A Study of Using Deep Learning Technology to Improve the Accuracy of Polyphonic Singing in Community Choirs
et
03 févr. 2025
À propos de cet article
Publié en ligne: 03 févr. 2025
Reçu: 27 sept. 2024
Accepté: 29 déc. 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0036
Mots clés
© 2025 Yue Li et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Matched sample statistics
Dimension | Mean | SD | N | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pair 1 | Pretest | Singing ability | 2.84 | 0.536 | 20 |
Posttest | 3.66 | 0.475 | 20 | ||
Pair 2 | Pretest | Breath control | 2.34 | 0.526 | 20 |
Posttest | 4.16 | 0.511 | 20 | ||
Pair 3 | Pretest | Timeliness | 2.33 | 0.475 | 20 |
Posttest | 3.87 | 0.463 | 20 | ||
Pair 4 | Pretest | Rhythm | 2.96 | 0.369 | 20 |
Posttest | 4.08 | 0.529 | 20 | ||
Pair 5 | Pretest | Chorus ability | 2.63 | 0.511 | 20 |
Posttest | 3.87 | 0.414 | 20 | ||
Pair 6 | Pretest | Expressiveness | 2.76 | 0.332 | 20 |
Posttest | 4.11 | 0.442 | 20 |
Matched sample
Pair difference | 95% confidence interval | t | df | Sig.(2-tail) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | Standard error mean | Lower limit | Upper limit | |||||
Pair 1 | Singing ability | -0.82 | 0.236 | 0.756 | 1.236 | 3.641 | 8 | 0.000 |
Pair 2 | Breath control | -1.82 | 0.254 | 1.423 | 2.341 | 6.324 | 8 | 0.001 |
Pair 3 | Timeliness | -1.54 | 0.187 | 0.789 | 1.254 | 3.214 | 8 | 0.000 |
Pair 4 | Rhythm | -1.12 | 0.236 | 0.741 | 1.274 | 5.321 | 8 | 0.003 |
Pair 5 | Chorus ability | -1.24 | 0.255 | 0.755 | 1.149 | 5.412 | 8 | 0.002 |
Pair 6 | Expressiveness | -1.35 | 0.214 | 0.763 | 1.254 | 6.102 | 8 | 0.000 |