Machine learning-based state prediction and optimization of orthogonal iterative abort strategy for unbalanced power grids
, and
Mar 21, 2025
About this article
Published Online: Mar 21, 2025
Received: Nov 11, 2024
Accepted: Feb 24, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0618
Keywords
© 2025 Lei Wu et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

The results of the prediction of the operation section of the grid
| Project | Bus qualification (%) | Line qualification (%) | Voltage qualification (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reforecast | 99.31 | 89.81 | 98.66 |
The parameters of the simulation system
| Parameter | Value | Parameter | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Udc/V | 500 | C/μF | 60 |
| LS/mH | 15 | S*/(Kv·A) | 15 |
| Rs/Ω | 0.2 | f/Hz | 60 |
| Lg/mH | 3 |
The comparison of the control of the balance of the grid
| Time/s | Current inequality | Active fluctuation/W | Reactive fluctuation/war | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance current control | Ours | Balance current control | Ours | Balance current control | Ours | |
| 0~0.1 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 50 | 50 | 70 | 70 |
| 0.1~0.2 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 838 | 611 | 1083 | 1002 |
Initial forecast results
| Project | Bus qualification (%) | Line qualification (%) | Voltage qualification (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single cross matching | 88.98 | 72.33 | 87.59 |
| Similar day matching | 96.21 | 85.05 | 99.38 |
