Construction of Teaching Innovation Team Building System for Higher Vocational Teachers in the Context of Skill-based Society in Information Age

Figure 1.

Expert judgment matrix of first-level components

	Teaching attitudeA	Teaching methodB	Teaching abilityC	Teaching effectD
Teaching attitudeA	1	1/5	1/3	1/5
Teaching methodB	5	1	1/2	3
Teaching abilityC	3	2	1	3
Teaching effectD	5	1/3	1/3	1

Descriptive analysis of elements of teaching attitude evaluation

Question	Sample size	Minimum value	Maximum value	Mean value	Standard deviation
Q1	278	1	5	4.15	0.96
Q2	278	1	5	4.32	0.88
Q3	278	1	5	4.09	0.97
Q4	210	1	5	4.09	0.78
Q5	210	1	5	3.84	0.72
Q6	210	1	5	3.92	0.81

Initial table to be associated

Student evaluation	Teacher evaluation	Evaluation level
48	49	Relatively satisfactory
47.7	48.3	Relatively satisfactory
23.7	24.1	Less satisfied
36.5	36.9	general
13	15	Very dissatisfied
……	……

Evaluation table after generalization of data

Student evaluation	Teacher evaluation	Evaluation level
Good	Good	Relatively satisfactory
Intermediate	Good	Relatively satisfactory
Poor	Poor	Less satisfied
Poor	Poor	general
Poor	Poor	Very dissatisfied
……	……

Weight of constituent elements at all levels of student evaluation system

First-order component weight	Secondary component weight
A1 0.1455	B1 0.0826
	B2 0.0372
	B3 0.0257
A2 0.1533	B4 0.0893
	B5 0.0401
	B6 0.0239
A3 0.3715	B7 0.1399
	B8 0.1182
	B9 0.1134
A4 0.3297	B10 0.1203
	B11 0.1105
	B12 0.0989

Evaluation indicators of students’ evaluation of teaching

Evaluation subject	Primary index	Secondary index
Student evaluation of teachingA	Teaching attitudeA1	Love their work, be a teacher, teach peopleA1-1
		Carefully prepare lessons, teach, organize classroom discussion, tutoring, practice and other teaching linksA1-2
		Care and strict requirements for students, humbly listen to all opinions, and constantly improve the level of teachingA1-3
	Teaching methodA2	Teaching effective practice, clear organization, able to understand the simple, the focus is prominent, the difficult problems to talk deeplyA2-1
		The blackboard writing is clear, the arrangement is reasonable, the detail is appropriate, the lecture is clear, the language is vivid, the speed is moderateA2-2
		The theoretical contact practice, for example, is appropriate and appliedA2-3
	Teaching abilityA3	Constantly enrich and update the teaching content, absorb the new research results in the professional field, reflect the new trend of teaching reform, and have a sense of innovationA3-1
		Teach students according to their aptitude, take the trouble to answer students’ questions, and help students solve difficult problemsA3-2
		Pay attention to the combination of imparting knowledge and cultivating ability, appropriate encouragement and guidance, and consciously strengthen the cultivation of students’ vocational skillsA3-3
	Teaching effectA4	After learning this course, students have a good grasp of the book knowledge and the basic requirements of the curriculum standardsA4-1
		After learning this course, it will help students to improve their ability to analyze and solve problemsA4-2
		After learning this course, students can improve their self-learning abilityA4-3

Frequent item set and support Number of supported items

Student evaluation			Teacher evaluation
Frequent item set	Support degree	Support number	Frequent item set	Support degree	Support number
Student evaluation=Optimal	0.4	160	Student evaluation=Optimal	0.3	120
Student evaluation=Good	0.6	240	Student evaluation=Good	0.6	240
Evaluation level=Highly satisfied	0.5	200	Evaluation level=Highly satisfied	0.4	160
Evaluation level=Relatively satisfactory	0.7	280	Evaluation level=Relatively satisfactory	0.6	240
Student evaluation=Optimal, Evaluation level=Highly satisfied	0.4	120	Student evaluation=Optimal, Evaluation level=Highly satisfied	0.3	100
Student evaluation=Good, Evaluation level=Highly satisfied	0.6	160	Student evaluation=Good, Evaluation level=Highly satisfied	0.3	100
Student evaluation=Good, Evaluation level=Relatively satisfactory	0.6	160	Student evaluation=Good, Evaluation level=Relatively satisfactory	0.5	140

Evaluation indicators of peer attendance

Evaluation subject	Primary index	Secondary index
Peer lectureB	Teaching attitudeB1	Academic rigorous, as a teacher, strict attendance, teaching and educating peopleB1-1
		Familiar with the curriculum standards, proficient in the content, fully prepared for the lessonB1-2
		Warm-hearted counseling students, take the trouble to help students solve difficult problemsB1-3
	Teaching methodB2	The language expression is clear and concise, and the blackboard writing is neat and standardizedB2-1
		According to the characteristics of teaching content, appropriate teaching AIDS and a variety of teaching techniques are adopted to teach, and attention is paid to guiding students to transform knowledge into abilityB2-2
		For the whole body, can better maintain the class order, pay attention to feedback adjustment, astutely deal with accidental eventsB2-3
	Teaching abilityB3	The teaching objectives are in line with the actual situation of students, the content is full, no knowledge mistakes, and the required teaching skills are skilledB3-1
		The regulations are clear, the focus is prominent, the difficult problems are seized and solved, and the requirements of “necessary and sufficient” are paid attention toB3-2
		Pay attention to absorb the new information of the development of the professional field (discipline), update the teaching content, and provide valuable information in the classroomB3-3
	Teaching effectB4	The teaching process is compact and time allocation is appropriateB4-1
		The correct rate of oral answering, classroom exercises and written assignments is higherB4-2
		To complete the teaching task on time and achieve the teaching purpose, students at all levels have gained something, and the teaching reflects wellB4-3

Reliability of components of teaching quality evaluation system

Constituent element	Cronbacha ɑ		Number of terms
	Student evaluation	Teacher evaluation	Student evaluation	Teacher evaluation
Teaching attitude evaluation	0.942	0.951	3	3
Teaching method evaluation	0.979	0.968	3	3
Teaching ability evaluation	0.932	0.978	3	3
Teaching effect evaluation	0.957	0.954	3	3
Total	0.985	0.988	12	12

Conversion standards of Evaluation dimension

Evaluation dimension	After generalization grade
Score≥54	Optimal
48≤Score<54	Good
42≤Score<48	Intermediate
Score<42	Poor