Research on Network Resources Integration of University English Blended Learning Model Based on Multi-Objective Optimization

[1] Yang, C. (2018). Research on the mixed teaching mode of TPACK in software testing course. Recent Patents on Computer Science, 11(4), 302-311. YangC. (2018). Research on the mixed teaching mode of TPACK in software testing course. Recent Patents on Computer Science, 11(4), 302-311.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Zheng, Y. (2023). The Application of the New Era Mixed Teaching Mode in the Practical Teaching of Ideological and Political Courses in Colleges and Universities. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology, 6(13), 1-6. ZhengY. (2023). The Application of the New Era Mixed Teaching Mode in the Practical Teaching of Ideological and Political Courses in Colleges and Universities. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology, 6(13), 1-6.Search in Google Scholar

[3] He, F. (2020, April). Application research of mixed teaching mode based on Wechat applet. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1486, No. 3, p. 032006). IOP Publishing. HeF. (2020, April). Application research of mixed teaching mode based on Wechat applet. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1486, No. 3, p. 032006). IOP Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Fresen, J. W. (2020). Embracing distance education in a blended learning model: Challenges and prospects. Exploring Dual and Mixed Mode Provision of Distance Education, 108-124. FresenJ. W. (2020). Embracing distance education in a blended learning model: Challenges and prospects. Exploring Dual and Mixed Mode Provision of Distance Education, 108-124.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Park, H., & Shea, P. (2020). A Review of Ten-Year Research through Co-citation Analysis: Online Learning, Distance Learning, and Blended Learning. Online Learning, 24(2), 225-244. ParkH. & SheaP. (2020). A Review of Ten-Year Research through Co-citation Analysis: Online Learning, Distance Learning, and Blended Learning. Online Learning, 24(2), 225-244.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Luo, R., Wang, J., & Wang, Y. (2023). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of using videoconferencing for EFL learning: Evidence from Tencent Meeting application. Heliyon, 9(12). LuoR.WangJ. & WangY. (2023). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of using videoconferencing for EFL learning: Evidence from Tencent Meeting application. Heliyon, 9(12).Search in Google Scholar

[7] Hockly, N. (2018). Blended learning. Elt Journal, 72(1), 97-101. HocklyN. (2018). Blended learning. Elt Journal, 72(1), 97-101.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Dakhi, O., JAMA, J., & IRFAN, D. (2020). Blended learning: a 21st century learning model at college. International Journal Of Multi Science, 1(08), 50-65. DakhiO.JAMAJ. & IRFAND. (2020). Blended learning: a 21st century learning model at college. International Journal Of Multi Science, 1(08), 50-65.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Sari, I. K. (2021). Blended learning sebagai alternatif model pembelajaran inovatif di masa post-pandemi di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(4), 2156-2163. SariI. K. (2021). Blended learning sebagai alternatif model pembelajaran inovatif di masa post-pandemi di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(4), 2156-2163.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Wright, B. M. (2017). Blended learning: Student perception of face-to-face and online EFL lessons. Indonesian journal of applied linguistics, 7(1). WrightB. M. (2017). Blended learning: Student perception of face-to-face and online EFL lessons. Indonesian journal of applied linguistics, 7(1).Search in Google Scholar

[11] Albiladi, W. S., & Alshareef, K. K. (2019). Blended learning in English teaching and learning: A review of the current literature. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(2), 232-238. AlbiladiW. S. & AlshareefK. K. (2019). Blended learning in English teaching and learning: A review of the current literature. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(2), 232-238.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Meng, X., Niu, D., Ding, L., & Wang, L. (2024). Research on the effect of mixed teaching strategies on students’ ambidextrous innovation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, 101390. MengX.NiuD.DingL. & WangL. (2024). Research on the effect of mixed teaching strategies on students’ ambidextrous innovation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, 101390.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Rafiola, R., Setyosari, P., Radjah, C., & Ramli, M. (2020). The effect of learning motivation, self-efficacy, and blended learning on students’ achievement in the industrial revolution 4.0. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(8), 71-82. RafiolaR.SetyosariP.RadjahC. & RamliM. (2020). The effect of learning motivation, self-efficacy, and blended learning on students’ achievement in the industrial revolution 4.0. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(8), 71-82.Search in Google Scholar

[14] AlKhaleel, A. (2019). The advantages of using blended learning in studying English as a foreign language at the University of Tabuk. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods (MJLTM), 9(2), 1-7. AlKhaleelA. (2019). The advantages of using blended learning in studying English as a foreign language at the University of Tabuk. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods (MJLTM), 9(2), 1-7.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Nincarean A/L Eh Phon, D., Abdullah, A., ... & Baba, S. (2019). Exploring the role of blended learning for teaching and learning effectiveness in institutions of higher learning: An empirical investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 3433-3466. AnthonyB.KamaludinA.RomliA.RaffeiA. F. M.Nincarean A/L Eh PhonD.AbdullahA., ... & BabaS. (2019). Exploring the role of blended learning for teaching and learning effectiveness in institutions of higher learning: An empirical investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 3433-3466.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Xu, Y., Gui, G., Gacanin, H., & Adachi, F. (2021). A survey on resource allocation for 5G heterogeneous networks: Current research, future trends, and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 23(2), 668-695. XuY.GuiG.GacaninH. & AdachiF. (2021). A survey on resource allocation for 5G heterogeneous networks: Current research, future trends, and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 23(2), 668-695.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Chen, T., Ling, Q., & Giannakis, G. B. (2017). An online convex optimization approach to proactive network resource allocation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 65(24), 6350-6364. ChenT.LingQ. & GiannakisG. B. (2017). An online convex optimization approach to proactive network resource allocation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 65(24), 6350-6364.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Sharma, S., & Kumar, V. (2022). A comprehensive review on multi-objective optimization techniques: Past, present and future. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 29(7), 5605-5633. SharmaS. & KumarV. (2022). A comprehensive review on multi-objective optimization techniques: Past, present and future. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 29(7), 5605-5633.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Sener, O., & Koltun, V. (2018). Multi-task learning as multi-objective optimization. Advances in neural information processing systems, 31. SenerO. & KoltunV. (2018). Multi-task learning as multi-objective optimization. Advances in neural information processing systems, 31.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Pereira, J. L. J., Oliver, G. A., Francisco, M. B., Cunha Jr, S. S., & Gomes, G. F. (2022). A review of multi-objective optimization: methods and algorithms in mechanical engineering problems. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 29(4), 2285-2308. PereiraJ. L. J.OliverG. A.FranciscoM. B.Cunha JrS. S. & GomesG. F. (2022). A review of multi-objective optimization: methods and algorithms in mechanical engineering problems. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 29(4), 2285-2308.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Gunantara, N. (2018). A review of multi-objective optimization: Methods and its applications. Cogent Engineering, 5(1), 1502242. GunantaraN. (2018). A review of multi-objective optimization: Methods and its applications. Cogent Engineering, 5(1), 1502242.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Devendra Pendokhare & Shankar Chakraborty. (2024). A Review on Multi-objective Optimization Techniques of Wire Electrical Discharge Machining. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering (prepublish),1-43. PendokhareDevendra & ChakrabortyShankar. (2024). A Review on Multi-objective Optimization Techniques of Wire Electrical Discharge Machining. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering (prepublish),1-43.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Mohsen Shojaee,Siamak Noori,Samrad Jafarian Namin,Arne Johannssen & Hasan Rasay. (2024). Assessing the economic-statistical performance of an attribute SVSSI-np control chart based on genetic algorithms. Computers & Industrial Engineering110401-110401. ShojaeeMohsenNooriSiamakNaminSamrad JafarianJohannssenArne & RasayHasan. (2024). Assessing the economic-statistical performance of an attribute SVSSI-np control chart based on genetic algorithms. Computers & Industrial Engineering110401-110401.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Pramod Pandurang Jadhav,Sandeep Dwarkanath Pande,Rahul Joshi,Sudhanshu Gonge,Maya P. Shelke,Pravin Futane & S. K. Hasane Ahammad. (2024). CSADF: ingesting cuckoo search optimization algorithm enabled with fitness function for effective model transformation pertaining to ADF. Multimedia Tools and Applications(33),79219-79234. JadhavPramod PandurangPandeSandeep DwarkanathJoshiRahulGongeSudhanshuShelkeMaya P.FutanePravin & AhammadS. K. Hasane. (2024). CSADF: ingesting cuckoo search optimization algorithm enabled with fitness function for effective model transformation pertaining to ADF. Multimedia Tools and Applications(33),79219-79234.Search in Google Scholar