Efficiency of AI Technology Application in Music Education - A Perspective Based on Deep Learning Model DLMM
and
Mar 17, 2025
About this article
Published Online: Mar 17, 2025
Received: Oct 29, 2024
Accepted: Feb 07, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0326
Keywords
© 2025 Jie Chang et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
Comparison of different algorithms
| Algorithm | P/% | R/% | mAP@0.5/% | Model Parameters/Mb | Fps | Gflop |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRNN-Lite | 92.7 | 91.6 | 93.3 | 10.7 | 90.9 | 56.3 |
| CRNN-Lite+DLMM | 95.6 | 92.7 | 94.6 | 9.5 | 92 | 55.2 |
| CRNN-Lite+Mm-Sada | 69 | 51.2 | 53.8 | 3 | 173.8 | 10.4 |
| CRNN-Lite+Mla | 81.4 | 57.5 | 71 | 13.7 | 143.7 | 26.8 |
| CRNN-Lite+Pfts | 84 | 56.6 | 68.8 | 26.2 | 106.4 | 66.6 |
| CRNN-Lite+ |
61.5 | 44.4 | 50.1 | 4.7 | 192.7 | 12.3 |
| MIR | 73.4 | 53.3 | 60.9 | 14.8 | 160.1 | 44 |
| MIR + DLMM | 79 | 57.9 | 59.7 | 49.8 | 83.2 | 166.4 |
| MIR+Mm-Sada | 80.7 | 42.6 | 49.7 | 37.3 | 161.9 | 104.1 |
| MIR+Mla | 73.6 | 51.7 | 59.9 | 3.9 | 150.9 | 8.9 |
| MIR+Pfts | 84.3 | 57.7 | 67.2 | 11.8 | 175.5 | 27.3 |
| MIR+ |
86.5 | 61.2 | 68.8 | 26.1 | 92.5 | 80.8 |
| Polyphonic-Tromr | 68.3 | 54.6 | 60.4 | 8.9 | 171.7 | 11.5 |
| Polyphonic-Tromr+ DLMM | 76 | 61.3 | 71.5 | 15.7 | 148.2 | 26 |
| Polyphonic-Tromr+Mm-Sada | 84.7 | 63.3 | 72.2 | 18.3 | 97.6 | 65.5 |
| Polyphonic-Tromr+Mla | 62.5 | 40.6 | 56.1 | 3.6 | 190.7 | 4.8 |
| Polyphonic-Tromr+Pfts | 70.5 | 54.7 | 60.1 | 14.5 | 161.1 | 41.3 |
| Polyphonic-Tromr+ |
80.8 | 57.4 | 59.6 | 55.7 | 77.6 | 162.2 |
Matched sample
| Pair Difference | T | Freedom | Significance (Double Tail) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Value | Standard Deviation | Standard Error Mean | The Difference Is 95% Confidence Interval | ||||||
| Lower Limit | Upper Limit | ||||||||
| Pair 1 | Study Interest- Study Interest 2 | -1.95025 | 0.92366 | 0.12985 | -2.23115 | -1.68512 | -15.122 | 50 | 0.000 |
| Pair 2 | Learning Motivation- Learning Motivation 2 | -2.01585 | 0.80051 | 0.11362 | -2.24985 | -1.77544 | -17.854 | 50 | 0.000 |
| Pair 3 | Learning Efficiency- Learning Efficiency 2 | -2.10305 | 0.78442 | 0.10885 | -2.33165 | -1.87322 | -19.305 | 50 | 0.000 |
| Pair 4 | Learning Emotion- Learning Emotion 2 | -2.11065 | 0.76051 | 0.10601 | -2.42112 | -1.87622 | -20.055 | 50 | 0.000 |
Match sample analysis
| Mean Value | N | Standard Deviation | Standard Error Mean | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pair 1 | Study Interest | 2.3891 | 50 | 0.69622 | 0.09855 |
| Study Interest 2 | 4.3395 | 50 | 0.55987 | 0.06577 | |
| Pair 2 | Learning Motivation | 2.2501 | 50 | 0.53612 | 0.07602 |
| Learning Motivation 2 | 4.2651 | 50 | 0.52584 | 0.07362 | |
| Pair 3 | Learning Efficiency | 2.0561 | 50 | 0.49532 | 0.6855 |
| Learning Efficiency 2 | 4.1658 | 50 | 0.57846 | 0.08107 | |
| Pair 4 | Learning Emotion | 2.2989 | 50 | 0.59336 | 0.08425 |
| Learning Emotion 2 | 4.4102 | 50 | 0.51322 | 0.07321 |
Experiment length of different algorithms
| Algorithm | Training time(s) | Test time(s) |
|---|---|---|
| CRNN-Lite | 2215 | 465 |
| CRNN-Lite+DLMM | 1985 | 412 |
| CRNN-Lite+Mm-Sada | 3265 | 802 |
| CRNN-Lite+Mla | 2657 | 495 |
| CRNN-Lite+Pfts | 3019 | 777 |
| CRNN-Lite+ |
3530 | 778 |
| MIR | 2906 | 555 |
| MIR + DLMM | 4263 | 1011 |
| MIR+Mm-Sada | 2981 | 693 |
| MIR+Mla | 3265 | 780 |
| MIR+Pfts | 2648 | 504 |
| MIR+ |
2999 | 782 |
| Polyphonic-Tromr | 3523 | 770 |
| Polyphonic-Tromr+ DLMM | 2896 | 534 |
| Polyphonic-Tromr+Mm-Sada | 4260 | 1007 |
| Polyphonic-Tromr+Mla | 2969 | 683 |
| Polyphonic-Tromr+Pfts | 2983 | 796 |
| Polyphonic-Tromr+ |
3515 | 797 |
Student song performance
| Class | Laboratory Class(N=50) | Cross-Reference Class(N=50) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| ① | 33 | 66% | 20 | 40% |
| ② | 15 | 30% | 18 | 36% |
| ③ | 1 | 2% | 8 | 16% |
| ④ | 1 | 2% | 4 | 8% |