Application of automation technology in power system protection and control
, and
Sep 29, 2025
About this article
Published Online: Sep 29, 2025
Received: Jan 26, 2025
Accepted: May 10, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-1131
Keywords
© 2025 Lirong Xiao, Fugen Shu and Taiping Wu, published by Sciendo.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

Training results under different parameters
| No. | First filter size | N | Second filter size | Nr | Number of iterations | Training set error rate | Verify the set error rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10×10 | 12 | 10×10 | 32 | 60 | 0.5381% | 0.5793% |
| 2 | 10×10 | 20 | 10×10 | 32 | 60 | 0.4877% | 0.5595% |
| 3 | 10×10 | 12 | 10×10 | 20 | 60 | 0.6762% | 0.8187% |
| 4 | 10×10 | 12 | 10×10 | 32 | 40 | 0.5391% | 0.6679% |
| 5 | 10×10 | 12 | 10×10 | 32 | 10 | 5.0672% | 9.4767% |
| 6 | 6×6 | 12 | 10×10 | 32 | 60 | 0.4993% | 0.5282% |
| 7 | 18×18 | 12 | 10×10 | 32 | 40 | 0.5988% | 0.6996% |
| 8 | 10×10 | 12 | 6×6 | 20 | 40 | 0.6796% | 0.7791% |
| 9 | 6×6 | 20 | 10×10 | 32 | 40 | 0.4789% | 0.4992% |
Power system voltage waveform data
| Type | Before optimization | Post-optimization | Difference value | Rate of change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum value /KV | 36.17 | 34.39 | 1.78 | 4.92% |
| Minimum value /KV | -35.04 | -34.84 | 0.2 | 0.57% |
| Valid value /KV | 22.35 | 24.39 | 2.04 | 9.13% |
Test result
| Category | NF | 1PG | 1NG | 1PN | 2PG | 2NG | 2PN | 3PG | 3NG | 3PN | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NF | 6000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.00% |
| 1PG | 4 | 5924 | 21 | 4 | 15 | 8 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 98.73% |
| 1NG | 0 | 7 | 5946 | 6 | 7 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 9 | 2 | 99.10% |
| 1PN | 4 | 6 | 2 | 5967 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 99.45% |
| 2PG | 6 | 7 | 4 | 10 | 5951 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 6 | 99.18% |
| 2NG | 10 | 9 | 4 | 10 | 1 | 5957 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 99.28% |
| 2PN | 4 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 2 | 5937 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 98.95% |
| 3PG | 9 | 4 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 5951 | 6 | 1 | 99.18% |
| 3NG | 1 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5976 | 1 | 99.60% |
| 3PN | 6 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 5967 | 99.45% |
| Total | 99.29% | ||||||||||
Output results of different fault types
| Fault type | Output result | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1PG | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1NG | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1PN | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2PG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2NG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2PN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3PG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 3NG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 3PN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Various types of prediction accuracy, recall rate, F1 value
| Category | Accuracy | Recall | F1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| NF | 100.00% | 98.32% | 99.15% |
| 1PG | 98.73% | 96.68% | 97.70% |
| 1NG | 99.10% | 95.05% | 97.03% |
| 1PN | 99.45% | 98.09% | 98.77% |
| 2PG | 99.18% | 99.37% | 99.28% |
| 2NG | 99.28% | 97.02% | 98.14% |
| 2PN | 98.95% | 96.36% | 97.64% |
| 3PG | 99.18% | 98.54% | 98.86% |
| 3NG | 99.60% | 98.37% | 98.98% |
| 3PN | 99.45% | 97.97% | 98.70% |
| Total | 99.29% | 97.53% | 98.39% |
