Study on the Path of High Quality Enhancement of International Communication Effectiveness of Rural Revitalization Literature in the Age of Digital Intelligence
y
26 sept 2025
Acerca de este artículo
Publicado en línea: 26 sept 2025
Recibido: 01 feb 2025
Aceptado: 11 may 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-1083
Palabras clave
© 2025 Yejin Lin et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Necessity analysis results
| Condition | Result variable (ISE) | |
|---|---|---|
| Consistency | Coverage | |
| CT | 0.70822 | 0.72977 |
| Without CT | 0.54455 | 0.57754 |
| SM | 0.71305 | 0.75116 |
| Without SM | 0.57797 | 0.58478 |
| TN | 0.779 | 0.71846 |
| Without TN | 0.49132 | 0.57515 |
| WF | 0.78408 | 0.77033 |
| Without WF | 0.49516 | 0.53558 |
| ET | 0.75262 | 0.76595 |
| Without ET | 0.51143 | 0.54202 |
| NP | 0.69117 | 0.77548 |
| Without NP | 0.60102 | 0.59035 |
Truth table(partial)
| ISE | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | M5 | M6 | |
| CT | • | • | ||||
| SM | • | ● | ● | ● | ● | |
| TN | ● | ● | ● | • | ||
| WF | • | ● | ● | ● | ||
| ET | • | • | ● | ● | ● | |
| NP | • | ● | ● | • | ● | |
| Primary coverage | 0.485 | 0.501 | 0.468 | 0.478 | 0.495 | 0.415 |
| Net coverage | 0.013 | 0.015 | 0.025 | 0.032 | 0.028 | 0.013 |
| Consistency | 0.905 | 0.913 | 0.916 | 0.909 | 0.906 | 0.922 |
| Combination coverage | 0.642 | |||||
| Combination consistency | 0.859 | |||||
Data calibration results(partial)
| Number of cases | CT | SM | TN | WF | ET | NP | ISE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.73 | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.77 | 0.35 | 0.50 | 0.23 |
| 2 | 0.52 | 0.26 | 0.38 | 0.35 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.26 |
| 3 | 0.72 | 0.34 | 0.16 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.19 |
| 4 | 0.72 | 0.40 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.43 |
| 5 | 0.94 | 0.83 | 0.38 | 0.51 | 0.65 | 0.43 | 0.37 |
| 6 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.47 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 0.43 |
| 7 | 0.02 | 0.23 | 0.39 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.04 |
| 8 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.07 |
| 9 | 0.09 | 0.33 | 0.36 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.06 |
| … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … |
| 556 | 0.18 | 0.28 | 0.04 | 0.21 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.01 |
Variable data calibration anchor
| CT | SM | TN | WF | ET | NP | ISE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Completely non-membership point | 1.672 | 2.012 | 2.207 | 1.824 | 1.797 | 2.000 | 2.000 |
| Fuzzy membership | 4.000 | 4.314 | 4.169 | 3.816 | 3.800 | 4.000 | 3.802 |
| Full membership | 5.000 | 5.000 | 4.838 | 4.802 | 4.790 | 5.000 | 4.800 |
Indicator overall influence
| Di | Ci | Mi | Ri | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 4.506 | 4.269 | 8.775 | 0.237 |
| A2 | 4.421 | 4.190 | 8.611 | 0.231 |
| A3 | 3.528 | 3.518 | 7.046 | 0.01 |
| A4 | 4.314 | 3.807 | 8.121 | 0.507 |
| A5 | 4.212 | 4.168 | 8.38 | 0.044 |
| A6 | 2.762 | 4.079 | 6.841 | -1.317 |
| A7 | 4.210 | 3.204 | 7.414 | 1.006 |
| A8 | 4.057 | 3.728 | 7.785 | 0.329 |
| A9 | 2.047 | 2.753 | 4.8 | -0.706 |
| B1 | 3.446 | 3.805 | 7.251 | -0.359 |
| B2 | 3.414 | 2.796 | 6.21 | 0.618 |
| B3 | 3.365 | 3.632 | 6.997 | -0.267 |
| B4 | 3.123 | 3.028 | 6.151 | 0.095 |
| B5 | 3.563 | 3.462 | 7.025 | 0.101 |
| B6 | 3.528 | 2.743 | 6.271 | 0.785 |
| B7 | 3.554 | 3.505 | 7.059 | 0.049 |
| B8 | 3.346 | 3.593 | 6.939 | -0.247 |
| B9 | 3.026 | 3.074 | 6.1 | -0.048 |
| B10 | 3.282 | 3.420 | 6.702 | -0.138 |
Configuration analysis results
| ISE | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | M5 | M6 | |
| CT | • | • | ||||
| SM | • | ● | ● | ● | ● | |
| TN | ● | ● | ● | • | ||
| WF | • | ● | ● | ● | ||
| ET | • | • | ● | ● | ● | |
| NP | • | ● | ● | • | ● | |
| Primary coverage | 0.485 | 0.501 | 0.468 | 0.478 | 0.495 | 0.415 |
| Net coverage | 0.013 | 0.015 | 0.025 | 0.032 | 0.028 | 0.013 |
| Consistency | 0.905 | 0.913 | 0.916 | 0.909 | 0.906 | 0.922 |
| Combination coverage | 0.642 | |||||
| Combination consistency | 0.859 | |||||
