Research on the Intelligent Optimization Method of Digital Communication Path of Ice and Snow Sports and Cultural Elements
Mar 19, 2025
About this article
Published Online: Mar 19, 2025
Received: Oct 27, 2024
Accepted: Feb 13, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0477
Keywords
© 2025 Liang Han, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Intermediate solution results
| Frequency cutoff:2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Consistency cutoff:0.959805 | |||
| Raw coverage | Unique coverage | Consistency | |
| ~SE*PE*EI*PU*IDW | 0.318853 | 0.0343125 | 0.960207 |
| SOE*EI*RE*PU*IDW | 0.656437 | 0.384211 | 0.969875 |
| ~SE*SOE*PE*~RE*PU*IDW | 0.248606 | 0.00627889 | 0.969376 |
| Solution coverage:0.709325 | |||
| Solution consistency:0.961517 |
Variable calibration score
| Predependent variable | SE | SOE | PE | EI | RE | PU | IDW | IDB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95% quantile | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 |
| 50% quantile | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.73 |
| 5% quantile | 2.65 | 3.00 | 2.65 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.65 | 2.45 |
The high-level information propagation behavior group state
| Conditional variable | The high-level information propagation behavior group state | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | C2 | C3 | |
| SE | § | § | |
| SOE | ¤ | ¤ | |
| PE | ¤ | ¤ | |
| EI | ¤ | ¤ | |
| RE | ¤ | § | |
| PU | ¤ | ¤ | |
| IDW | ¤ | ¤ | |
| Consistency | 0.960207 | 0.969875 | 0.969376 |
| Raw coverage | 0.318853 | 0.656437 | 0.248606 |
| Unique coverage | 0.0343125 | 0.384211 | 0.00627889 |
| Solution coverage | 0.709325 | ||
| Solution consistency | 0.961517 | ||
Simple solution
| Frequency cutoff:2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Consistency cutoff:0.959766 | |||
| Raw coverage | Unique coverage | Consistency | |
| PE*EI*IDW | 0.685389 | 0.0485678 | 0.960036 |
| SOE*RE*PU*IDW | 0.673296 | 0.0127385 | 0.967285 |
| SOE*PE*~EI | 0.299208 | 0.00538869 | 0.918469 |
| SOE*~EI*PU | 0.329986 | 0.0120469 | 0.911687 |
| SOE*~EI*IDW | 0.327433 | 0.00863246 | 0.949568 |
| SOE*PE*IDW | 0.659246 | 0.00109605 | 0.970411 |
| Solution coverag:0.795985 | |||
| Solution consistency:0.920563 |
User culture elements propagate behavior
| SE | SOE | PE | EI | RE | PU | IDW | Number | IDB | Raw | PRI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 81 | 1 | 0.97889 | 0.96871 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0.98035 | 0.89407 |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 0.97864 | 0.88945 |
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0.96754 | 0.7882 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0.97151 | 0.78534 |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0.96961 | 0.75707 |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0.96443 | 0.73196 |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.95976 | 0.72047 |
Network opinion leader network center analysis
| Number | Degree of degree | Intermediate center | Proximity center | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Point of entry | Point of point | Point of entry | Point of point | ||
| 4 | 32 | 24 | 931.468 | 1.142 | 42.44 |
| 7 | 24 | 5 | -0.002 | 1.155 | 0.458 |
| 14 | 39 | 27 | 1329.819 | 1.137 | 38.833 |
| 20 | 20 | 0 | 0.001 | 1.151 | 0.453 |
| 26 | 15 | 55 | 2250.844 | 1.142 | 48.665 |
| 30 | 20 | 40 | 1008.741 | 1.138 | 46.299 |
| 35 | 3 | 45 | 659.182 | 1.138 | 44.784 |
| 39 | 29 | 37 | 1100.43 | 1.142 | 44.601 |
| 40 | 38 | 10 | 735.769 | 1.141 | 37.694 |
| 44 | 55 | 2 | -0.003 | 1.185 | 0.45 |
| 54 | 8 | 2 | -0.002 | 1.166 | 0.456 |
| 53 | 39 | 60 | 3147.566 | 1.142 | 50.347 |
| 57 | 5 | 72 | 941.89 | 1.127 | 53.547 |
| 63 | 12 | 57 | 2071.452 | 1.137 | 48.028 |
| 79 | 32 | 15 | 552.177 | 1.14 | 37.89 |
| 110 | 39 | 7 | 573.175 | 1.145 | 34.487 |
| 117 | 4 | 70 | 1182.809 | 1.138 | 51.532 |
| 138 | 11 | 47 | 785.078 | 1.137 | 48.452 |
| 139 | 59 | 43 | 4782.496 | 1.143 | 47.198 |
| 149 | 15 | 45 | 1439.679 | 1.141 | 46.299 |
| 151 | 17 | 28 | 889.613 | 1.137 | 45.44 |
| 153 | 15 | 21 | 1055.204 | 1.138 | 38.695 |
| 167 | 37 | 27 | 2035.956 | 1.141 | 41.247 |
| 169 | 8 | 57 | 1146.632 | 1.136 | 46.694 |
| 172 | 10 | 42 | 758.193 | 1.134 | 45.341 |
| 174 | -2 | 41 | 408.982 | 1.125 | 47.509 |
| 184 | 31 | 1 | -0.001 | 1.148 | 0.451 |
| 186 | 32 | 17 | 440.521 | 1.144 | 38.157 |
| 188 | 19 | 60 | 1391.888 | 1.139 | 49.213 |
| 216 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1.163 | 0.453 |
| 219 | 7 | 21 | 1415.074 | 1.134 | 39.249 |
| 225 | 8 | 3 | -0.001 | 1.174 | 0.457 |
Network opinion leader structure hole analysis
| 17 | 46.047 | 0.84 | 0.074 | 0.084 |
| 28 | 53.354 | 0.846 | 0.068 | 0.114 |
| 34 | 41.913 | 0.855 | 0.086 | 0.116 |
| 42 | 42.488 | 0.819 | 0.077 | 0.056 |
| 54 | 56.297 | 0.815 | 0.064 | 0.079 |
| 57 | 63.758 | 0.874 | 0.059 | 0.108 |
| 66 | 55.359 | 0.878 | 0.064 | 0.089 |
| 108 | 32.498 | 0.812 | 0.098 | 0.069 |
| 115 | 60.213 | 0.885 | 0.059 | 0.097 |
| 139 | 56.614 | 0.821 | 0.062 | 0.069 |
| 145 | 37.105 | 0.825 | 0.089 | 0.118 |
| 166 | 41.555 | 0.829 | 0.08 | 0.064 |
| 168 | 50.587 | 0.887 | 0.076 | 0.16 |
| 172 | 40.458 | 0.827 | 0.086 | 0.092 |
| 176 | 34.011 | 0.81 | 0.093 | 0.056 |
| 190 | 53.275 | 0.832 | 0.07 | 0.11 |
| 215 | 26.833 | 0.892 | 0.113 | 0.103 |
| 219 | 26.047 | 0.892 | 0.112 | 0.112 |
