Design of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Multi-Level Management Strategies for Internationalization Management in Higher Education and Its Feasibility Study
, and
Mar 19, 2025
About this article
Published Online: Mar 19, 2025
Received: Oct 20, 2024
Accepted: Feb 09, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0440
Keywords
© 2025 Yue Wang et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Evaluation index system
| Primary indicator | Index project | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Academic achievement | Published quantity | The number of papers published in core journals and general journals |
| Thesis quality | The presentation of the paper in the discussion of the peer-reviewed and the frequency of the frequency of the introduction | |
| Academic award | The number of academic prizes and their grades | |
| Professional test results | The achievements of the specific disciplines | |
| Research ability | Research project participation | The number of research projects and personal roles of different levels of research involved |
| Data analysis capability | The technique and efficiency of the analysis of the log | |
| Research innovation | The innovation and unique contribution of the research | |
| Research applicability | The practical application potential and effect of the research results | |
| Teaching ability | Teaching evaluation | The evaluation of the teaching effect of students and peers |
| Content update | The content of the teaching content is related to the latest research trend | |
| Classroom management | Effective management of class order and ability to arouse learning interest | |
| Guide the student study | To guide students’ ability and results in the research projects | |
| Occupational development ability | Internship and work experience | Internship and work experience during the study period |
| Occupational planning assessment | The clarity and feasibility of individual career planning | |
| Vocational training | Master the skills of the corresponding profession | |
| Employment and satisfaction | Employment and satisfaction after graduation | |
| Comprehensive quality | Leadership and teamwork | Leadership and teamwork ability in organizational activities and projects |
| Academic ethics and occupational ethics | Observe the performance of academic ethics and occupational ethics | |
| Cross-cultural communication | Communication and collaboration in international environment with different backgrounds | |
| Social responsibility and civic consciousness | Show attention to social issues and participate in improving social action | |
| International ability | Foreign language level | Fluency and application of foreign language |
| International exchange experience | Participate in the experience of international conference and exchange programs | |
| International cooperation project | Participate in the number and role of international scientific research cooperation | |
| International vision | Understanding and grasp of international academic and educational trends |
The subjective and objective weight of the index
| Secondary indicator | AHP weight | CRITIC weight | Composite weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published quantity | 0.035 | 0.018 | 0.028 |
| Thesis quality | 0.042 | 0.009 | 0.025 |
| Academic award | 0.036 | 0.016 | 0.025 |
| Professional test results | 0.024 | 0.039 | 0.033 |
| Research project participation | 0.018 | 0.036 | 0.024 |
| Data analysis capability | 0.022 | 0.034 | 0.028 |
| Research innovation | 0.045 | 0.032 | 0.036 |
| Research applicability | 0.032 | 0.056 | 0.047 |
| Teaching evaluation | 0.058 | 0.058 | 0.058 |
| Content update | 0.078 | 0.051 | 0.062 |
| Classroom management | 0.035 | 0.069 | 0.057 |
| Guide the student study | 0.044 | 0.094 | 0.079 |
| Internship and work experience | 0.056 | 0.041 | 0.044 |
| Occupational planning assessment | 0.063 | 0.045 | 0.057 |
| Vocational training | 0.045 | 0.074 | 0.062 |
| Employment and satisfaction | 0.059 | 0.039 | 0.055 |
| Leadership and teamwork | 0.045 | 0.031 | 0.035 |
| Academic ethics and occupational ethics | 0.031 | 0.048 | 0.042 |
| Cross-cultural communication | 0.013 | 0.025 | 0.021 |
| Social responsibility and civic consciousness | 0.058 | 0.048 | 0.054 |
| Foreign language level | 0.016 | 0.035 | 0.022 |
| International exchange experience | 0.022 | 0.041 | 0.036 |
| International cooperation project | 0.018 | 0.032 | 0.024 |
| International vision | 0.059 | 0.041 | 0.046 |
The education management evaluation index comprehensive weight
| Primary indicator | Weighting | Secondary indicator | Weighting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Academic achievement | 0.111 | Published quantity | 0.028 |
| Thesis quality | 0.025 | ||
| Academic award | 0.025 | ||
| Professional test results | 0.033 | ||
| Research ability | 0.135 | Research project participation | 0.024 |
| Data analysis capability | 0.028 | ||
| Research innovation | 0.036 | ||
| Research applicability | 0.047 | ||
| Teaching ability | 0.256 | Teaching evaluation | 0.058 |
| Content update | 0.062 | ||
| Classroom management | 0.057 | ||
| Guide the student study | 0.079 | ||
| Occupational development ability | 0.218 | Internship and work experience | 0.044 |
| Occupational planning assessment | 0.057 | ||
| Vocational training | 0.062 | ||
| Employment and satisfaction | 0.055 | ||
| Comprehensive quality | 0.152 | Leadership and teamwork | 0.035 |
| Academic ethics and occupational ethics | 0.042 | ||
| Cross-cultural communication | 0.021 | ||
| Social responsibility and civic consciousness | 0.054 | ||
| International ability | 0.128 | Foreign language level | 0.022 |
| International exchange experience | 0.036 | ||
| International cooperation project | 0.024 | ||
| International vision | 0.046 |
Standard grade
| Standard grade | Interval |
|---|---|
| Difference (S1) | [0,28] |
| Worse (S2) | [23,50] |
| Medium(S3) | [48,78] |
| Better(S4) | [76,88] |
| Good(S5) | [85,100] |
