Relevance recommendation method based on multimedia technology-assisted English teaching design and teaching content
Feb 27, 2025
About this article
Published Online: Feb 27, 2025
Received: Sep 24, 2024
Accepted: Jan 16, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0121
Keywords
© 2025 YuNan Sun, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

Figure 13.

Table of ways for students to acquire knowledge outside the classroom
method | frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
teaching materials | 160 | 30 |
extracurricular books | 55 | 10 |
television | 45 | 9 |
Micro video | 170 | 32 |
broadcast | 30 | 6 |
other | 68 | 13 |
total | 528 | 100 |
Image quality evaluation comparison table
method | UEP-Raptor | EEP-Raptor | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PSNR(1) | SSIM(1) | PSNR(2) | SSIM(2) | |
1 | 32.98 | 0.91 | 9.08 | 0.27 |
2 | 32.87 | 0.89 | 24.71 | 0.85 |
3 | 33.11 | 0.90 | 29.57 | 0.86 |
4 | 32.58 | 0.90 | 5.56 | 0.24 |
5 | 31.33 | 0.89 | 27.38 | 0.73 |
Number of encoded packets and packet loss rate in video transmission
20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | |
67 | 107 | 160 | 214 | 296 | 403 | 472 | |
16 | 15 | 13 | 33 | 51 | 74 | 94 | |
13 | 16 | 13 | 12 | 15 | 18 | 23 | |
15 | 13 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 13 | 14 | |
14 | 14 | 15 | 15 | 13 | 17 | 15 |
Slope search algorithm for video distribution performance comparison table
SNR (dB) | Target rate (kbps) | Actual rate (kpds) | PSNR-Y | PSNR-U | PSNR-V | average PSNR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5(1) | 1000 | 995.4 | 35.3 | 42.6 | 44.2 | 37.9 | |
1.5(1) | 1500 | 1499.4 | 36.8 | 43.8 | 45.3 | 39.4 | |
2(1) | 450 | 430.2 | 32.1 | 41.1 | 42.8 | 35.4 | |
2(1) | 1000 | 1008 | 35.6 | 42.9 | 44.5 | 38.3 | |
2(1) | 1500 | 1452.7 | 36.9 | 43.8 | 45.3 | 39.5 | |
1.5(2) | 1000 | 981 | 35.1 | 42.3 | 43.6 | 37.6 | |
1.5(2) | 1500 | 1468.8 | 36.5 | 43.5 | 44.8 | 39.1 | |
2(2) | 450 | 450 | 32.6 | 40.3 | 41.6 | 35.4 | |
2(2) | 1000 | 1002.6 | 35.2 | 42.5 | 43.8 | 37.8 | |
2(2) | 1500 | 1427.4 | 36.7 | 43.5 | 44.8 | 39.2 |
Comparison table of experimental group and control group
group | number of people | The average score | Excellent rate (%) | Pass rate (%) | Low score rate (%) | standard deviation | standard error of the mean |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
test group | 50 | 75.6 | 32.5 | 95 | 5 | 10.2 | 1.6 |
control group | 50 | 69.8 | 12.5 | 87.5 | 12.5 | 8.2 | 1.3 |
Comparison between the two-sequence L W-EZEP model and its improved model
PSNR-Y | PSNR-U | PSNR-V | average PSNR | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
33.52 | 41.75 | 43.46 | 34.55 | ||
34.34 | 42.21 | 43.89 | 37.24 | ||
33.83 | 41.19 | 42.45 | 36.51 | ||
34.21 | 41.76 | 43.02 | 36.95 |