This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reiling, A. D. (2020). Courts and artificial intelligence. In IJCA (Vol. 11, p. 1).Search in Google Scholar
Mokhtarian, E. (2018). The bot legal code: developing a legally compliant artificial intelligence. Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L., 21, 145.Search in Google Scholar
Ashley, K. D. (2017). Artificial intelligence and legal analytics: new tools for law practice in the digital age. Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Walters, E. (2018). The Model Rules of Autonomous Conduct: Ethical Responsibilities of Lawyers and Artificial Intelligence. Ga. St. UL Rev., 35, 1073.Search in Google Scholar
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., & Bollegala, D. (2020). Explanation in AI and law: Past, present and future. Artificial Intelligence, 289, 103387.Search in Google Scholar
Kluttz, D. N., & Mulligan, D. K. (2019). Automated decision support technologies and the legal profession. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 34(3), 853-890.Search in Google Scholar
Araujo, T., Helberger, N., Kruikemeier, S., & De Vreese, C. H. (2020). In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence. AI & society, 35(3), 611-623.Search in Google Scholar
Han, W., Shen, J., Liu, Y., Shi, Z., Xu, J., Hu, F., ... & Ge, M. (2024). : Human-Centered and AI-Empowered Machine to Enhance Court Productivity and Legal Assistance. Information Sciences, 121052.Search in Google Scholar
Sourdin, T. (2018). Judge v Robot?: Artificial intelligence and judicial decision-making. University of New South Wales Law Journal, The, 41(4), 1114-1133.Search in Google Scholar
Coglianese, C., & Dor, L. M. B. (2020). AI in Adjudication and Administration. Brook. L. Rev., 86, 791.Search in Google Scholar
Doshi-Velez, F., Kortz, M., Budish, R., Bavitz, C., Gershman, S., O’Brien, D., ... & Wood, A. (2007). Accountability of AI Under the Law: The Role of Explanation. DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE, 663, 663-65.Search in Google Scholar
Bonicalzi, S. (2022). A matter of justice. The opacity of algorithmic decision-making and the trade-off between uniformity and discretion in legal applications of artificial intelligence. Teoria. Rivista di filosofia, 42(2), 131-147.Search in Google Scholar
Cobbe, J. (2019). Administrative law and the machines of government: judicial review of automated public-sector decision-making. Legal Studies, 39(4), 636-655.Search in Google Scholar
Bhatt, H., Bahuguna, R., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., Akram, S. V., Priyadarshi, N., & Twala, B. (2022). Artificial intelligence and robotics led technological tremors: a seismic shift towards digitizing the legal ecosystem. Applied Sciences, 12(22), 11687.Search in Google Scholar
Zhenyu Wang,Jian Zhou,Kun Du & Manoj Khandelwal. (2024). Enhanced multi-task learning models for pile drivability prediction: Leveraging metaheuristic algorithms and statistical evaluation. Transportation Geotechnics101288-.Search in Google Scholar
Jiawen He,Bin Zhang,Peishun Liu,Xiaolei Li,Liang Wang & Ruichun Tang. (2024). Effective underwater acoustic target passive localization of using a multi-task learning model with attention mechanism: Analysis and comparison under real sea trial datasets. Applied Ocean Research104072-.Search in Google Scholar
Xiaoqi Zhou,Brian Sheil,Stephen Suryasentana & Peixin Shi. (2024). Multi-fidelity fusion for soil classification via LSTM and multi-head self-attention CNN model. Advanced Engineering Informatics(PA), 102655-102655.Search in Google Scholar
Makarakreasey King,Sang Inn Woo & Chan Young Yune. (2024). Utilizing a CNN-RNN machine learning approach for forecasting time-series outlet fluid temperature monitoring by long-term operation of BHEs system. Geothermics103082-103082.Search in Google Scholar
