Accès libre

Research on the Teaching Reform Path of Colleges and Universities in Transportation and Water Transportation Education in the Era of Artificial Intelligence

  
05 févr. 2025
À propos de cet article

Citez
Télécharger la couverture

Figure 1.

Platform network structure
Platform network structure

Figure 2.

Platform architecture
Platform architecture

Figure 3.

Answer retrieve architecture graphic
Answer retrieve architecture graphic

Figure 4.

Three experiments were combined
Three experiments were combined

Add the experimental results of alternative keyword optimization

First set Second group Third group Fourth group Fifth group Sixth group Mean value
T1 0.690 0.770 0.640 0.770 0.690 0.740 0.717
T2 0.320 0.320 0.310 0.270 0.310 0.350 0.313
T3 0.941 0.921 0.951 0.957 0.858 0.975 0.934
T4 0.455 0.461 0.474 0.489 0.452 0.465 0.466

The experimental and the comparison of the course study are analyzed

Dimension Class Mean value Standard deviation T value Significance
Creative thinking Previous survey 13.908 3.61 -0.642 0.591
Laboratory class survey 13.952 3.207
Cooperative ability Previous survey 14.441 3.345 1.784 0.714
Laboratory class survey 14.275 3.339
Practical ability Previous survey 14.609 3.545 2.211 0.572
Laboratory class survey 14.425 3.656
Study interest Previous survey 15.286 3.339 2.931 0.463
Laboratory class survey 15.398 3.51
Scale analysis Previous survey 96.908 9.893 -0.055 0.974
Laboratory class survey 96.052 9.226

The results of the basic template and the direct participle

First set Second group Third group Fourth group Fifth group Sixth group Mean value
T1 0.810 0.810 0.770 0.840 0.770 0.850 0.808
T2 0.280 0.270 0.310 0.300 0.260 0.230 0.275
T3 0.920 1.000 0.977 0.958 0.927 0.960 0.957
T4 0.391 0.700 0.460 0.337 0.371 0.321 0.430

The experimental results of the optimized experiment of subject object

First set Second group Third group Fourth group Fifth group Sixth group Mean value
T1 0.740 0.760 0.710 0.810 0.740 0.810 0.762
T2 0.340 0.410 0.350 0.260 0.260 0.230 0.308
T3 0.932 0.968 0.928 0.959 0.891 0.952 0.938
T4 0.466 0.422 0.448 0.551 0.381 0.451 0.453

After the course study

Dimension Class Mean value Standard deviation T value Significance
Creative thinking Laboratory class survey 13.952 3.563 1.452 0.235
Laboratory test 13.918 3.16
Cooperative ability Laboratory class survey 14.425 3.298 1.673 0.019
Laboratory test 18.425 3.292
Practical ability Laboratory class survey 12.425 3.498 -3.952 0.037
Laboratory test 18.398 3.609
Study interest Laboratory class survey 15.286 3.292 -2.551 0.027
Laboratory test 18.398 3.463
Scale analysis Laboratory class survey 96.052 9.609 -3.154 0.032
Laboratory test 106.052 5.179

Comparison of the course learning in the pre-test of the comparison group

Dimension Class Mean value Standard deviation T value Significance
Creative thinking Control the pre-shift test 13.908 3.563 2.008 0.557
After the con shift test 13.797 3.16
Cooperative ability Control the pre-shift test 14.441 3.298 1.854 0.047
After the con shift test 16.275 3.292
Practical ability Control the pre-shift test 14.609 3.498 -4.052 0.034
After the con shift test 16.425 3.609
Study interest Control the pre-shift test 15.286 3.292 -2.545 0.029
After the con shift test 16.398 3.463
Scale analysis Control the pre-shift test 96.908 9.609 -1.121 0.041
After the con shift test 102.052 5.179

The study of the post-course study is compared

Dimension Class Mean value Standard deviation T value Significance
Creative thinking After the con shift test 13.918 1.682 1.575 0.213
Experimental class after test 13.797 1.826
Cooperative ability After the con shift test 16.275 2.287 1.834 0.029
Experimental class after test 18.275 2.036
Practical ability After the con shift test 16.425 2.291 -5.131 0.055
Experimental class after test 18.425 1.942
Study interest After the con shift test 16.398 2.14 -3.451 0.028
Experimental class after test 18.398 2.089
Scale analysis After the con shift test 102.052 1.649 -1.553 0.031
Experimental class after test 106.052 1.665