Analysis and Comparison of Limitation Interests in Civil Procedure Law in the Context of Information Technology

[1] Fortes, P. R. B. (2020). Paths to digital justice: Judicial robots, algorithmic decision-making, and due process. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 7(3), 453-469. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Donoghue, J. (2017). The rise of digital justice: Courtroom technology, public participation and access to justice. The Modern Law Review, 80(6), 995-1025. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Sela, A. (2019). e-Nudging justice: the role of digital choice architecture in online courts. J. Disp. Resol., 127. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Ebner, N., & Greenberg, E. E. (2020). Strengthening online dispute resolution justice. Wash. UJL & Pol’y, 63, 65. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Brobst, J. A. (2017). The Modern Penny Dreadful: Public Prosecution and the Need for Litigation Privacy in a Digital Age. Neb. L. Rev., 96, 281. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Alim, A. (2018). Corruption in civil litigation system: An approach to judicial reform in Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Law and Economics, 9(2), 20170027. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Jacobsen, G., & de, Macedo, Dias, B. (2023). Smart dispute resolution: Artificial intelligence to reduce litigation. Suprema-Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, 3(1), 391-414. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Sela, A., & Gabay-Egozi, L. (2020). Judicial Procedural Involvement (JPI): A Metric for Judges’ Role in Civil Litigation, Settlement, and Access to Justice. Journal of Law and Society, 47(3), 468-498. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kramer, X. E., van, Gelder, E., & Themeli, E. (2018). e-Justice in the Netherlands: the Rocky Road to Digitised Justice. Digital Single Market: Bausteine eines Rechts in der Digitalen Welt, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018, 209-235. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Aouidef, Y., Ast, F., & Deffains, B. (2021). Decentralized justice: A comparative analysis of blockchain online dispute resolution projects. Frontiers in Blockchain, 4, 3. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Barnett, J., & Treleaven, P. (2018). Algorithmic dispute resolution—The automation of professional dispute resolution using AI and blockchain technologies. The Computer Journal, 61(3), 399-408. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Christian, G. (2019). Predictive Coding: Adopting and Adapting Artificial Intelligence in Civil Litigation. Can. B. Rev., 97, 486. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Churakova, E. N. (2021). Civil Litigation Principles Transformation in Sight of Digitalization Impact on Legal Culture. Current Achievements, Challenges and Digital Chances of Knowledge Based Economy, 693-697. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Cashman, P., & Ginnivan, E. (2019). Digital justice: Online resolution of minor civil disputes and the use of digital technology in complex litigation and class actions. Macquarie LJ, 19, 39. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Ontanu, E. A. (2019). Adapting Justice to Technology and Technology to Justice: A Coevolution Process to e-Justice in Cross-border Litigation. European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities, 8(2), 54-74. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Kurniawan, M. B. (2020). Implementation Of Electronic Trial (E-Litigation) On The Civil Cases In Indonesia Court As A Legal Renewal Of Civil Procedural Law. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 9(1), 43-70. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Gebregiorgs, M. T. (2018). The role of public interest litigation in the achievement of sustainable waste management in Ethiopia. Sustainability, 10(12), 4735. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Tsai, H. S., Lee, T. L., Hsuan, C. F., & Liang, H. W. (2022). Impact of the medical care act amendment on the medical malpractice litigation in Taiwan. Medicine, 101(46). Search in Google Scholar