119	-1.931	50	0.0808
	Post-test
Fluency degree	Pre-test	-0.13	2.56	-0.728	0.447	-1.742	50	0.6374
	Post-test
Rhythmic degree	Pre-test	0.41	2.056	-1.692	0.209	-0.505	50	0.1616
	Post-test