Research on Legal Education Enabling New Quality Productivity Development in the Context of Big Data
Mar 24, 2025
About this article
Published Online: Mar 24, 2025
Received: Oct 23, 2024
Accepted: Feb 18, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0759
Keywords
© 2025 Ping Liu, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Representative city
| Conditional variable | ||
|---|---|---|
| High level traditional industrial technology innovation | A1 | Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Hangzhou State, Suzhou, Nanjing, Wuhan, Xi ‘an, Chengdu, Hefei and heavy Qing, Qingdao, Tianjin, Zhengzhou |
| A2 | Dongguan, Foshan, Nantong | |
| A3 | Shaoxing, Wenzhou | |
| A4 | Shenzhen, Wuxi, Xiamen | |
| High-tech innovation of high level strategic emerging industries | B1 | Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Hangzhou, Nanjing, Suzhou, Wuhan, Chengdu, Xi ‘an, Hefei, Chongqing, Qingdao, Tianjin |
| B2 | Dongguan, Foshan, Nantong | |
| B3 | Shenzhen, Wuxi, Xiamen | |
| High level future industrial technology innovation | C1 | Beijing, Shanghai, Hangzhou, Guangzhou, Nanjing, Wuhan, Suzhou, Chengdu, Xi ‘an, Hefei, Qingdao, Chongqing, Jinan,Tianjin |
| C2 | Shenzhen, Wuxi, Xiamen |
Random effect model
| FGLS | FGLS | MLE | MLE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LE | 0.0475*** |
0.0357*** |
0.0468 |
0.278*** |
| CLP | 0.0214* |
0.0423 |
||
| HT | 0.0496*** |
0.0277*** |
||
| SAT | 0.322*** |
0.242*** |
||
| LNATE | 0.00245 |
-0.00998* |
||
| _cons | 0.0132 |
-0.0189 |
0.0138*** |
-0.125*** |
| Sigma_u_cons | 0.0597*** |
0.0522*** |
||
| Sigma_e | ||||
| _cons | 0.0415*** |
0.0346*** |
||
| N | 2500 | 2500 | 2500 | 2500 |
Variable descriptive statistics
| Variable | N | Mean | SD | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New productivity(NP) | 2500 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.04 | 0.672 |
| Legal education(LE) | 2500 | 0.52 | 0.224 | 0 | 1 |
| Education discipline setting (EDS) | 2500 | 0.074 | 0.105 | 0 | 1 |
| Talent training mode (TTM) | 2500 | 0.043 | 0.0628 | 0 | 1 |
| Complex legal personnel (CLP) | 2500 | 0.0239 | 0 | 1 | |
| High-tech (HT) | 2500 | 0.224 | 0.322 | 0 | 3.124 |
| Science and technology (SAT) | 2500 | 0.0826 | 0.0358 | 0 | 0.418 |
| Large number according to education (LNATE) | 2500 | 0.394 | 0.129 | 0.024 | 1.022 |
The condition group state sufficiency analysis
| Conditional variable | High level traditional industrial technology innovation | High-tech innovation of high level strategic emerging industries | High level future industrial technology innovation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 | B1 | B2 | B3 | C1 | C2 | |
| Leading talent | ○ | × | × | ○ | ○ | × | ○ | ● | ● |
| Basic science | ○ | × | × | × | ○ | × | × | ○ | × |
| Talent | ○ | ○ | × | ○ | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| Technical talent | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| Social environment | × | ○ | ○ | × | ○ | ○ | |||
| Education environment | ○ | × | × | × | ○ | × | × | ○ | × |
| Innovation support | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| Policy environment | ○ | × | × | ○ | ○ | × | ○ | ● | ● |
| Original coverage | 0.5143 | 0.1332 | 0.0826 | 0.0937 | 0.5128 | 0.1252 | 0.0922 | 0.5143 | 0.0915 |
| Unique coverage | 0.4336 | 0.0846 | 0.0326 | 0.0341 | 0.4534 | 0.0936 | 0.0306 | 0.4639 | 0.0352 |
| consistency | 0.9445 | 0.8667 | 0.9563 | 0.9847 | 0.9925 | 0.8475 | 0.9956 | 0.9985 | 0.9979 |
| Overall resolution | 0.6639 | 0.6422 | 0.5528 | ||||||
| Overall solution consistency | 0.9253 | 0.9635 | 0.9977 | ||||||
Fixed effect model results
| Variable | Individual fixation effect | Individual fixation effect | Individual fixation effect -LSDV | Individual fixation effect -LSDV | Two-way fixed effect - individual/time | Two-way fixed effect - individual/time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | |
| LE | 0.0185*** |
0.0168*** |
0.0182*** |
0.0179*** |
0.245*** |
0.213*** |
| CLP | -0.00422*** |
-0.00428 |
-0.00268** |
|||
| HT | -0.0442** |
-0.0442*** |
-0.0436** |
|||
| SAT | -0.0385 |
-0.0385 |
-0.0122 |
|||
| LNATE | -0.0214*** |
-0.0214*** |
-0.0147* |
|||
| 2014 | -0.0285** |
-0.0254*** |
||||
| 2015 | -0.0524*** |
-0.0478*** |
||||
| 2016 | -0.0635*** |
-0.0568*** |
||||
| 2017 | -0.0798*** |
-0.0705*** |
||||
| 2018 | -0.0945*** |
-0.0845*** |
||||
| 2019 | -0.125*** |
-0.0985*** |
||||
| 2020 | -0.119*** |
-0.115*** |
||||
| 2021 | -0.128*** |
-0.112*** |
||||
| 2022 | -0.134*** |
-0.115*** |
||||
| 2023 | -0.145*** |
-0.134*** |
||||
| _cons | 0.0272*** |
0.0489*** |
0.378*** |
0.436*** |
0.00512 |
0.0240*** |
| N | 2500 | 2500 | 2500 | 2500 | 2500 | 2500 |
| R2 | 0.063 | 0.163 | 0.879 | 0.895 | 0.148 | 0.227 |
| Adj.R2 | 0.063 | 0.162 | 0.874 | 0.896 | 0.137 | 0.225 |
