Research on the Impact of Supply Chain ESG on Enterprises’ Green Innovation Performance
und
21. März 2025
Über diesen Artikel
Online veröffentlicht: 21. März 2025
Eingereicht: 30. Okt. 2024
Akzeptiert: 10. Feb. 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0610
Schlüsselwörter
© 2025 Ze Ming et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

The result of regression analysis
| (1)High environmental sensitivity industry | (2)Low environmental sensitivity industry | |
|---|---|---|
| ESG | 0.287*** | 0.144 |
| (0.084) | (0.128) | |
| Controls | YES | YES |
| _cons | -11.568*** | -6.769*** |
| (0.978) | (0.921) | |
| N | 12333 | 6354 |
| R2_a | 0.132 | 0.088 |
| Industry | YES | YES |
| Year | YES | YES |
Analysis of property rights heterogeneity
| (1)Non-state enterprise | (2)State enterprise | |
|---|---|---|
| ESG | 0.353*** | 0.221** |
| (0.084) | (0.077) | |
| Controls | YES | YES |
| _cons | -7.239*** | -8.438*** |
| (0.597) | (0.587) | |
| N | 10464 | 8223 |
| R2_a | 0.445 | 0.468 |
| Industry | YES | YES |
| Year | YES | YES |
Variable definition
| Variable category | Variable name | Variable symbol | Definition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Explained variable | Green innovation performance | Green_IP | Number of green patent applications |
| Interpretation variable | ESG performance | ESG | ESG comprehensive score |
| Regulating variable | Enterprise control | CL | Internal controlling scoring |
| Control variable | Leverage | Lev | Total liabilities/all assets |
| Cash holdings | Cashhld | Sum of cash/total assets | |
| Tobin’s Q | Tobinq | The company’s market price/asset replacement cost | |
| Independent ratio | Idr | The number of independent directors/the total number of directors | |
| Equity concentration | Ec | The proportion of the largest shareholders in the listed company | |
| Enterprise size | Size | Ln(total assets+1) | |
| Enterprise age | Age | Established life | |
| Dual role combination | Duality | If assigned as chairman and general manager=1, otherwise=0 | |
| Enterprise year | Year | Year virtual variable | |
| Industry | Ind | Industry virtual variables |
The selection of green innovation performance evaluation index
| The evaluation indicator system of enterprise green innovation performance | Primary indicator | Secondary indicator |
| Profitability | Total net profit ratio | |
| Net asset yield | ||
| Operating margin | ||
| Business net profit rate | ||
| Investment yield | ||
| Earning per share | ||
| Operational and growth capacity | Total asset growth rate | |
| Net profit growth rate | ||
| revenue growth | ||
| Net asset growth rate per share | ||
| Inventory turnover rate | ||
| Accounts receivable turnover days | ||
| Technical innovation ability | R&D personnel number | |
| R&D personnel ratio | ||
| R&D cost | ||
| R&D investment ratio | ||
| Intangible assets | ||
| Intangible assets ratio | ||
| ESG social responsibility | Comprehensive ESG score | |
| E scores | ||
| S scores | ||
| G scores | ||
| The number of green patents cited |
Benchmark regression and robustness test results
| Variable | Full sample | Large enterprise | Small enterprise | Robustness test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESG | 0.421*** | 0.409*** | 0.311*** | 0.413*** |
| (0.052) | (0.03) | (0.063) | 0.054 | |
| Lev | 0.492* | 0.569* | 0.455* | 0.493* |
| (0.292) | (0.302) | (0.296) | 0.287 | |
| Cashhld | 2.65*** | 2.637*** | 2.625*** | 2.648*** |
| (0.481) | (0.472) | (0.568) | 0.485 | |
| Tobinq | 0.198*** | 0.208*** | 0.21*** | 0.198*** |
| (0.025) | (0.044) | (0.103) | 0.028 | |
| Idr | 0.529 | 0.472 | 0.449 | 0.525 |
| (0.723) | (0.729) | (0.774) | 0.723 | |
| Ec | -0.015*** | -0.017*** | 0.020*** | -0.016*** |
| (0.005) | (0.009) | (0.042) | 0.002 | |
| Size | 1.728*** | 1.715*** | 1.574*** | 1.735*** |
| (0.051) | (0.04) | (0.094) | 0.053 | |
| Age | -0.048*** | -0.053*** | -0.028*** | -0.056*** |
| (0.015) | (0.011) | (0.083) | 0.012 | |
| Duality | 0.177 | 0.196 | 0.293 | 0.183 |
| (0.112) | (0.11) | (0.129) | 0.109 | |
| CL | 0.318** | 0.11*** | 0.090*** | 0.308** |
| (0.033) | (3.637) | (3.583) | (0.035) | |
| CL*ESG | 0.372*** | -0.05*** | -0.054*** | 0.368*** |
| (0.013) | (0.003) | (0.014) | (0.022) | |
| _cons | -39.105*** | -8.785*** | -38.84*** | -39.101*** |
| (1.14) | (3.137) | (4.201) | 1.14 | |
| Ind | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Year | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| N | 18687 | 9323 | 9364 | 15681 |
Analysis of regional heterogeneity
| East | Middle | West | Northeast | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESG | 0.354*** | 0.032 | 0.383 | -1.223* |
| (0.113) | (0.135) | (0.232) | (0.141) | |
| Controls | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| _cons | -8.138*** | -9.578*** | -13.871*** | -11.697** |
| (0.997) | (1.738) | (1.768) | (4.428) | |
| N | 7475 | 3737 | 5606 | 1869 |
| R2 | 0.126 | 0.114 | 0.138 | 0.187 |
| Industry | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Year | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Endogenous test results
| Variable | First stage | Second stage |
|---|---|---|
| ESG_mean→ESG | 0.489***(0.031) | |
| ESG→Green_IP | 1.745***(0.431) | |
| F test of IV | 324.82*** | |
| Under identification test | 315.387*** | |
| Weak identification test | 438.687[17.391] | |
| Observations | 18687 | 18687 |
Descriptive statistics of variables
| Variable | Sample | Mean | Sd. | Min | Median | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green_IP | 18687 | 2.154 | 6.842 | 0 | 0 | 47 |
| ESG | 18687 | 6.579 | 1.202 | 5 | 3.5 | 9 |
| Lev | 18687 | 0.449 | 0.179 | 0.460 | 0.043 | 0.895 |
| Cashhld | 18687 | 0.141 | 0.099 | 0.103 | 0.016 | 0.596 |
| Tobinq | 18687 | 2.089 | 1.372 | 1.655 | 0.875 | 8.920 |
| Idr | 18687 | 0.356 | 0.091 | 0.361 | 0.268 | 0.581 |
| Ec | 18687 | 33.671 | 14.778 | 31.319 | 8.716 | 74.194 |
| Size | 18687 | 22.487 | 1.298 | 22.311 | 19.876 | 26.285 |
| Age | 18687 | 19.006 | 6.862 | 20 | 6 | 32 |
| Duality | 18687 | 0.233 | 0.423 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
