Construction and Model Application of Evaluation System of Business English Civic Education Based on Traditional Culture

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Ideological and political evaluation index system based on CIPP model

Level 1 indicators	Level 2 indicators
Curriculum background	Course orientation
	Course objectives
Course investment	Human resources
	Course resources
	Financial resources
Curriculum implementation	Teaching preparation
	Teaching process
	Learning process
Course effect	Teaching effect
	Course impact

Model summaryk

Model	R	R2	Adjusted R2	Standard error	significance	Durbin-Wat son(U)
1	.645a	.442	.441	.221	.000
2	.711b	.563	.562	.201	.000
3	.784c	.573	.571	.189	.000
4	.812d	.614	.612	.183	.000
5	.701e	.645	.643	.178	.000
6	.831f	.664	.662	.181	.000
7	.676g	.671	.669	.181	.000
8	.877h	.673	.671	.185	.000
9	.731i	.678	.675	.180	.000
10	.782j	.724	.720	.180	.000	1.783

Coefficient a

	Nonnormalized coefficient		Normalization factor	t	significance	Common linear statistics
	B	Standard error	β			Admissible	VIF
Constants	3.132	.011		156.131	.000
Course orientation	.081	.023	.205	4.138	.000	.328	2.619
Course objectives	.120	.020	.228	3.889	.000	.263	2.910
Human resources	.096	.028	.199	3.490	.000	.314	3.873
Course resources	.047	.017	.194	4.259	.000	.402	2.662
Financial resources	.076	.023	.140	3.373	.000	.246	3.082
Teaching preparation	.093	.020	.211	3.296	.000	.337	2.490
Teaching process	.086	.022	.101	2.852	.000	.257	3.805
Learning process	.045	.026	.089	6.476	.000	.329	3.048
Teaching effect	.029	.017	.157	2.589	.000	.242	3.184
Course impact	.075	.029	.061	5.344	.000	.384	2.601

Independent sample inspection

		F	Significance	t	Freedom	significance
Course orientation	Homogeneity of variance has been assumed	11.654	.657	2.352	334	.057
	Homogeneity of the variance was not assumed			2.251	132.613	.061
Course objectives	Homogeneity of variance has been assumed	14.451	.173	3.372	334	.001
	Homogeneity of the variance was not assumed			3.674	141.43	.005
Human resources	Homogeneity of variance has been assumed	3.673	.356	1.853	334	.053
	Homogeneity of the variance was not assumed			1.654	149.217	.047
Course resources	Homogeneity of variance has been assumed	2.782	.000	1.872	334	.001
	Homogeneity of the variance was not assumed			1.543	152.632	.011
Financial resources	Homogeneity of variance has been assumed	.764	.275	2.542	334	.022
	Homogeneity of the variance was not assumed			2.757	156.764	.001
Teaching preparation	Homogeneity of variance has been assumed	2.452	.000	3.537	334	.065
	Homogeneity of the variance was not assumed			3.784	164.935	.002
Teaching process	Homogeneity of variance has been assumed	10.653	.000	1.685	334	.001
	Homogeneity of the variance was not assumed			1.574	177.262	.001
Learning process	Homogeneity of variance has been assumed	8.543	.000	3.545	334	.031
	Homogeneity of the variance was not assumed			3.672	185.434	.001
Teaching effect	Homogeneity of variance has been assumed	4.21	.000	1.856	334	.021
	Homogeneity of the variance was not assumed			1.426	191.653	.001
Course impact	Homogeneity of variance has been assumed	9.753	.000	2.673	334	.023
	Homogeneity of the variance was not assumed			2.572	198.542	.003

The coefficient of internal consistency of the questionnaire

	Cronbach’sα	Problem number
Curriculum background	0.842	8
Course investment	0.885	10
Curriculum implementation	0.852	9
Course effect	0.879	9
The α number of the total questionnaire	0.891	36

Overall evaluation of the correlation

Dimension	Correlation coefficient
Course orientation	Pearson correlation	0.652**
	Significance (double tail)	.000
Course objectives	Pearson correlation	0.778**
	Significance (double tail)	.000
Human resources	Pearson correlation	0.672**
	Significance (double tail)	.000
Course resources	Pearson correlation	0.834**
	Significance (double tail)	.000
Financial resources	Pearson correlation	0.698**
	Significance (double tail)	.000
Teaching preparation	Pearson correlation	0.753**
	Significance (double tail)	.000
Teaching process	Pearson correlation	0.865**
	Significance (double tail)	.000
Learning process	Pearson correlation	0.812**
	Significance (double tail)	.000
Teaching effect	Pearson correlation	0.731**
	Significance (double tail)	.000
Course impact	Pearson correlation	0.792**
	Significance (double tail)	.000

The weight of ideological and political education evaluation index

Level 1 indicators	Final weight	Level 2 indicators	Final weight
Curriculum background	0.0832	Course orientation	0.3671
		Course objectives	0.6329
Course investment	0.2976	Human resources	0.2482
		Course resources	0.5741
		Financial resources	0.1777
Curriculum implementation	0.4354	Teaching preparation	0.2286
		Teaching process	0.3537
		Learning process	0.4177
Course effect	0.1838	Teaching effect	0.8352
		Course impact	0.1648

Data recovery and collation

Basic situation	Options	Frequency	Proportion(%)
Gender	Male	154	49.04
	Female	160	50.96
Grade	Freshman year	167	53.18
	Sophomore	123	39.17
	Junior	24	7.64
Majors	Humanities and social sciences	173	55.1
	Science and engineering	141	44.90
Biotically	Countryside	121	38.54
	Town	193	61.46
Whether there is a reflection on education	Yes	135	42.99
	No	179	57.01
Whether to participate in the thinking of political knowledge competition	Yes	186	59.24
	No	128	40.76
Whether to accept the thoughts of the political education course	Yes	257	81.85
	No	57	18.15

ANOVA analysis in different regions

		Sum of squares	df	Mean square	F	Significance
Course orientation	Intergroup	11.452	3	3.213	9.452	.000
	Within group	123.452	351	.343
	Total	134.904	352
Course objectives	Intergroup	12.671	3	3.784	6.432	.000
	Within group	131.734	351	.454
	Total	144.405	352
Human resources	Intergroup	7.573	3	2.367	5.351	.000
	Within group	138.656	351	.411
	Total	146.229	352
Course resources	Intergroup	12.442	3	3.452	4.212	.000
	Within group	143.631	351	.357
	Total	156.073	352
Financial resources	Intergroup	17.422	3	3.651	4.231	.000
	Within group	156.375	351	.355
	Total	173.797	352
Teaching preparation	Intergroup	10.572	3	3.641	6.322	.000
	Within group	167.542	351	.552
	Total	178.114	352
Teaching process	Intergroup	12.754	3	4.431	7.355	.000
	Within group	174.338	351	.414
	Total	187.092	352
Learning process	Intergroup	10.653	3	5.232	5.543	.000
	Within group	182.663	351	.562
	Total	193.316	352
Teaching effect	Intergroup	12.775	3	3.521	6.241	.000
	Within group	198.435	351	.435
	Total	211.21	352
Course impact	Intergroup	10.741	3	4.262	8.532	.000
	Within group	213.56	351	.351
	Total	224.301	352

Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation score

In general	Level 1 indicators	Score	Level 2 indicators	Score
Business English thinking policy education(72.0105)	Course background	67.4152	Course orientation	70.2451
			Course objectives	73.3764
	Course input	72.1756	Human resources	71.9522
			Course resources	72.5643
			Financial resources	72.4829
	Curriculum implementation	72.0845	Teaching preparation	72.4562
			Teaching process	71.7631
	Course effect	72.6731	Learning process	70.2478
			Teaching effect	72.5634
			Course impact	72.7211