Research on multivariate statistical analysis methods of rural economic dynamics in the context of digital countryside
Sep 26, 2025
About this article
Published Online: Sep 26, 2025
Received: Jan 24, 2025
Accepted: May 05, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-1053
Keywords
© 2025 Xuelei Zhang, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Normalized cointeger vector
| lnGDP | lnDI | lnFDI | lnL | C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.00000 | -0.365521 | -0.125112 | -0.092311 | -4.362281 |
| Standard error | 0.04551 | 0.02775 | 0.02932 | |
| Logarithmic likelihood | 165.5226 | |||
The johansen cointegral test results
| Original hypothesis | Maximum characteristic root (p value) | The critical value of a significant level of 1% | Trace statistics (p) | The critical value of a significant level of 1% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zero cointegral vector | 53.29066(0.0000)* | 34.94264 | 107.18813(0.0000)* | 61.64493 |
| At least one cointegral vector | 28.69266(0.0062)* | 26.74797 | 53.47109(0.0003)* | 42.37507 |
| At least two cointegral vector | 15.86719(0.0721) | 20.90672 | 24.66381(0.0105) | 22.8413 |
| At least three cointegral vector | 8.87416(0.0312) | 12.12043 | 8.97686(0.0322) | 13.26284 |
Regression
| Variable | Coefficient | Std.error | T-Statistic | Prob. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | -995.9902 | 277.5201 | -3.631125 | 0.0006 |
| Y(-1) | 0.781522 | 0.062366 | 15.03522 | 0.0000 |
| X1 | 0.195532 | 0.041552 | 4.826638 | 0.0000 |
| X2 | 0.335698 | 0.076552 | 4.189552 | 0.0002 |
| X3 | 0.621852 | 0.226594 | 2.750622 | 0.0079 |
| X5 | 1.720026 | 0.625512 | 2.795512 | 0.0062 |
| X6 | -0.000192 | 5.01E-05 | -3.78445 | 0.0002 |
| AR(1) | 0.335216 | 0.096622 | 3.785123 | 0.0009 |
| R-squared= | 0.998562 | Prob(F-statistic) | =0.000000 | DW=2.005163 |
The analysis of the variance of the natural log of GDP(%)
| Period | S.E. | GDP | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.01464 | 100.0000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
| 2 | 0.02642 | 80.19756 | 1.89617 | 0.38904 | 0.01614 | 8.4983 | 7.82309 | 1.15286 |
| 3 | 0.04793 | 61.07213 | 1.79602 | 1.46392 | 0.21004 | 27.21808 | 7.34092 | 0.93649 |
| 4 | 0.09444 | 48.26298 | 6.05166 | 1.00878 | 2.33838 | 30.11781 | 10.77132 | 1.43688 |
| 5 | 0.04111 | 38.86444 | 6.89306 | 0.95321 | 10.51809 | 24.88367 | 15.31345 | 2.61018 |
| 6 | 0.07439 | 31.58043 | 5.14293 | 1.60678 | 15.9649 | 20.95409 | 21.90103 | 2.92125 |
| 7 | 0.07039 | 27.3731 | 5.23869 | 2.3259 | 15.48904 | 21.80547 | 25.31351 | 2.45179 |
| 8 | 0.09172 | 25.01815 | 5.40247 | 2.4154 | 13.97588 | 24.84384 | 26.36582 | 2.05364 |
| 9 | 0.11117 | 24.07645 | 4.93682 | 2.13853 | 13.07808 | 26.59145 | 27.30454 | 1.78482 |
| 10 | 0.06304 | 23.96772 | 4.5089 | 1.96726 | 12.36968 | 27.23405 | 28.1668 | 1.6897 |
| 11 | 0.1295 | 24.22285 | 4.29938 | 1.92374 | 11.50914 | 27.60699 | 28.81192 | 1.65327 |
| 12 | 0.05609 | 24.21947 | 4.15354 | 1.93988 | 11.17518 | 27.71136 | 29.21589 | 1.55658 |
| 13 | 0.09017 | 24.11485 | 4.43411 | 1.9123 | 11.2414 | 27.44178 | 29.28908 | 1.49808 |
| 14 | 0.10479 | 23.75325 | 5.0351 | 2.13766 | 11.50924 | 26.90724 | 29.11073 | 1.48679 |
| 15 | 0.09456 | 23.38903 | 5.35229 | 2.90684 | 1156786.9996 | 26.68382 | 28.63542 | 1.46943 |
| 16 | 0.10775 | 22.80885 | 5.51564 | 3.89579 | 11.26928 | 27.32772 | 27.80869 | 1.41112 |
| 17 | 0.14629 | 21.98509 | 5.84277 | 4.77636 | 10.74959 | 28.6756 | 26.63784 | 1.30445 |
| 18 | 0.11912 | 21.08472 | 6.33147 | 5.10996 | 10.36302 | 30.2377 | 25.64932 | 1.27842 |
| 19 | 0.09877 | 20.23258 | 6.71344 | 5.08929 | 10.04628 | 31.60989 | 25.03608 | 1.21295 |
| 20 | 0.11584 | 19.56506 | 6.998 | 4.91568 | 9.83756 | 32.63112 | 24.85332 | 1.28206 |
| Cholesky Ordering:LNGDP LNC LNG lni LNNX Lntiv LNCS | ||||||||
Least squares OLS regression
| Variable | Coefficient | Std.error | T-Statistic | Prob. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | -2133.652 | 444.6522 | -4.730225 | 0.0000 |
| X1 | 0.254331 | 0.073226 | 3.261251 | 0.0016 |
| X2 | 1.465123 | 0.057223 | 26.03155 | 0.0000 |
| X3 | 0.341162 | 0.352251 | 0.932651 | 0.3681 |
| X4 | 11.23551 | 4.641622 | 3.820013 | 0.0005 |
| X5 | -2.953251 | 1.636952 | -1.754662 | 0.0835 |
| X6 | -0.000265 | 8.12E-05 | -3.026631 | 0.0035 |
| R-squared= | 0.992166 | Prob(F-statistic) | =0.000000 | DW=0.669522 |
The ADF unit root test results of the sequence
| Sequence | Test type (c,t,n) | ADF statistic | Critical value(1%,5%,10%) | P value | Test conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lnGDP | (c,t,1) | -2.950332 | (4.2839, -3.64942, -3.18816) | 0.3736 | Uneven stability |
| ΔlnGDP | (c,t,1) | -2.658842 | (4.43536, -3.6879, -3.22979) | 0.1466 | Uneven stability |
| Δ2lnGDP | (c,t,0) | -5.036151*** | (4.51379, -3.66272, -3.27613) | 0.0519 | Smoothness |
| lnDI | (c,t,2) | -2.056326 | (4.67817, -3.48604, -3.10642) | 0.7093 | Smoothness |
| ΔlnDI | (c,t,1) | -3.261152 | (4.51428, -3.57928, -3.08134) | 0.1344 | Uneven stability |
| Δ2lnDI | (c,t,2) | -2.919522 | (4.45497, -3.6862, -3.2658) | 0.1442 | Uneven stability |
| lnFDI | (c,t,2) | -3.584622* | (4.44747, -3.69755, -3.11141) | 0.1846 | Smoothness |
| ΔlnFDI | (c,t,0) | -3.598455*** | (4.38435, -3.68442, -3.16157) | 0.0019 | Uneven stability |
| Δ2lnFDI | (c,t,3) | -5.532632*** | (4.52978, -3.71165, -3.19359) | 0.0962 | Smoothness |
| lnL | (c,t,1) | -2.362152 | (4.44082, -3.40217, -3.14687) | 0.1579 | |
| ΔlnL | (c,t,0) | -5.031162*** | (4.46693, -3.70134, -3.22446) | 0.0304 | Smoothness |
| Δ2lnL | (c,t,0) | -6.952263*** | (4.52884, -3.66022, -3.45295) | 0.0001 | Uneven stability |
Granger causality test
| Original hypothesis | F statistic | P value |
|---|---|---|
| Di is not the granger reason for GDP | 6.75032*** | 0.0038 |
| GDP is not di’s granger reason | 3.85562** | 0.0349 |
| FDI is not the granger reason for GDP | 3.04122* | 0.0637 |
| GDP is not the reason for the granger of FDI | 1.52155 | 0.2831 |
| L is not the granger reason of GDP | 5.88965*** | 0.0072 |
| GDP is not the granger reason for L | 2.31662 | 0.1206 |
| FDI is not di’s granger reason | 3.95223** | 0.0291 |
| Di is not the reason for the granger of FDI | 4.59211** | 0.0185 |
| L is not di’s granger reason | 0.25705 | 0.8639 |
| Di is not the granger reason for L | 9.45112*** | 0.0041 |
| L is not the reason for the granger of FDI | 2.63551* | 0.0924 |
| FDI is not the granger reason for L | 1.28155 | 0.3154 |
