Acceso abierto

Sensitivity Analysis of the Waterproof Performance of Elastic Rubber Gasket in Shield Tunnel

Zhiqiang Wang

Zhiqiang Wang

  • Institute of Rail Transit, Tongji UniversityShanghai, China
  • Shanghai Key Laboratory of Rail Infrastructure Durability and System SafetyShanghai, China
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Wang, Zhiqiang
 y 
Zhenyu Lei

Zhenyu Lei

  • Institute of Rail Transit, Tongji UniversityShanghai, China
  • Shanghai Key Laboratory of Rail Infrastructure Durability and System SafetyShanghai, China
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Lei, Zhenyu
  
22 mar 2021
Sensitivity Analysis of the Waterproof Performance of Elastic Rubber Gasket in Shield Tunnel's Cover Image
Acerca de este artículo
Artículo anterior
Artículo siguiente
Cite
Descargar portada
Publicado en línea: 22 mar 2021
Recibido: 01 dic 2020
Aceptado: 31 ene 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2021.1.00013
Palabras clave
© 2024 Zhiqiang Wang et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Fig. 1

Comparison of the product and design drawings of two manufacturers (Note: dotted line refers to the design drawing): (a) No.1 product of manufacturers, (b) No.2 product of manufacturers.
Comparison of the product and design drawings of two manufacturers (Note: dotted line refers to the design drawing): (a) No.1 product of manufacturers, (b) No.2 product of manufacturers.

Fig. 2

ANSYS-PDS analysis process.
ANSYS-PDS analysis process.

Fig. 3

The sizes of the gasket and groove/mm.
The sizes of the gasket and groove/mm.

Fig. 4

Unilateral compress FE model of the rubber gasket.
Unilateral compress FE model of the rubber gasket.

Fig. 5

Trends of average contact stresses:(a) Average contact stress on the bottom surface, (b) Average contact stress on the upper surface.
Trends of average contact stresses:(a) Average contact stress on the bottom surface, (b) Average contact stress on the upper surface.

Fig. 6

The sensitivity influence of rubber hardness tolerance (Only list the top five variables with great influence):(a) Average contact stress on the bottom surface, (b) Average contact stress on the upper surface.
The sensitivity influence of rubber hardness tolerance (Only list the top five variables with great influence):(a) Average contact stress on the bottom surface, (b) Average contact stress on the upper surface.

Fig. 7

The sensitivity influence of horizontal position deviation:(a) Average contact stress on the bottom surface, (b) Average contact stress on the upper surface.
The sensitivity influence of horizontal position deviation:(a) Average contact stress on the bottom surface, (b) Average contact stress on the upper surface.

Fig. 8

The sensitivity influence of aperture deviation:(a) Average contact stress on the bottom surface, (b) Average contact stress on the upper surface.
The sensitivity influence of aperture deviation:(a) Average contact stress on the bottom surface, (b) Average contact stress on the upper surface.
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
1 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Ciencias de la vida, Ciencias de la vida, otros, Matemáticas, Matemáticas aplicadas, Matemáticas generales, Física, Física, otros
RSS Feed de revista