Open Access

Steady flow of a power law fluid through a tapered non-symmetric stenotic tube

Riaz Ahmad

Riaz Ahmad

School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’an, China
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Ahmad, Riaz
, 
Asma Farooqi

Asma Farooqi

School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’an, China
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Farooqi, Asma
, 
Jiazhong Zhang

Jiazhong Zhang

School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’an, China
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Zhang, Jiazhong
 and 
Nasir Ali

Nasir Ali

Department of Mathematics and statistics, International Islamic UniversityIslamabad, Pakistan
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Ali, Nasir
  
Jun 28, 2019
Steady flow of a power law fluid through a tapered non-symmetric stenotic tube's Cover Image
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Cite
Download Cover
Article Category: Papers dedicated to the memory of Valetnin Afraymovich (1945-2018)
Published Online: Jun 28, 2019
Page range: 255 - 266
Received: Oct 31, 2019
Accepted: Dec 19, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/AMNS.2019.1.00022
Keywords
© 2019 Riaz Ahmad et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Fig. 1

Geometry of non-symmetric stenotic artery.
Geometry of non-symmetric stenotic artery.

Fig. 2

Stenotic tapered artery for different taper angles.
Stenotic tapered artery for different taper angles.

Fig. 3

Velocity variation for F=2, δ=0.4, n=2, a=0.2, b=0.4.
Velocity variation for F=2, δ=0.4, n=2, a=0.2, b=0.4.

Fig. 4

Velocity variation for F=2, n=2, a=0.2, b=0.4, m=1.1.
Velocity variation for F=2, n=2, a=0.2, b=0.4, m=1.1.

Fig. 5

Velocity variation for F=2,δ =0.2, n=2, a=0.2, b=0.4, m=1.
Velocity variation for F=2,δ =0.2, n=2, a=0.2, b=0.4, m=1.

Fig. 6

Velocity variation for F=2, δ=0.4, a=0.2, b=0.4, m=1.1.
Velocity variation for F=2, δ=0.4, a=0.2, b=0.4, m=1.1.

Fig. 7

Wall shear stress variation for F=1, δ=0.2, a=0.2, b=0.4, m=1.
Wall shear stress variation for F=1, δ=0.2, a=0.2, b=0.4, m=1.

Fig. 8

Wall shear stress variation for F=1, L=1, a=0.2, b=0.4, m=1.
Wall shear stress variation for F=1, L=1, a=0.2, b=0.4, m=1.

Fig. 9

Wall shear stress variation for F=1, L=1, a=0.2, b=0.4,δ=0.4.
Wall shear stress variation for F=1, L=1, a=0.2, b=0.4,δ=0.4.

Fig. 10

Wall shear stress variation for F=1, L=1, a=0.2, b=0.4,δ=0.4.
Wall shear stress variation for F=1, L=1, a=0.2, b=0.4,δ=0.4.

Fig. 11

Resistance impedance for F=0.6, L=1, a=0.2, b=0.4, m=2.
Resistance impedance for F=0.6, L=1, a=0.2, b=0.4, m=2.

Fig. 12

Resistance impedance for F=0.6, L=1, a=0.2, b=0.4, n=2.
Resistance impedance for F=0.6, L=1, a=0.2, b=0.4, n=2.

Fig. 13

Resistance impedance for F=0.6, L=1, a=0.2, b=0.4, m=1.2, n=2.
Resistance impedance for F=0.6, L=1, a=0.2, b=0.4, m=1.2, n=2.

Fig. 14

Shear stress at stenotic throat for F=0.2.
Shear stress at stenotic throat for F=0.2.

Fig. 15

Shear stress at stenotic throat for m=2.
Shear stress at stenotic throat for m=2.
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
1 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Life Sciences, other, Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, General Mathematics, Physics, Physics, other
Journal RSS Feed