Distribution network monitoring and management system based on intelligent recognition and judgement
, , , und
27. Dez. 2021
Über diesen Artikel
Online veröffentlicht: 27. Dez. 2021
Seitenbereich: 685 - 694
Eingereicht: 16. Juni 2021
Akzeptiert: 24. Sept. 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2021.1.00057
Schlüsselwörter
© 2021 Xue et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Comparison of active power loss of different optimisation algorithms
| Optimisation | Total active power loss, pu | Number of energy-saving equipment invested |
|---|---|---|
| 0.138 | 5 | |
| 0.135 | 3 |
Comparison results of different optimisation algorithms
| Compare items | PSO | GA-MAS |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum generator active power, pu | 1.998 | 1.972 |
| Minimum generator active power, pu | 0.462 | 0.458 |
| Maximum generator reactive power, pu | 0.245 | 0.102 |
| Minimum generator reactive power, pu | 0.031 | 0.025 |
| Maximum voltage distortion rate THDu, % | 4.02 | 3.63 |
| Minimum voltage distortion rate THDu, % | 2.97 | 2.89 |
| Maximum node voltage, pu | 1.085 | 1.05 |
| Minimum node voltage, pu | 0.989 | 0.952 |
