About this article
Published Online: Mar 17, 2025
Received: Oct 10, 2024
Accepted: Jan 27, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0231
Keywords
© 2025 Huiming Liu, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Transform the evaluation results of fingering
| Fingering class | Synreferential | Extended finger | Dactylocontraction | Referral | Illegal fingering |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score 1 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 4 | -2 |
| Score 2 | 6 | 6 | 3 | -2 | -3 |
| Score 3 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 4 | -3 |
| Score of 4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 |
| Score 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 1 | -2 |
| Average score | 6 | 3.8 | 2.4 | 2.2 | -2.6 |
The result of fingering sequence evaluation
| Fingering sequence number | Fingering sequence number | Total points | Scoring average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Standard | 48 | 0.96 |
| 2 | normal | 35 | 0.67 |
| 3 | Random | 9 | 0.15 |
Comparison of annotation results of different algorithms
| Accuarcy | Unrealizable rate | Unreasonable rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Original LSTM | 53.56% | 25.24% | 19.6% |
| Fault-tolerant LSTM | 59.91 % | 23.41% | 17.2% |
| Merged-output LSTM | 54.45% | 24.7% | 20.7% |
| Judgement-LSTM | 68.71% | 5% | 19.2 |
| Bi-LSTM-CRF (Note difference sequence) | 57.11% | 17.77% | 18.1% |
| BI-LSTM (Note sequence) | 69.7% | 0% | 3.87% |
D major scale and frequency correspondence table(Middle register)
| The pentatonic scale | roll-call | Phonetic name | Frequency(HZ) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Do | D | 585 |
| 2 | Re | E | 651 |
| 3 | Mi | #F | 735 |
| 5 | Sol | A | 875 |
| 6 | La | B | 991 |
| Chromatic scale | |||
| 4 | Fa | G | 774 |
| 7 | Si | #C | 1104 |