Open Access

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Numerical Solution of Abel′s Integral Equations using Hermite Wavelet

 and   
Oct 25, 2019

Cite
Download Cover

Fig. 1

Comparison of numerical solutions with exact solutions of example 1.
Comparison of numerical solutions with exact solutions of example 1.

Fig. 2

Comparison of numerical solutions, exact solutions and existing methods of example 2.
Comparison of numerical solutions, exact solutions and existing methods of example 2.

Fig. 3

Comparison of error analysis of example 2.
Comparison of error analysis of example 2.

Fig. 4

Comparison of Numerical solutions of example 3.
Comparison of Numerical solutions of example 3.

Fig. 5

Comparison of Numerical solutions of example 4.
Comparison of Numerical solutions of example 4.

Fig. 6

Comparison of Error analysis of example 4.
Comparison of Error analysis of example 4.

Numerical results of example 4_

x Exact solution Present method (k = 1, M = 10) Method [22] (k = 0, M = 16) Method [23] (m = 16)
0.1 0.414059 0.411229 0.415689 0.402472
0.2 0.508352 0.507572 0.505528 0.519751
0.3 0.564309 0.563685 0.566205 0.554755
0.4 0.603347 0.602926 0.601908 0.605031
0.5 0.632868 0.632521 0.634188 0.640487
0.6 0.656323 0.656059 0.655109 0.654785
0.7 0.675601 0.675358 0.676588 0.678700
0.8 0.691842 0.691690 0.691596 0.688860
0.9 0.705787 0.705398 0.704377 0.706495

Error analysis of example 3_

x Present method (k = 1, M = 10) Method [23] (m = 16)
0.1 1.52e-08 2.99e-03
0.2 6.92e-10 6.86e-03
0.3 1.79e-09 6.55e-03
0.4 5.79e-10 1.75e-03
0.5 1.04e-09 8.27e-03
0.6 3.79e-10 1.64e-03
0.7 1.14e-09 4.11e-03
0.8 9.93e-10 3.98e-03
0.9 8.86e-09 1.13e-03

Error analysis of example 2_

x Present method (k = 1, M = 10) Method [22] (k = 1, M = 8) Method [23] (m = 16)
0.1 4.73e-04 1.18e-03 8.57e-04
0.2 3.77e-05 1.38e-03 1.32e-02
0.3 6.21e-05 1.29e-03 1.11e-02
0.4 2.37e-05 1.52e-03 3.13e-03
0.5 2.85e-05 5.90e-04 1.38e-02
0.6 9.87e-06 4.19e-04 2.57e-03
0.7 2.72e-05 3.19e-04 7.08e-03
0.8 3.05e-05 2.54e-04 6.71e-03
0.9 2.59e-04 2.08e-04 2.09e-03

Error analysis of example 4_

x Present method (k = 1, M = 10) Method [22] (k = 0, M = 16) Method [23] (m = 16)
0.1 2.82e-03 1.62e-03 1.15e-02
0.2 7.79e-04 2.82e-03 1.13e-02
0.3 6.23e-04 1.89e-03 9.55e-03
0.4 4.21e-04 1.43e-03 1.68e-03
0.5 3.46e-04 1.32e-03 7.61e-03
0.6 2.63e-04 1.21e-03 1.53e-03
0.7 2.42e-04 9.86e-04 3.09e-03
0.8 1.50e-04 2.45e-04 2.98e-03
0.9 3.87e-04 1.40e-03 7.08e-04

Numerical results of example 1_

x Exact solution Present method (k = 1, M = 8) Abs. Error
0.1 0.9910 0.9910 1.61e-12
0.2 0.9680 0.9680 4.71e-13
0.3 0.9370 0.9370 2.27e-12
0.4 0.9040 0.9040 3.04e-12
0.5 0.8750 0.8750 2.52e-12
0.6 0.8560 0.8560 9.67e-13
0.7 0.8530 0.8530 9.64e-13
0.8 0.8720 0.8720 2.36e-12
0.9 0.9190 0.9190 2.36e-12

Numerical results of example 3_

x Exact solution Present method (k = 1, M = 10) Method [23] (m = 16)
0.1 0.953462589245592 0.953462604453520 0.95646081381695
0.2 0.912870929175277 0.912870928482700 0.90601007037324
0.3 0.877058019307029 0.877058021105882 0.88361513925322
0.4 0.845154254728517 0.845154255308354 0.84340093819493
0.5 0.816496580927726 0.816496581976408 0.80822420481499
0.6 0.790569415042095 0.790569415421744 0.79221049469412
0.7 0.766964988847370 0.766964989996025 0.76284677221990
0.8 0.745355992499930 0.745355991505969 0.74933888037055
0.9 0.725476250110012 0.725476258975992 0.72434536240934

Numerical results of example 2_

x Exact solution Present method (k = 1, M = 10) Method [22] (k = 1, M = 8) Method [23] (m = 16)
0.1 0.201317 0.200842 0.200128 0.200460
0.2 0.284705 0.284667 0.286092 0.297987
0.3 0.348691 0.348628 0.347394 0.337588
0.4 0.402634 0.402609 0.404161 0.405769
0.5 0.450158 0.450129 0.449568 0.464014
0.6 0.493124 0.493113 0.492704 0.490550
0.7 0.532634 0.532607 0.532315 0.539721
0.8 0.569410 0.569440 0.569156 0.562698
0.9 0.603951 0.603690 0.603742 0.606044
Language:
English