A study of the impact of financial new quality productivity on the modernization of the rural industrial chain supply chain
Mar 19, 2025
About this article
Published Online: Mar 19, 2025
Received: Oct 29, 2024
Accepted: Feb 09, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0422
Keywords
© 2025 Qianyun Yang, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The results of the test results
| Absolute convergence | Conditional convergence | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Random effect | Fixed effect | Random effect | Fixed effect | |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
| β | -0.041 |
-0.250 |
-0.079 |
-0.311 |
| Control variable | NO | NO | YES | YES |
| Convergence rate(%) | 0.324 | 2.089 | 0.607 | 2.675 |
| Half convergence period | 6.337 | 4.547 | 5.678 | 4.296 |
| Constant term | -0.051 |
-0.347 |
-0.102 |
1.335 |
| Sample size | 410 | 410 | 410 | 410 |
| R2 | 0.013 | 0.020 | 0.041 | 0.119 |
Calculation result
| Darum gini coefficient | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall gini coefficient | 0.229 | 0.199 | 0.207 | 0.212 | 0.194 | 0.219 | 0.201 | 0.201 | |
| Decomposition contribution | Group internal differences and contribution rate/% | 0.056 | 0.051 | 0.03 | 0.045 | 0.047 | 0.044 | 0.039 | 0.039 |
| 22.13 | 22.17 | 20.65 | 20.53 | 21.11 | 20.08 | 18.58 | 18.87 | ||
| Group internal differences and contribution rate/% | 0.143 | 0.136 | 0.142 | 0.145 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.136 | 0.134 | |
| 60.75 | 61.56 | 63.37 | 65.44 | 62.76 | 65.33 | 65.81 | 65.72 | ||
| Supervariable density and contribution rate/% | 0.03 | 0.025 | 0.024 | 0.019 | 0.026 | 0.02 | 0.021 | 0.021 | |
| 11.77 | 10.88 | 9.87 | 7.88 | 10.56 | 8.35 | 9.45 | 9.78 | ||
| Intergroup difference | Northeast | 0.041 | 0.03 | 0.075 | 0.072 | 0.067 | 0.089 | 0.062 | 0.077 |
| East | 0.234 | 0.211 | 0.224 | 0.209 | 0.212 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.157 | |
| Middle | 0.09 | 0.134 | 0.114 | 0.114 | 0.124 | 0.124 | 0.112 | 0.109 | |
| West | 0.094 | 0.11 | 0.116 | 0.104 | 0.139 | 0.121 | 0.142 | 0.143 | |
| Intergroup difference | East & central | 0.253 | 0.238 | 0.234 | 0.224 | 0.17 | 0.202 | 0.191 | 0.185 |
| East & west | 0.309 | 0.279 | 0.301 | 0.309 | 0.267 | 0.298 | 0.298 | 0.279 | |
| Northeast & east | 0.269 | 0.245 | 0.311 | 0.303 | 0.247 | 0.291 | 0.309 | 0.319 | |
| Middle & west | 0.144 | 0.146 | 0.151 | 0.159 | 0.155 | 0.162 | 0.161 | 0.178 | |
| Northeast & west | 0.113 | 0.094 | 0.098 | 0.093 | 0.102 | 0.111 | 0.095 | 0.09 | |
| Northeast & central | 0.092 | 0.114 | 0.121 | 0.153 | 0.119 | 0.14 | 0.164 | 0.169 | |
Heterogeneity analysis results
| (1) | (4) | (3) | (2) | (5) | (6) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dnqp | 0.377*** | 0.171*** | 0.129* | 0.158** | 0.317*** | 0.148** |
| (3.367) | (2.685) | (1.803) | (2.186) | (3.276) | (2.272) | |
| Control variable | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Constant | 14.887*** | 9.756*** | 8.534*** | 10.752*** | 13.893*** | 9.766*** |
| (14.856) | (11.096) | (9.231) | (10.477) | (12.757) | (11.674) | |
| R2 | 0.639 | 0.618 | 0.622 | 0.611 | 0.633 | 0.606 |
| Observed value | 100 | 23 | 111 | 56 | 144 | 166 |
| Provincial fixation effect | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Year fixed effect | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
The results of the test results of the β convergence in the four regions
| Absolute convergence | Conditional convergence | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
| β | -0.271 |
-0.153 |
-0.279 |
-0.729 |
-0.425 |
-0.468 |
-0.391 |
-0.923 |
| [0.055] | [0.068] | [0.075] | [0.219] | [0.067] | [0.101] | [0.08] | [0.201] | |
| Control variable | NO | NO | NO | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Convergence rate(%) | 2.216 | 1.156 | 2.246 | 8.562 | 4.001 | 4.543 | 3.584 | 17.552 |
| Half convergence period | 4.326 | 4.976 | 4.376 | 3.022 | 3.877 | 3.755 | 4.007 | 2.131 |
| Constant term | -0.301 |
-0.222 |
-0.435 |
-1.013 |
-0.486 |
-0.708 |
-0.664 |
-1.365 |
| [0.067] | [0.111] | [0.121] | [0.318] | [0.078] | [0.178] | [0.134] | [0.302] | |
| Sample size | 130 | 81 | 151 | 38 | 130 | 81 | 151 | 38 |
| R2 | 0.141 | 0.055 | 0.078 | 0.221 | 0.242 | 0.235 | 0.163 | 0.432 |
Industrial chain modernization evaluation index system
| Primary indicator | Secondary indicator | Tertiary index |
|---|---|---|
| Industrial chain modernization | Industrial chain digitization | Digital basis |
| Digital service | ||
| Digital output | ||
| Chain toughness | High-end leadership | |
| Chain control | ||
| profitability | ||
| Industrial chain innovation | Innovative investment | |
| Innovative output | ||
| Industrial chain cooperation | Industrial synergy | |
| Innovation synergy | ||
| Industrial chain sustainability | Energy-saving production | |
| Pollution discharge | ||
| Green governance |
Index evaluation system for new quality of financial productivity
| Primary indicator | Secondary indicator | Tertiary index |
|---|---|---|
| Technological innovation | Innovative environment | Scientific research |
| Innovative activity | ||
| Innovative investment | Investment strength of r&d funds | |
| R&d personnel | ||
| Innovative results | Patent authorization | |
| Technological transformation | ||
| New quality industry | Future industry | Artificial intelligence |
| Computer and software practitioners | ||
| Digital industry | Digital economy | |
| Real integration | ||
| Emerging industries | The number of new and new technology professionals is the ratio | |
| Green state | Pollution reduction | Waste water discharge |
| Exhaust emission | ||
| Solid waste discharge | ||
| Energy consumption | Renewable energy | |
| Energy efficiency | ||
| Production factor | Technical assignment | Total factor productivity |
| Human resources | Human capital height | |
| Capital efficiency | Capital productivity | |
| Market system | Market degree |
Benchmark regression test results
| MIC | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | |
| Dnqp | 0.6574*** | 0.6193 | 0.5749 |
| (4.27) | (4.11) | (3.68) | |
| Maicsc | 1.1679*** | ||
| (1.84) | |||
| Fsal | 1.2957*** | ||
| (3.67) | |||
| Ur | 0.7327** | ||
| (2.11) | |||
| Oul | 2.1756*** | ||
| (7.54) | |||
| Wlr | 0.1174*** | ||
| (5.43) | |||
| _cons | -9.3167** | -11.0845*** | -22.7356 |
| (-1.09) | (-6.21) | (-0.87) | |
| Individual fixation effect | Uncontrolled | Control | Control |
| Time fixed effect | Uncontrolled | Control | Control |
| R2 | 0.8845 | 0.9236 | 0.9758 |
| F | 53.0266 | 50.2716 | 35.0123 |
| N | 390 | 390 | 390 |
Endogenous test results
| Variable | Two stages of least squares | |
|---|---|---|
| Maicsc | MIC | |
| First stage | Second order | |
| Dnqp | 0.3467*** | |
| (5.78) | ||
| DTF | 0.0357*** | |
| (4.95) | ||
| Dnqp it×DTFit | 1.9584*** | 3.0257*** |
| (5.86) | (7.54) | |
| Control variable | Control | Control |
| _cons | -0.1001** | -0.2221*** |
| (-2.54) | (-2.97) | |
| Individual fixation effect | Control | Control |
| Time fixed effect | Control | Control |
| R2 | 0.9257 | 0.9845 |
| N | 390 | 390 |
The mediation effect tests the results
| (1) | (2) | |
|---|---|---|
| atp | atp | |
| Dnqp | 0.144*** | 0.387*** |
| (3.146) | (2.573) | |
| Control variable | YES | YES |
| Constant | 5.664*** | 4.766*** |
| (5.012) | (4.685) | |
| R2 | 0.689 | 0.697 |
| Observed value | 320 | 320 |
| Provincial fixation effect | YES | YES |
| Year fixed effect | YES | YES |
Provincial financial new quality productivity development index
| Region | Province | 2008 | 2010 | 2012 | 2014 | 2016 | 2018 | 2020 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eastern region | Beijing | 0.799 | 0.832 | 0.792 | 0.634 | 0.779 | 0.686 | 0.797 | 0.713 |
| Tianjin | 0.223 | 0.306 | 0.253 | 0.238 | 0.407 | 0.202 | 0.244 | 0.221 | |
| Hebei | 0.183 | 0.145 | 0.065 | 0.169 | 0.193 | 0.13 | 0.205 | 0.243 | |
| Shanghai | 0.534 | 0.378 | 0.244 | 0.415 | 0.35 | 0.411 | 0.492 | 0.396 | |
| Jiangsu | 0.269 | 0.343 | 0.348 | 0.245 | 0.366 | 0.307 | 0.279 | 0.394 | |
| Zhejiang | 0.158 | 0.324 | 0.181 | 0.288 | 0.109 | 0.199 | 0.491 | 0.296 | |
| Fujian | 0.171 | 0.239 | 0.244 | 0.46 | 0.282 | 0.162 | 0.351 | 0.213 | |
| Shandong | 0.142 | 0.084 | 0.236 | 0.328 | 0.353 | 0.379 | 0.3 | 0.162 | |
| Guangdong | 0.204 | 0.343 | 0.373 | 0.359 | 0.32 | 0.359 | 0.34 | 0.451 | |
| Hainan | 0.214 | 0.409 | 0.333 | 0.198 | 0.354 | 0.413 | 0.26 | 0.333 | |
| Mean | 0.288 | 0.34 | 0.307 | 0.333 | 0.351 | 0.325 | 0.376 | 0.308 | |
| Central region | Shanxi | 0.368 | 0.128 | 0.351 | 0.246 | 0.282 | 0.122 | 0.147 | 0.462 |
| Anhui | 0.083 | 0.198 | 0.288 | 0.241 | 0.063 | 0.265 | 0.3 | 0.143 | |
| Jiangxi | 0.234 | 0.24 | 0.084 | 0.025 | 0.082 | 0.218 | 0.134 | 0.286 | |
| Henan | 0.208 | 0.18 | 0.196 | 0.104 | 0.183 | 0.135 | 0.21 | 0.245 | |
| Hupei | 0.193 | 0.313 | 0.408 | 0.178 | 0.208 | 0.434 | 0.259 | 0.278 | |
| Hunan | 0.354 | 0.259 | 0.224 | 0.193 | 0.279 | 0.351 | 0.21 | 0.319 | |
| Mean | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.259 | 0.165 | 0.183 | 0.254 | 0.21 | 0.276 | |
| Western region | Inner Mongolia | 0.271 | 0.017 | 0.297 | 0.308 | 0.287 | 0.338 | 0.175 | 0.341 |
| Guangxi | 0.198 | 0.321 | 0.252 | 0.119 | 0.135 | 0.225 | 0.188 | 0.207 | |
| Chongqing | 0.126 | 0.304 | 0.178 | 0.066 | 0.284 | 0.193 | 0.054 | 0.256 | |
| Sichuan | 0.235 | 0.093 | 0.16 | 0.384 | 0.273 | 0.191 | 0.132 | 0.217 | |
| Guizhou | 0.25 | 0.116 | 0.178 | 0.182 | 0.271 | 0.198 | 0.216 | 0.314 | |
| Yunnan | 0.313 | 0.225 | 0.207 | 0.188 | 0.127 | 0.126 | 0.16 | 0.357 | |
| Shaanxi | 0.106 | 0.241 | 0.242 | 0.214 | 0.125 | 0.32 | 0.192 | 0.149 | |
| Kansu | 0.076 | 0.239 | 0.116 | 0.16 | 0.114 | 0.213 | 0.156 | 0.267 | |
| Qinghai | 0.198 | 0.149 | 0.212 | 0.383 | 0.168 | 0.289 | 0.203 | 0.092 | |
| Ningxia | 0.169 | 0.336 | 0.243 | 0.181 | 0.291 | 0.336 | 0.154 | 0.221 | |
| Xinjiang | 0.33 | 0.186 | 0.234 | 0.185 | 0.303 | 0.156 | 0.331 | 0.247 | |
| Mean | 0.207 | 0.202 | 0.211 | 0.215 | 0.216 | 0.235 | 0.178 | 0.242 | |
| Northeast | Liaoning | 0.211 | 0.159 | 0.494 | 0.251 | 0.174 | 0.171 | 0.278 | 0.269 |
| Jilin | 0.266 | 0.17 | 0.252 | 0.177 | 0.306 | 0.222 | 0.197 | 0.283 | |
| heilongjiang | 0.189 | 0.159 | 0.28 | 0.335 | 0.228 | 0.281 | 0.217 | 0.164 | |
| mean | 0.222 | 0.163 | 0.342 | 0.254 | 0.236 | 0.225 | 0.231 | 0.239 | |
| National mean | 0.242 | 0.248 | 0.266 | 0.248 | 0.257 | 0.268 | 0.256 | 0.285 | |
Robustness test results
| MIC | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Change the measure of the variable | Elimination of sample extreme values | Replacement estimation method | |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | |
| Dnqp | 0.3357*** | 0.4622*** | 0.2077** |
| (4.57) | (6.57) | (2.31) | |
| Control variable | Control | Control | Control |
| _cons | 0.1255** | 0.1579*** | 0.1284*** |
| (2.31) | (5.65) | (4.57) | |
| Individual fixation effect | Control | Control | Control |
| Time fixed effect | Control | Control | Control |
| R2 | 0.9654 | 0.9957 | 0.9982 |
| N | 390 | 390 | 390 |
