Open Access

Construction and Practice of Cloud Computing-Based Service Platform for College Career Planning

  
Sep 29, 2025

Cite
Download Cover

Figure 1.

Career planning platform specific requirements
Career planning platform specific requirements

Figure 2.

Data mining process
Data mining process

Figure 3.

System overall framework
System overall framework

Figure 4.

Some high-frequency interest interests user coverage
Some high-frequency interest interests user coverage

Figure 5.

User coverage of some high-frequency professional skills
User coverage of some high-frequency professional skills

Figure 6.

“1+ 3+ 2”career planning mode
“1+ 3+ 2”career planning mode

Figure 7.

Investigation and analysis of occupational identity
Investigation and analysis of occupational identity

The association rules for various classes under different thresholds

Minimum support threshold 0.2% 0.4% 0.6% 0.8% 1.0% 1.2% 1.4% 1.6% 1.8% 2.0%
S2S rule 2406 1479 1078 812 619 474 352 271 203 166
D2S rule 3225 667 241 121 63 30 17 13 12 6
D2D rule 2543 520 338 167 88 45 24 15 11 2

Professional skill word frequency sample

Interest term Frequency Emergence ratio
Management 4437 1.61%
Leadership 3963 1.45%
Strategic planning 3350 1.24%
Project management 3179 1.15%
Strategy 2562 0.97%
Finance 2313 0.86%
Sales 2067 0.77%
Microsoft office 1991 0.76%
Marketing 1914 0.73%
Training 1846 0.73%

The number of association rules under different threshars

Minimum confidence threshold Minimum support threshold
0.2% 0.4% 0.6% 0.8% 1.0% 1.2% 1.4% 1.6% 1.8% 2.0%
10% 11469 4323 2831 1907 1309 885 601 453 330 254
20% 3973 1281 694 505 398 341 274 222 180 143
30% 1748 557 302 199 143 120 114 101 89 72
40% 710 196 101 56 39 32 24 27 25 22
50% 220 61 24 11 12 9 9 10 4 9
60% 78 21 6 3 3 1 2 4 4 3
70% 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
80% 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
90% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Different learning stages of the students’ professional identity

N Minimum value Maximum value Mean Standard deviation
Occupational awareness 120 1.711 5.000 3.946 0.649
Professional emotion 120 2.010 5.000 4.012 0.645
Professional will 120 2.201 5.000 3.654 0.642
Career expectation 120 1.668 5.000 3.615 0.677
Occupational behavior and disposition 120 1.288 5.000 3.589 0.735
Professional identity 120 1.931 5.000 3.756 0.594

College students’ professional identity and various dimensional analysis

Occupational awareness Professional emotion Professional will Career expectation Occupational behavior and disposition Professional identity
Occupational awareness 1
Professional emotion 0.835** 1
Professional will 0.723** 0.654** 1
Career expectation 0.706** 0.633** 0.618** 1 *
Occupational behavior and disposition 0.678** 0.636** 0.738** 0.639** 1
Professional identity 0.911** 0.858** 0.844** 0.835** 0.877** 1

Given the S2S association rule sample

Front piece Afterpiece Support Confidence Degree of ascension
Building Team building 0.22% 68.43% 432.61%
Basketball Leadership 3.93% 62.94% 184.02%
Baseball Leadership 4.40% 57.84% 169.18%
Rugby Management 0.88% 55.69% 145.35%
Performance Leadership 0.31% 54.77% 160.23%
Communication Strategic planning 0.62% 52.99% 183.02%
Hike Management 0.20% 52.73% 137.66%
Risk Java 0.21% 52.23% 1083.28%
Psychology Management 0.48% 50.94% 133.08%
Fitness Management 2.20% 45.50% 118.83%

The D2D association rule sample is shown in the given threshold

Front piece Afterpiece Support Confidence Degree of ascension
Media communication Public relations social media 0.27% 75.81% 1547.74%
Basketball; writing Management; leadership 0.23% 54.51% 234.51%
Photography; basketball Management; leadership 0.29% 54.12% 232.55%
Basketball; language Coaching; leadership 0.25% 47.47% 553.72%
Technology; baseball Management; leadership 0.40% 45.69% 196.38%
Baseball; language Leadership; workshop facilitation 0.21% 40.00% 1039.13%
Media; movie Public relations; social media 0.17% 39.70% 810.67%
Media; writing Social media; blogging 0.21% 36.47% 1420.93%
Movie; writing Skill-editing; social media 0.16% 31.65% 1240.15%
Travel internet Leadership; strategic planning 0.61% 30.07% 175.82%

Given a threshold value of D2S correlation rule sample

Front piece After piece Support Confidence Degree of ascension
Media communication Social media 0.24% 87.89% 693.04%
Media communication Public relations 0.22% 78.80% 685.33%
Basketball writing Leadership 0.32% 77.26% 225.99%
Baseball fitness Leadership 0.28% 70.45% 206.00%
Photography basketball Management 0.35% 68.86% 179.78%
Media internet Social media 0.56% 68.04% 536.60%
Tennis investment Finance 0.23% 65.05% 325.19%
Read basketball Management 0.51% 55.46% 144.75%
Media internet Strategic planning 0.43% 52.59% 181.63%
Media internet Marketing 0.40% 50.52% 307.88%

Interest in word frequency sample

Interest term Frequency Emergence ratio
Travel 2385 5.73%
Read 1782 4.29%
Music 1409 3.37%
Golf 1255 3.08%
Ski 1211 2.89%
Sport 1114 2.66%
Photography 1110 2.66%
Movie 978 2.34%
Cycling 893 2.15%
Running 848 2.00%

Analysis of differences in working industry identity

Grade Case number Mean value Standard deviation F P
Occupational awareness Freshman year 40 4.147 0.59 5.387 0.007
Sophomore 40 3.97 0.618
Junior 40 3.704 0.676
Professional emotion Freshman year 40 4.274 0.555 7.556 0.001
Sophomore 40 3.956 0.634
Junior 40 3.761 0.638
Professional will Freshman year 40 3.919 0.54 7.551 0.001
Sophomore 40 3.634 0.706
Junior 40 3.398 0.574
Career expectation Freshman year 40 3.95 0.559 10.254 0.000
Sophomore 40 3.555 0.647
Junior 40 3.339 0.678
Occupational behavior and disposition Freshman year 40 3.851 0.637 7.659 0.001
Sophomore 40 3.644 0.731
Junior 40 3.246 0.732
Professional identity Freshman year 40 4.022 0.471 9.939 0.000
Sophomore 40 3.754 0.591
Junior 40 3.484 0.577
Language:
English