A study on the application of sensor network for teaching rock climbing in college students’ health monitoring
and
Mar 19, 2025
About this article
Published Online: Mar 19, 2025
Received: Nov 07, 2024
Accepted: Feb 09, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0448
Keywords
© 2025 Hui Zhang et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Test results of the upper limb strength of the experimental and control group
| Test index | Test content | Pre-test (average) | Post-test (average) | t | P | Mean error reduction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The lead is up (per) | Experimental group | 21.45 | 32.16 | 16.43 | 0.000 | 10.71 |
| Control group | 21.12 | 26.45 | 21.46 | 0.000 | 5.33 | |
| T | 0.296 | 4.734 | ||||
| P | 0.664 | 0.000 | ||||
| Hanging high (the mean of the right hand) (cm) | Experimental group | 51.46 | 61.25 | -13.742 | 0.000 | 9.79 |
| Control group | 51.88 | 55.54 | -10.989 | 0.000 | 3.66 | |
| T | -0.035 | 2.456 | ||||
| P | 0.781 | 0.024 |
Test results of blood pressure parameter experimental data
| Test frequency | Pulse pulse time (ms) | The calculation of the systolic pressure (mmHg) | Shrinkage absolute error (mmHg) | The calculation of the diastolic pressure (mmHg) | Absolute diastolic error (mmHg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23.26 | 120 | 4 | 83 | 6 |
| 2 | 23.79 | 119 | 3 | 80 | 4 |
| 3 | 23.11 | 116 | 4 | 84 | 7 |
| 4 | 23.67 | 111 | 3 | 81 | 2 |
| 5 | 24.19 | 110 | 1 | 74 | -2 |
| 6 | 25.30 | 109 | -1 | 71 | 8 |
| 7 | 27.43 | 107 | -5 | 84 | 9 |
| 8 | 27.55 | 105 | -5 | 86 | 9 |
| 9 | 27.75 | 105 | -5 | 86 | 11 |
| 10 | 27.73 | 105 | -5 | 85 | 10 |
Two groups of student skills evaluation score comparison
| Group | Technical review | Experimental group | Control group | t | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-test (average) | Stability of solids | 75.44 | 75.21 | 0.124 | 0.801 |
| Accuracy of point technique | 77.61 | 76.89 | 0.424 | 0.650 | |
| Timing and strength control | 72.94 | 72.45 | 0.311 | 0.735 | |
| The center adjusts the fitness of the technology | 73.45 | 74.12 | -0.271 | 0.699 | |
| Proficiency in continuous action | 75.11 | 73.61 | 0.763 | 0.461 | |
| Process of action | 75.78 | 74.28 | 0.678 | 0.511 | |
| Post-test (average) | Stability of solids | 88.78 | 80.78 | 3.271 | 0.008 |
| Accuracy of point technique | 90.61 | 81.61 | 3.920 | 0.002 | |
| Timing and strength control | 84.28 | 77.44 | 3.107 | 0.009 | |
| The center adjusts the fitness of the technology | 86.45 | 78.78 | 2.891 | 0.015 | |
| Proficiency in continuous action | 86.64 | 78.61 | 3.626 | 0.004 | |
| Process of action | 88.11 | 79.28 | 4.059 | 0.001 |
Heart rate experimental results
| Female | Tester 1 | Tester 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test frequency | System test results | MAX30102 test results | Absolute error | System test results | MAX30102 test results | Absolute error |
| 1 | 73 | 73 | 0 | 67 | 66 | 1 |
| 2 | 82 | 81 | 1 | 83 | 82 | 1 |
| 3 | 76 | 77 | -1 | 87 | 88 | -1 |
| 4 | 80 | 81 | -1 | 70 | 69 | 1 |
| 5 | 70 | 71 | -1 | 81 | 78 | 3 |
Blood oxygen experimental data test results
| Blood oxygen SaO2 | Tester 1 | Tester 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test frequency | System test results (%) | MAX30102 test results (%) | Absolute error (%) | System test results (%) | MAX30102 test results (%) | Absolute error (%) |
| 1 | 99 | 98 | 1 | 99 | 99 | 0 |
| 2 | 100 | 99 | 1 | 100 | 99 | 1 |
| 3 | 99 | 99 | 0 | 100 | 99 | 1 |
| 4 | 100 | 99 | 1 | 99 | 98 | 1 |
| 5 | 99 | 99 | 0 | 99 | 99 | 0 |
