Exploring the path of high-quality development of the tourism industry in the context of smart tourism
, und
23. Sept. 2025
Über diesen Artikel
Online veröffentlicht: 23. Sept. 2025
Eingereicht: 21. Jan. 2025
Akzeptiert: 10. Mai 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0967
Schlüsselwörter
© 2025 Jianfei Xing et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The development level measure system of the high quality of the wentravel industry
Primary indicator | Secondary indicator | Tertiary index |
---|---|---|
Supply level | venter | Number of travel agents; The number of star hotels; A number of scenic spots; The number of casinos |
Public service | The number of art performers; Number of public libraries; The number of cultural pavilions; Museums; Number of public toilets; National key cultural relics protection unit | |
Innovative ability | Market innovation | The number of innovation in the project; Number of smart spots |
Innovative environment | Human input | |
Technology investment; The number of enterprises and technology centers at or above provincial level and the number of practical innovation enterprises; Patent number | ||
Capital input | ||
Structural coordination | Urban and rural structure | The per capita disposable income of urban residents; The per capita disposable income of rural residents; Consumption expenditure per capita of urban residents; Rural residents per capita consumption expenditure |
Regional structure | The total number of tourists; Travel revenue | |
Green ecology | Ecological quality | Water quality; Air quality; Forest coverage; Green coverage product; Yellow River wetland area |
Number of ecological spots | The number of nature reserves; Number of forest parks | |
Openness | Bring in | Number of inbound visitors; Travel foreign exchange income; Practical use of foreign capital; The number of communication activities of the host country |
Get out | The number of exchanges activities in the participating countries |
Indicators of the development of high quality of tourism
Influencing Factor | Index Selection | Unit | Variable |
---|---|---|---|
Technology Level | Internal Expenses Of R&D Funds | Yuan | |
Government Support | Cultural And Tourism Fees | Yuan | |
Regional Economic Level | Regional GDP | Hundred Dollars | |
Openness | Actual Foreign Investment | Dollars | |
Consumption Level | Per Capita Disposable Income | Yuan | |
Communication Level | Postal Capacity | Hundred Dollars |
Correlation coefficient and VIF value
Correlation coefficient | Q | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q | 1 | ||||||
0.404 | 1 | ||||||
0.304 | 0.155 | 1 | |||||
0.573 | 0.137 | 0.301 | 1 | ||||
0.014 | 0.082 | 0.058 | 0.311 | 1 | |||
0.335 | 0.178 | 0.299 | 0.056 | 0.13 | 1 | ||
0.404 | 0.155 | 0.301 | 0.295 | 0.596 | 0.029 | 1 | |
VIF | 8.668 | 6.306 | 7.255 | 5.621 | 5.654 | 7.488 | 6.828 |
Descriptive statistical analysis of variables
Variable | Mean | Standard Deviation | Aberration |
---|---|---|---|
ln |
14.652 | 1.328 | 6.093 |
ln |
12.036 | 0.655 | 3.735 |
ln |
9.691 | 0.888 | 4.545 |
ln |
3.678 | 1.655 | 9.101 |
ln |
9.879 | 0.435 | 2.265 |
ln |
6.625 | 1.043 | 5.827 |
0.226 | 0.129 | 0.527 |
The development level of the industry is the result of the horizontal measure
County (city) | Primary indicator | Comprehensive score | Ranking | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Innovative development | Coordinated development | Green development | Open development | Shared development | |||
a | 0.9659 | 0.8658 | 0.9054 | 0.8717 | 0.9987 | 0.9003 | 1 |
b | 0.8692 | 0.8881 | 0.8926 | 0.8811 | 0.689 | 0.8786 | 2 |
c | 0.8361 | 0.757 | 0.8279 | 0.8822 | 0.854 | 0.8284 | 3 |
d | 0.8659 | 0.7594 | 0.6796 | 0.8623 | 0.8711 | 0.7937 | 4 |
e | 0.7011 | 0.8871 | 0.6753 | 0.8412 | 0.7796 | 0.7793 | 5 |
f | 0.6643 | 0.5387 | 0.3609 | 0.7442 | 0.7234 | 0.5789 | 6 |
g | 0.536 | 0.6269 | 0.5845 | 0.537 | 0.4758 | 0.5696 | 7 |
h | 0.4177 | 0.5564 | 0.5762 | 0.5734 | 0.8106 | 0.5386 | 8 |
i | 0.5767 | 0.4738 | 0.4745 | 0.5923 | 0.7274 | 0.5228 | 9 |
j | 0.3651 | 0.5329 | 0.5249 | 0.4365 | 0.4622 | 0.4572 | 10 |
k | 0.483 | 0.409 | 0.4159 | 0.5226 | 0.325 | 0.463 | 11 |
l | 0.4602 | 0.4007 | 0.4603 | 0.4688 | 0.48 | 0.4462 | 12 |
m | 0.2672 | 0.2223 | 0.2695 | 0.3493 | 0.4797 | 0.2708 | 13 |
n | 0.1656 | 0.1695 | 0.2525 | 0.2415 | 0.199 | 0.2014 | 14 |
Moran’s I test results
Year | Moran’s I | Z | P |
---|---|---|---|
2009 | 0.161 | 2.651 | 0.003 |
2010 | 0.15 | 2.452 | 0.008 |
2011 | 0.191 | 2.838 | 0.002 |
2012 | 0.186 | 2.87 | 0.003 |
2013 | 0.234 | 3.307 | 0 |
2014 | 0.191 | 2.811 | 0.002 |
2015 | 0.185 | 2.843 | 0.002 |
2016 | 0.195 | 2.897 | 0.001 |
2017 | 0.185 | 2.858 | 0.011 |
2018 | 0.178 | 2.737 | 0.006 |
2019 | 0.139 | 2.322 | 0.016 |
2020 | 0.103 | 1.979 | 0.031 |
2021 | 0.072 | 1.687 | 0.052 |
2022 | 0.11 | 2.02 | 0.025 |
2023 | 0.114 | 1.94 | 0.026 |
Unit root test results
variable | LLC test | Fisher-ADF test | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Statistic | p-vlaue | Statistic | p-vlaue | |
Q | -6.1418 | 0.000*** | 40.5855 | 0.000*** |
-5.5624 | 0.000*** | 85.0985 | 0.000*** | |
-5.0835 | 0.000*** | 33.8155 | 0.000*** | |
-4.3033 | 0.000*** | 58.4175 | 0.000*** | |
-13.8104 | 0.000*** | 61.5195 | 0.000*** | |
-16.2047 | 0.000*** | 145.4366 | 0.000*** | |
-17.2311 | 0.000*** | 146.5213 | 0.000*** |
Robustness test
variable | whole | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FE | FE | FE | FE | Time series regression | |
lnq | lnq | lnq | lnq | lnq | |
0.2242 | 0.1436 | 0.3506 | 0.148 | 0.582 | |
(0.013) | (0.381) | (0.04) | (1.203) | (0.459) | |
0.1936 | 0.172 | 0.0063 | 0.087 | 0.214 | |
(0.018) | (0.292) | (0.033) | (0.645) | (0.583) | |
0.1577 | 0.088 | 0.0233 | 0.42 | 0.6752 | |
(0.079) | (0.128) | (0.044) | (1.736) | (0.2935) | |
0.0242 | 0.041 | 0.0123 | 0.067 | 0.7936 | |
(0.019) | (0.038) | (0.079) | (1.207) | (0.168) | |
0.3071 | 0.2961 | 0.3653 | 0.745 | 0.1658 | |
(0.07) | (0.046) | (0.021) | (0.969) | (0.44) | |
0.2282 | 0.1446 | 0.3596 | 0.152 | 0.585 | |
(0.018) | (0.374) | (0.039) | (1.192) | (0.461) | |
_cons | -0.505 | -0.536 | -0.2622 | -0.426 | -0.278 |
(0.092) | (0.024) | (0.071) | (-0.338) | (-0.535) | |
N | 151 | 38 | 55 | 34 | 11 |
r2 | 0.8569 | 0.4312 | 0.5521 | 0.6871 | 0.7215 |
The index system weight of the development evaluation index of cultural industry
System layer | System layer weight | Index layer | Index weight |
---|---|---|---|
Innovative development | 0.1755 | Number of patent authorization for cultural industry(x1) | 0.0659 |
The number of academic papers in the cultural industry(x2) | 0.0603 | ||
Number of national and provincial cultural industry demonstration garden (base) (x3) | 0.0493 | ||
Coordinated development | 0.1751 | The above scale culture service sector revenue ratio(x4) | 0.0784 |
The ratio of the consumption expenditure per capita of urban and rural residents per capita(x5) | 0.0161 | ||
Personal expenditure per capita(x6) | 0.0443 | ||
Cultural and media spending is the general public budget expenditure ratio(x7) | 0.0363 | ||
Green development | 0.2745 | The total amount of cultural enterprise assets above is (x8) | 0.088 |
Above scale cultural enterprise capital productivity (x9) | 0.0426 | ||
Above scale cultural enterprise labor productivity (x10) | 0.0531 | ||
National and provincial intangible cultural heritage (x11) | 0.0417 | ||
Number of national and provincial cultural relics protection units (x12) | 0.0491 | ||
Open development | 0.1748 | International travel exchange income (x13) | 0.088 |
Culture and tourism (x14) | 0.0544 | ||
Culture and technology (x15) | 0.0324 | ||
Shared development | 0.2001 | Urban residents per capita cultural and entertainment spending (x16) | 0.0275 |
Rural residents per capita cultural and entertainment spending (x17) | 0.0299 | ||
The average average public library is the amount of books (x18) | 0.0423 | ||
Every 10,000 people have museums, cultural pavilions, and library Numbers (x19) | 0.0359 | ||
The number of art performers per 10,000 people (x20) | 0.0645 |
The partition domain returns
variable | whole | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FE | FE | FE | FE | Time series regression | |
lnq | lnq | lnq | lnq | lnq | |
ln |
0.0783** | 0.185** | 0.0951** | 0.422** | 0.1736** |
(0.068) | (0.16) | (0.042) | (1.79) | (0.2869) | |
ln |
0.0325** | 0.2511 | 0.0831** | 0.068** | 0.1187** |
(0.035) | (0.045) | (0.085) | (0.221) | (0.087) | |
ln |
0.0662*** | 0.1286 | 0.3376** | 0.1496** | 0.2748 |
(0.018) | (0.393) | (0.03) | (1.204) | (0.309) | |
ln |
0.0537*** | 0.1295** | 0.1163** | 0.149** | 0.387** |
(0.025) | (0.294) | (0.089) | (1.362) | (0.2291) | |
ln |
0.0583** | 0.099** | 0.267 | 0.3365 | 0.3845 |
(0.095) | (0.029) | (0.028) | (1.028) | (0.124) | |
In |
0.0517*** | 0.1145*** | 0.1163*** | 0.153*** | 0.377*** |
(0.015) | (0.297) | (0.084) | (1.365) | (0.2381) | |
_cons | -0 46*** | -0.343*** | -0.6176*** | -0.128*** | -0.474*** |
0.107 | 0.047 | 0.039 | -0.458 | -0.298 | |
N | 151 | 38 | 55 | 34 | 11 |
r2 | 0.371 | 0.8155 | 0.4788 | 0.5911 | 0.7305 |