The Humanistic Care of Public Space Design in Urban Renewal Projects in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
21 mar 2025
Acerca de este artículo
Publicado en línea: 21 mar 2025
Recibido: 26 nov 2024
Aceptado: 24 feb 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0647
Palabras clave
© 2025 Weiwei Hou, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Data on objective mood indicators
| Index | Test | Mean | SD | T | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Systolic pressure | Before experiment | 122.47 | 16.24 | 1.63 | 0.82 |
| After experiment | 122.65 | 15.63 | |||
| Diastolic pressure | Before experiment | 74.62 | 8.1 | 0.46 | 0.66 |
| After experiment | 74.32 | 8.27 | |||
| Heart rate | Before experiment | 73.16 | 7.36 | 2.14 | 0.004 |
| After experiment | 68.72 | 6.87 |
The evaluation index system of humanistic care in public space
| Target layer(A) | Criterion layer(B) | Symbol | Index layer(C) | Symbol |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The evaluation model of humanistic care in public space | Sensory perception | B1 | Overall visual impression | C1 |
| Environmental sound | C2 | |||
| Environmental odor | C3 | |||
| Spatial awareness | B2 | Occlusion | C4 | |
| Cleanliness | C5 | |||
| Degree of coordination | C6 | |||
| Comfort level | C7 | |||
| Spatial personality | C8 | |||
| Safety demand | B3 | Facility safety | C9 | |
| Boundary security | C10 | |||
| Traffic safety | C11 | |||
| Security management | C12 | |||
| Emotional need | B4 | Social convenience | C13 | |
| Privacy | C14 | |||
| Space energy | C15 | |||
| Behavioral demand | B5 | Space accessibility | C16 | |
| Infrastructure | C17 | |||
| Space scale | C18 | |||
| Space use form | C19 | |||
| Landscape characteristics | B6 | Landscape richness | C20 | |
| Landscape continuity | C21 | |||
| Ecological effect | C22 |