A new strategy for power monitoring data collection based on data mining and its role in improving prediction accuracy
, , , y
19 mar 2025
Acerca de este artículo
Publicado en línea: 19 mar 2025
Recibido: 16 nov 2024
Aceptado: 19 feb 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0551
Palabras clave
© 2025 Junpeng Zhao et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Different models of the evaluation indicators on public data set 2
Model | MAPE(%) | RMSE(MW) | MAE(MW) | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
LSTM | 3.67 | 320.4859 | 235.0074 | 0.9397 |
BiLSTM-Attention | 3.02 | 235.8231 | 171.6748 | 0.9762 |
Improve transformer | 1.40 | 124.5055 | 84.5468 | 0.9963 |
Evaluation indicators of different models in public data sets 1
Model | MAPE(%) | RMSE(MW) | MAE(MW) | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
LSTM | 2.96 | 281.0886 | 183.2736 | 0.9542 |
BiLSTM-Attention | 2.65 | 227.4795 | 161.2114 | 0.9701 |
Improve transformer | 1.03 | 85.4571 | 62.3925 | 0.9984 |
Anomalous data distribution
Abnormal value label | Date |
---|---|
5 | 2022/05 |
21 | 2019/12 |
63 | 2019/10 |
96 | 2019/07 |
108 | 2019/05 |
126 | 2021/09 |
143 | 2022/12 |
187 | 2023/10 |
202 | 2023/06 |
The results of different models in the real data set
Model | MAPE(%) | RMSE(MW) | MAE(MW) | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
LSTM | 5.23 | 683.7404 | 473.8774 | 0.9483 |
BiLSTM-Attention | 4.57 | 596.3083 | 426.4559 | 0.9583 |
Improve transformer | 4.15 | 496.1061 | 356.6518 | 0.9771 |