Study on Synergistic Promotion of Party Building Leading Rural Ecological Construction and Social Governance Modernization under the Perspective of Common Wealth

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

The basic situation of the investigators is counted

Question	Options	Number	Proportion
Age	Under 30	112	9.33%
	31-50	232	19.33%
	51-65	548	45.67%
	Over 60	308	25.67%
Political appearance	Party member	352	29.33%
	League member	98	8.17%
	Masses	714	59.50%
	Democrats	36	3.00%
Major occupational identity	Party cadres of the town committee	130	10.83%
	Village cadre	211	17.58%
	The head of the rural social organization	76	6.33%
	The head of the rural economic organization	75	6.25%
	Farm man	612	51.00%
	Migrant workers	40	3.33%
	Self-employed	56	4.67%

The modernization of rural government governance ability

Index code	Index name	Index meaning	Index standard	Index weight
SOGC	Social governance capability			0.5
SOGC1	Endowment coverage	Old-age protection	=100%	0.42
SOGC2	Coverage coverage	Health care	=100%	0.28
SOGC3	Per capita housing area	Housing capability	≥30m2	0.19
SOGC4	Urban population registration unemployment	Employment promotion	≤3%	0.11
EGGC	Ecological governance capability			0.5
EGGC1	Environmental spending is the GDP ratio	Support for environmental protection	≥2.5%	0.54
EGGC2	Urban sewage treatment rate	Environmental governance ability	=100%	0.33
EGGC3	Forest coverage	Ecological capacity	≥40%	0.17

Degree of implementation

%	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H
SOGC	95.61	96.33	87.24	91.84	90.05	90.32	87.73	92.14
SOGC1	95.09	97.63	94.12	98.25	95.37	95.48	93.25	95.91
SOGC2	98.77	97.85	85.76	98.26	98.13	97.24	97.07	90.73
SOGC3	100	90.8	77.78	77.45	74.58	68.18	67.89	94.39
SOGC4	79.22	100	86.39	83.24	77.85	86.38	77.95	78.93
EGGC	58.73	60.25	23.58	53.95	34.15	50.36	66.58	72.24
EGGC1	71.45	100	30.2	70.82	28.54	65.98	100	75.26
EGGC2	56.47	14.28	16.92	31.89	51.97	20.03	18.25	86.73
EGGC3	30.54	25.53	16.78	43.32	22.35	52.87	50.26	40.36
Collaborative governance	57.12	50.22	50.30	49.17	51.95	50.34	49.28	50.45

Rural grassroots party organizations and party members play a role

Question	Options	N	Proportion
The party members actively visit the villagers	Not visit	184	15.3%
	Not very often	131	10.9%
	Occasionally visit	360	30%
	Frequent visits	526	43.8%
How does the village party branch wave in major matters	It’s a good solution	640	53.3%
	Better solution	409	34.1%
	Unsolvable	151	12.6%
How does the village party branch drive the development of village level industry	Very good	298	24.8%
	Better	481	40.1%
	General	407	33.9%
	Worse	14	1.2%

The village clean action quantitative index statistics

Time span	Clean up the amount of waste in rural life (tons)	Clean up the amount of silt in the village (ton)	The quantity of waste of agricultural waste such as livestock and livestock manure (tons)	Clean up the number of old billboards (frequency)	Clean up the number of village ponds (frequency)
1-2 moon	1442	25	60	160	20
1-3 moon	2564	60	163	211	27
1-4 moon	3154	63	184	275	36
1-5 moon	3328	74	216	382	47
1-10 moon	5890	86	314	525	89