Research on the Optimization of Intelligent English Vocabulary Teaching Paths Based on Reinforcement Learning Models
y
29 sept 2025
Acerca de este artículo
Publicado en línea: 29 sept 2025
Recibido: 06 ene 2025
Aceptado: 27 abr 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-1135
Palabras clave
© 2025 Xuefen Shi and Jinli Pan, published by Sciendo.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

System advantages and disadvantages survey
| Issue number | Part of the learner’s feedback |
|---|---|
| 9 | The system is more flexible than the English class four lexical learning software on the market |
| The system can analyze my vocabulary and recommend my vocabulary | |
| The system can recommend me the vocabulary resources that I am interested in | |
| This system will improve my motivation to learn English four words | |
| This system will improve my efficiency of learning English four words | |
| 10 | The department of lexical resources can increase the English interpretation of words |
| The system can increase the number of words |
The comparison of the model and its model(k=9)
| Data set | Evaluation index | BPR | Q-Learning | NeuCF | FPMC | DDPRG | This model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yelp | Precision@9 | 0.0399 | 0.0397 | 0.0701 | 0.1021 | 0.1028 | 0.1162 |
| Recall@9 | 0.1581 | 0.2106 | 0.5185 | 0.5002 | 0.5225 | 0.5453 | |
| NDCG@9 | 0.1362 | 0.2268 | 0.3234 | 0.3931 | 0.4006 | 0.4070 | |
| MovieLens | Precision@9 | 0.0297 | 0.0406 | 0.0804 | 0.1148 | 0.1258 | 0.1357 |
| Recall@9 | 0.1581 | 0.1400 | 0.4988 | 0.5057 | 0.5486 | 0.5852 | |
| NDCG@9 | 0.2782 | 0.1511 | 0.3438 | 0.4052 | 0.4255 | 0.4441 | |
| Last.fm | Precision@9 | 0.0962 | 0.0706 | 0.0985 | 0.1355 | 0.1446 | 0.1574 |
| Recall@9 | 0.3361 | 0.1506 | 0.5059 | 0.5258 | 0.5335 | 0.5454 | |
| NDCG@9 | 0.3447 | 0.1900 | 0.3672 | 0.3762 | 0.3868 | 0.3990 |
The comparison of the model and its model(k=7)
| Data set | Evaluation index | BPR | Q-Learning | NeuCF | FPMC | DDPRG | This model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yelp | Precision@7 | 0.0394 | 0.0202 | 0.0951 | 0.1284 | 0.1772 | 0.1954 |
| Recall@7 | 0.1866 | 0.0998 | 0.5563 | 0.5235 | 0.5569 | 0.6025 | |
| NDCG@7 | 0.2652 | 0.2685 | 0.3856 | 0.4314 | 0.4460 | 0.4752 | |
| MovieLens | Precision@7 | 0.0559 | 0.0523 | 0.1270 | 0.1256 | 0.1555 | 0.1753 |
| Recall@7 | 0.2570 | 0.1686 | 0.5632 | 0.4684 | 0.5473 | 0.6249 | |
| NDCG@7 | 0.1588 | 0.1242 | 0.3999 | 0.3991 | 0.4525 | 0.5004 | |
| Last.fm | Precision@7 | 0.1251 | 0.1025 | 0.1400 | 0.1634 | 0.1800 | 0.2063 |
| Recall@7 | 0.4112 | 0.3000 | 0.5257 | 0.5570 | 0.5782 | 0.6034 | |
| NDCG@7 | 0.2594 | 0.2067 | 0.3764 | 0.3994 | 0.4090 | 0.4583 |
The comparison of the model and its model(k=5)
| Data set | Evaluation index | BPR | Q-Learning | NeuCF | FPMC | DDPRG | This model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yelp | Precision@5 | 0.0450 | 0.0398 | 0.0784 | 0.0995 | 0.1152 | 0.1258 |
| Recall@5 | 0.1582 | 0.2244 | 0.5215 | 0.4954 | 0.5461 | 0.5753 | |
| NDCG@5 | 0.1358 | 0.2358 | 0.3353 | 0.3869 | 0.4026 | 0.4345 | |
| MovieLens | Precision@5 | 0.0302 | 0.0501 | 0.0892 | 0.1261 | 0.1356 | 0.1450 |
| Recall@5 | 0.1154 | 0.1496 | 0.5067 | 0.5598 | 0.5895 | 0.5984 | |
| NDCG@5 | 0.2786 | 0.1582 | 0.3598 | 0.4061 | 0.4452 | 0.4566 | |
| Last.fm | Precision@5 | 0.0958 | 0.0775 | 0.1064 | 0.1257 | 0.1483 | 0.1660 |
| Recall@5 | 0.3359 | 0.1594 | 0.5252 | 0.5240 | 0.5356 | 0.5584 | |
| NDCG@5 | 0.3452 | 0.1961 | 0.3796 | 0.3859 | 0.3891 | 0.4060 |
The comparison of the model and its model(k=3)
| Data set | Evaluation index | BPR | Q-Learning | NeuCF | FPMC | DDPRG | This model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yelp | Precision@3 | 0.0411 | 0.0424 | 0.0810 | 0.0897 | 0.0961 | 0.1159 |
| Recall@3 | 0.1769 | 0.2458 | 0.5372 | 0.5076 | 0.5305 | 0.5522 | |
| NDCG@3 | 0.1595 | 0.2406 | 0.3598 | 0.3654 | 0.3819 | 0.4021 | |
| MovieLens | Precision@3 | 0.0524 | 0.0525 | 0.0993 | 0.0922 | 0.1100 | 0.1257 |
| Recall@3 | 0.1953 | 0.1581 | 0.4988 | 0.5357 | 0.5404 | 0.5543 | |
| NDCG@3 | 0.3161 | 0.3005 | 0.3685 | 0.4024 | 0.4299 | 0.4367 | |
| Last.fm | Precision@3 | 0.0908 | 0.0851 | 0.1142 | 0.1202 | 0.1328 | 0.1453 |
| Recall@3 | 0.3459 | 0.1953 | 0.5025 | 0.4953 | 0.5204 | 0.5402 | |
| NDCG@3 | 0.3530 | 0.2006 | 0.3680 | 0.3588 | 0.3975 | 0.4099 |
