Numerical analysis of the impact of national macro-policies on the construction of key projects planned during the “First Five-Year Plan” period in Lanzhou City
, , y
17 mar 2025
Acerca de este artículo
Publicado en línea: 17 mar 2025
Recibido: 06 oct 2024
Aceptado: 03 feb 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0305
Palabras clave
© 2025 Lixin Wang et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

The bacon breaks down the result
| Weigh | 2×2DDEstimate | |
|---|---|---|
| Earlier Treatment vs. Later Comparison | 0.031 | -11.274 |
| Later Treatment vs. Earlier Comparison | 0.032 | -5.867 |
| Treatment vs. Nevertreated | 0.927 | -40.972 |
Test result
| Unmatched | Mean | %reduct | t-test | V(T)/ V(C) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Matched | Treated | Control | %bias | |bias| | t | p>|t| | |
| tis2_1_w | U | 44.943 | 45.549 | 9 | 78.3 | 2.43 | 0.009 | 0.96 |
| M | 45.003 | 46.957 | -1.9 | -0.32 | 0.698 | 1.04 | ||
| tis3_1_w | U | 37.349 | 37.642 | 12.5 | 83.0 | 3.5 | 0.000 | 1.53 |
| M | 36.974 | 38.491 | 1.8 | 0.32 | 0.697 | 1.39 |
||
| Lnpop_z | U | 2.5142 | 3.9627 | 28.2 | 88.4 | 7.56 | 0 | 1.71 |
| M | 2.4841 | 4.1891 | 1.1 | 0.46 | 0.6 | 1.89 |
||
| Lar_z | U | 30.155 | 21.021 | 31.6 | 86.4 | 10.39 | 0 | 6.65 |
| M | 24.14 | 27.095 | -2.8 | -0.88 | 0.326 | 0.99 | ||
| Vest_z | U | 70.38 | 75.664 | 9-.1 | 35.1 | -2.51 | 0.01 | 1.11 |
| M | 71.897 | 75.852 | -5.1 | -1.2 | 0.197 | 1.14 |
||
| Gov_z | U | 13.712 | 17.96 | -22.3 | 90.0 | -5.43 | 0 | 0.9 |
| M | 13.867 | 15.8 | -1.2 | -0.33 | 0.689 | 1.18 |
||
| Fdi_z | U | 1.1911 | 0.0606 | -27.5 | 88.1 | 6.23 | 0.000 | 1.05 |
| M | 1.2254 | 1.5642 | -1.3 | -0.42 | 0.541 | 0.78 |
||
| Edu_z | U | 1.1645 | 1.5322 | 24.1 | 96.3 | 7.29 | 0.000 | 1.38 |
| M | 1.1472 | 1.8954 | -0.2 | -0.45 | 0.586 | 0.92 | ||
| Tec_z | U | .19864 | .19379 | 9.7 | 75.2 | 2.59 | 0.000 | 0.96 |
| M | .20847 | .21268 | 2.2 | 0.42 | 0.592 | 0.95 | ||
| Reta_z | U | 32.505 | 35.863 | -10.8 | 80.2 | -3.05 | 0.002 | 1.45 |
| M | 32.607 | 34.076 | 1.5 | 0.31 | 0.667 | 1.48 |
||
| Save_z | U | 68.679 | 74.2 | -10.4 | 91.0 | -2.92 | 0.003 | 1.43 |
| M | 68.793 | 70.26 | 0.9 | 0.09 | 0.832 | 1.58 |
||
| Fin_z | U | 89.648 | 90.275 | 1.7 | 151.2 | 0.37 | 0.621 | 0.78 |
| M | 88.683 | 93.236 | -3.2 | -0.82 | 0.348 | 0.76 |
||
Analysis of regional and urban heterogeneity
| Variable | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| East | Middle | West | Lower city | High grade city | |
| Policy | 0.0062* | 0.002 | 0.0209*** | 0.0072*** | 0.0014 |
| [0.0031] | [0.0022] | [0.0047] | [0.0013] | [0.0056] | |
| GDP | -0.0247*** | 0.0608*** | 0.0626*** | -0.0035 | -0.018 |
| [0.008] | [0.0198] | [0.0228] | [0.0088] | [0.0105] | |
| Foreign | -0.2105*** | -0.0664*** | 0.0256 | -0.0719*** | -0.2013*** |
| [0.0234] | [0.0178] | [0.0297] | [0.0124] | [0.0557] | |
| In-export | -0.1115*** | -0.0995*** | -0.0937*** | -0.0973*** | -0.1125*** |
| [0.0061] | [0.0052] | [0.0068] | [0.0029] | [0.0144] | |
| Threetwo | -0.0307 | -0.188*** | -0.0968*** | -0.0855*** | -0.2502* |
| [0.0427] | [0.0273] | [0.0334] | [0.0175] | [0.1363] | |
| Income | -0.0014 | -0.2694*** | 0.0668 | -0.0341 | 0.2685*** |
| [0.0459] | [0.0819] | [0.2033] | [0.0399] | [0.0914] | |
| Tech | -0.0465*** | -0.0043* | -0.0035 | -0.0142*** | -0.0155* |
| [0.0046] | [0.0029] | [0.0085] | [0.0026] | [0.0086] | |
| Time fixed effect | control | control | control | control | control |
| Urban fixation effect | control | control | control | control | control |
| _cons | 0.9406 | 0.8285 | 0.8074 | 0.8461 | 0.8598 |
| 0.014 | 0.0097 | 0.0165 | 0.0064 | 0.0345 | |
| Sample size | 1477 | 1452 | 600 | 3256 | 413 |
| R-squared | 0.4628 | 0.4014 | 0.3921 | 0.392 | 0.6234 |
| F value | 69.3573 | 47.1241 | 20.131 | 101.2152 | 32.6532 |
PSM-DIDreturned results
| VARIABLES | (1) | (2) |
|---|---|---|
| Gdp_rate | Gdp_rate | |
| DID | The regression results of the full sample covariable match | The regression results of the full sample covariable match |
| 0.337 |
0.596 |
|
| (0.225) | (0.178) | |
| Control variable | control | control |
| Openness | control | control |
| Employment level | control | control |
| Constant | -35.76 |
-28.68 |
| (10.24) | (6.745) | |
| Observations | 1,685 | 3,379 |
| R-squared | 0.643 | 0.638 |
Model index variable
| Variable name | Variable meaning |
|---|---|
| Policy | National macro policy |
| Time15 | The development of Lanzhou development stage "one five" period |
| Time2010 | Lanzhou key project construction time node |
| GDP | Economic growth level |
| K | Capital stock |
| Foreign | Openness level (investment degree of foreign companies) |
| Communication | Communication level |
| Tech | Technical level |
| Human | Population level |
| In-export | Foreign trade |
| Graduate | Education level |
| Threetwo | Industrial structure |
| Income | Disposable income |
| Jobhuman | Employment level |
Balance test results
| Sample | Ps R2 | LR chi2 | p>chi2 | MeanBias | MedBias | B | R | %Var |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unmatched | 0.051 | 182.24 | 0.000 | 16.5 | 12.8 | 53.4 |
2.08 |
56 |
| Matched | 0.003 | 8.54 | 0.584 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 15.8 | 0.42 | 65 |
Analysis of the heterogeneity of urban development
| Variable | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low construction | High construction | Low population density | Population density | Low economic level | Economic level | |
| Policy | 0.009*** | 0.0029 | 0.0118*** | 0.0039* | 0.0058* | 0.0072*** |
| [0.0027] | [0.0015] | [0.0026] | [0.0017] | [0.0025] | [0.0019] | |
| GDP | -0.0038 | -0.0092 | 0.0388*** | -0.0284*** | 0.0481* | -0.0108 |
| [0.0131] | [0.0067] | [0.0143] | [0.0069] | [0.0251] | [0.0066] | |
| Foreign | -0.084*** | -0.0621*** | -0.071*** | -0.1179*** | -0.0482*** | -0.1449*** |
| [0.019] | [0.0155] | [0.0172] | [0.0179] | [0.0168] | [0.0206] | |
| In-export | -0.0966*** | -0.1018*** | -0.0884*** | -0.1381*** | -0.0985**** | -0.1089*** |
| [0.0043] | [0.0044] | [0.004] | [0.0055] | [0.0039] | [0.0054] | |
| Threetwo | -0.0137 | -0.1234*** | -0.1043*** | -0.0505 | -0.0975*** | -0.0865** |
| [0.0264] | [0.0285] | [0.0218] | [0.0373] | [0.0865] | [0.0424] | |
| Income | -0.0616 | 0.0528 | -0.0274 | 0.0966** | -0.1564** | 0.0865* |
| [0.0575] | [0.044] | [0.0583] | [0.0467] | [0.0865] | [0.0455] | |
| Tech | -0.0424*** | -0.005** | -0.0085*** | -0.0308*** | -0.0865** | -0.0281*** |
| [0.0062] | [0.0013] | [0.0022] | [0.0039] | [0.0865] | [0.0037] | |
| Time fixed effect | control | control | control | control | control | control |
| Urban fixation effect | control | control | control | control | control | control |
| _cons | 0.898*** | 0.7896*** | 0.8477*** | 0.8697*** | 0.8372*** | 0.8796*** |
| [0.0101] | [0.0073] | [0.0078] | [0.0094] | [0.007] | [0.0119] | |
| Sample size | 1789 | 1544 | 1667 | 1854 | 1723 | 1896 |
| R-squared | 0.3729 | 0.5511 | 0.394 | 0.5022 | 0.3976 | 0.4758 |
| F value | 52.1331 | 102.5641 | 55.7751 | 86.653 | 56.7511 | 76.7855 |
Descriptive statistics
| Variable | Observed value | Mean value | Variance | Minimum value | Maximum value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy | 945 | 0.21369 | 0.01614 | 0 | 1 |
| Time15 | 945 | 0.745011 | 0.51594 | 0 | 1 |
| Time2010 | 945 | 0.660534 | 0.54861 | 0 | 1 |
| GDP | 945 | 9946.462 | 14544.647 | 26.08215 | 106731.4 |
| K | 945 | 26211.96 | 41448.571 | 37 | 250054.2 |
| Foreign | 945 | 10419.149 | 19114.61 | 1 | 175432 |
| Communication | 945 | 60256.21 | 38832.133 | 0 | 207999 |
| Tech | 945 | 149.2465 | 498.2587 | 0 | 6316.07 |
| Human | 945 | 3897.441 | 7.41308 | 0.32 | 39.58 |
| In-export | 945 | 4157.134 | 2694.932 | 221 | 12600 |
| Graduate | 945 | 12.68523 | 6.44324 | 2.33473 | 45.54352 |
| Threetwo | 945 | 13.504 | 6.09735 | 3.89038 | 48.0302 |
| Income | 945 | 11.3643 | 5.59307 | 1152 | 52.72563 |
| Jobhuman | 945 | 384.6 | 336.583 | 11.46 | 76436 |
The impact estimation of key project construction in national macro policy
| Variable | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy | -45.576** | -45.142*** | -45.063*** | -45.123*** | -45.032*** | -47.675 |
| (14.767) | (14.656) | (14.555) | (13.489) | (14.232) | (14.365) | |
| GDP | -0.00007 | -0.0000777 | -0.0000745 | -0.000145 | -0.000198 | |
| (0.00032) | (0.00031) | (0.0003212) | (0.000317) | (0.000338) | ||
| Income | -5.767 | -5.045 | 26.231 | 16.343 | ||
| (95.386) | (95.563) | (95.674) | (98.451) | |||
| Communication | 262.214 | -229.563 | -286.132 | |||
| (1248.341) | (1237.021) | (1256.734) | ||||
| Jobhuman | -2.874 | 2.654 | ||||
| (0.756) | (0.724) | |||||
| In-export | 0.0000128** | |||||
| (6.28e-06) | ||||||
| Constant term | 223.032*** | 224.545*** | 229.081*** | 228.653*** | 78.675 | 84.232 |
| (6.423) | (10.154) | (35.245) | (36.045) | (52.654) | (52.572) | |
| Control variable | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Urban fixation effect | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Time fixed effect | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| R2 | 0.267 | 0.267 | 0.268 | 0.270 | 0.279 | 0.284 |
