Modernization of Intellectual Property Discipline Governance Based on Multivariate Statistical Analysis Towards the Construction of a Powerful Intellectual Property Country

[1] Galasso, A. (2019). Rewards versus intellectual property rights when commitment is limited. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 169. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Aaron, E. (2020). Scattered and unsystematic: the taught discipline in the intellectual life of international relations. International Studies Perspectives(3), 3. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Charney, & Igal. (2015). Downtown redevelopment and land-use regulation: can planning policies discipline property development?. Land Use Policy. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Dunagan, J., & Halbert, D. (2015). Intellectual property for the neurocentric age: towards a neuropolitics of ip. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 5(3), 302-326. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Ba-Jun, F. U., & University, S. (2017). The reformation of discipline system and the construction of higher education——reconsideration on higher education being the first-level discipline. Journal of Higher Education. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Ran, X. (2014). The national key discipline approval system:historical review and transition path. Journal of Higher Education. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Huang, Y., & Wang, X. (2017). Building an efficient financial system in china: a need for stronger market discipline. Asian Economic Policy Review, 12(2). Search in Google Scholar

[8] Davenport, S., Carr, A., & Bibby, D. (2010). Leveraging talent: spin–off strategy at industrial research. R&D Management, 32(3). Search in Google Scholar

[9] Irena, Hutton, Danling, Jiang, Alok, & Kumar. (2015). Political values, culture, and corporate litigation. Management Science. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Ray, S. R. P. K. (2021). Innovation strategy of latecomer firms under tight appropriability regimes: the indian pharmaceuticals industry. Journal of international management, 27(1). Search in Google Scholar

[11] Niculescu, M. F., Wu, D. J., & Xu, L. (2018). Strategic intellectual property sharing: competition on an open technology platform under network effects. Information Systems Research, 29(2), 498-519. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Konara, P., Batsakis, G., & Shirodkar, V. (2022). ‘distance’ in intellectual property protection and mnes’ foreign subsidiary innovation performance. Journal of product innovation management. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Chen, Y. J., & Lu, T. J. (2019). Intellectual property strategy for the ecosystem of the internet of things. International Journal of Technology Management, 80(3/4), 212. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Prihastomo, Y., Kosala, R., Supangkat, S. H., Ranti, B., & Trisetyarso, A. (2019). Theoretical framework of smart intellectual property office in developing countries. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 994-1001. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Liu, Z., Mu, R., Hu, S., Wang, L., & Wang, S. (2018). Intellectual property protection, technological innovation and enterprise value-an empirical study on panel data of 80 advanced manufacturing smes. Cognitive Systems Research, 52(DEC.), 741-746. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Jee, S. J., & Sohn, S. Y. (2021). Perceived importance of intellectual property protection methods by korean smes involved in product innovation and their value appropriation. Journal of Small Business Management(4), 1-27. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Yang, Y., & Zhao, T. (2019). Intellectual property review: enlightenment for the “double first-rate” construction - “double first-rate” discipline construction of willow glass and print optoelectronics at wuhan university of technology. Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology.(S9), 125. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Papageorgiadis, N., Mcdonald, F., Wang, C., & Konara, P. (2019). The characteristics of intellectual property rights regimes: how formal and informal institutions affect outward fdi location. International Business Review, 29(1). Search in Google Scholar